0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

professional indemnity

We understand that a negligence claim against a professional requires sensitive and careful handling given the significant reputational risks for the professional. Our experienced team of professional indemnity lawyers work closely with our client from the moment we are instructed to gain an understanding of their views on the claim, as well as the commercial considerations in play so that we can form a strategy that leads to a good outcome for our client and their insurer.

Our lawyers are experts in the professional services sectors in which they operate, allowing them to quickly identify the most pragmatic and commercial solutions to claims. Our specialist experience also means that we can provide value-added risk management support to our insurer clients’ policyholders, focused on mitigating the emerging exposures within the relevant professional sector. Our team has a substantial presence in London but the majority of our professional indemnity team is based in Nottingham. This allows us to provide dynamic claims solutions that offer genuine value for money, with a central base and five office network that gives our specialist lawyers national reach.

what we do...

  • Our clients – major professional indemnity insurers, Lloyd's syndicates, managing general agents, third party administrators, professional services firms and policyholders.
  • Bespoke claims handling schemes – providing fixed fee cost effective claims solutions.
  • Our experience – over 25 years acting for insurers and indemnifiers of a wide range of professions:
    • from the traditional; solicitors, accountants, surveyors,architects, construction professionals,insurance brokers, IFA's and other financial services professionals
    • all the way through to the emerging; management consultants, recruitment agencies, health and safety professionals and agronomists.
  • Specialist services - including professional liability claims defence, advising on institute ‘minimum terms’, coverage and indemnity disputes, claims handling, policy drafting, risk management advice and auditing, fraud and dishonesty investigations, and professional disciplinary enquiries.
  • Extension of your team - our clients regard us as an extension of their own team – whether we are working with underwriters on innovative new products, helping them win new business by attending risk presentations, or working with claims teams in mapping exposure to high value liabilities across entire books of business, such as those arising from mass mis-selling claims.
  • Industry membership – Forum of Insurance Lawyers, British Insurance Law Association, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, International Bar Association, Lloyd’s Market Association.

related resources

Legal updates

Court of Appeal rules on relevant ‘knowledge’ required under s.14A of the Limitation Act

A recent Court of Appeal judgment on 16 May 2018 considered the test for relevant ‘knowledge’ within section 14A of the Limitation Act. The Appellant was appealing against a decision granting the Respondents summary judgment on the basis that the claims against them in negligence and for breach of contract were time barred.


Legal updates

Supreme Court rejects War Risks cover for detained vessel

Navigators Insurance Company Limited and Others v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA (formerly Bnavios-Navegacao LDA) (‘The B Atlantic’) [2018] UKSC 26


Legal updates

Dreamvar: Back to the future

In 2017 the then Communities and Local Government Sajid Javid said that the utilisation of digital technology was a major theme of this government in its attempt to speed up and simplify home buying and selling process.


Legal updates

Court of Appeal rules on test for apparent bias and an arbitrator’s duty of disclosure

A recent Court of Appeal judgment considered the test for challenging the appointment of an arbitrator on the grounds of bias and in particular the extent of an arbitrator’s duty of disclosure to the parties as to his appointment in multiple related arbitrations.


what our clients say....

what the directories say...

recent experience

related opinions