Complex licensing, R&D and collaboration lawyer services
Establishing licensing structures which seek to grant different rights of use across different fields and applications and within different jurisdictions can seem complicated and challenging. Choosing the right licensing model for your business and putting in place the right documentation is essential to ensure that you maximise the value of any IP exploitation and effectively manage your licensing arrangements. An ad hoc and reactive licensing programme may lead to inefficient licensing, loss of revenues, difficulties in monitoring licensee activity and the granting of conflicting licences which could lead to licensee claims.
We have significant experience of advising a wide range of clients across numerous sectors on complex licensing arrangements. We carefully review existing licensing structures, the IP rights to be licensed and, current business strategy, as well as our client’s current licensing objectives. We help our clients to develop and implement an efficient and effective licensing structure with associated documentation that compliments their business strategy, meets their licensing objectives and which can be managed independently by the business.
R&D and collaboration arrangements can also involve complex licensing and ownership issues including use of background IP contributed by the parties for purposes outside of the project and the use of project foreground IP by the project participants, both for academic and commercial exploitation purposes.
We have extensive experience of R&D and collaboration agreements with members of the team having participated in secondments at a leading global engineering business, dealing with these types of arrangements on a daily basis. We understand the requirements and challenges faced by industrial participants and research organisations and the industry ‘ways of working’, as well as the issues associated with government funded projects including State aid considerations.
What we do
- Advising you on appropriate licensing models - for the exploitation of your IP assets including reviewing existing licensing structures and your current licensing objectives.
- Drafting and helping you to implement new licensing agreements - including the provision of template agreements with guidance on when and how documents are to be used by the business, as well as providing training to staff on the use of documents if required.
- Drafting and negotiating R&D and collaboration agreements.
- Specialist IP exploitation team - across our Birmingham, Nottingham and London offices drawing on experience from the worlds of engineering, electronics, telecommunications and biotechnology to deliver a service that understands industry and innovation.
- Advising industrial participants and research organisations on R&D and collaboration arrangements - including the licensing of background IP and the ownership and exploitation of project foreground IP, and the implications of government funding on the ownership of foreground IP, including State aid considerations.
A world leader in 3D holographic technology
Advising a world leader in 3D holographic technology on the restructuring of its existing global licensing structure. We carried out a detailed review of their existing licensing model and agreements and helped them to implement a more accessible and efficient one. This included identifying each of the different and separate licensing and exploitation arrangements which they were using and advising on which were appropriate to which situations. We also prepared a suite of standard template agreements, with guidance on when and how each should be used, ensuring the template agreements contained robust provisions for the identification, reservation and protection of our client's IP assets. Finally, we assisted with implementing the first tranche of licensing and exploitation agreements including with partners in Slovenia, India, Korea, Hong Kong and Russia. This enabled our client to see how the template agreements would be negotiated, completed and implemented in reality.
A large high street food retailer
We acted for a large high street food retailer who had engaged an international developer, producer and marketer of foodstuffs to develop a non-animal based mix of ingredients to substitute gelatine in confectionary products. We drafted and assisted in the negotiation of the R&D and exploitation agreement between the entities. This involved complex and difficult negotiations particularly around ownership and use of foreground IP. Key terms were concluded to the satisfaction of both parties including a programme of development works with milestones, ownership of foreground IP (recipes for gelatine substitute) by the food developer, obligations on the developer to seek patent protection for foreground IP, perpetual licence for the retailer to use recipes in the confectionary market under an exclusive licence for a defined period and an obligation on the retailer to purchase ingredients for recipe from food developer for exclusive licence period.
A major global engineering business
We have participated in a secondment at a major global engineering business advising on various R&D and collaboration arrangements with both industrial participants and research organisations. The work included drafting, reviewing and assisting with the negotiation of R&D and collaboration agreements, IP schedules and confidentiality agreements and advising on R&D contract structures and IP ownership under government funded projects.
You may be interested in...
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
Veganism and manufacturing: M&A trends
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
Veganism and manufacturing: Advertising pitfalls
The rise of AI in construction
An update on the independent review of university spin-out companies
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Kick-starting the UK hydrogen economy
The reasons for asset-based lending’s growing acceptance as a preferred funding source
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Browne Jacobson advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Knowledge exchange and intellectual property
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ( EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
AI generated designs on retail products
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
Creating a profitable future for your university intellectual property
NFTs and Smart Contracts - an in-house lawyers perspective
Browne Jacobson’s IP experts shine silver in world’s leading trade mark lawyer rankings
Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
Tipping the balance: Assessing patent infringement
In July this year, four years to the month after its introduction into UK law in the Supreme Court’s seminal judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly, the court handed down its latest decision applying the ‘doctrine of equivalents’.
Court of Appeal upholds decision that AI machines cannot be ‘inventors’
Women in knowledge exchange and spinouts
Browne Jacobson's IP team celebrates UK rankings success in latest Legal 500
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
Reaction: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment finds patent infringement based solely on equivalents
Diversity in spinouts, start-ups and early stage funding
Health care apps – Part 1 of 2: Exploring the ins and outs of intellectual property (IP)
In-House Lawyers: Brexit, intellectual property and commercial contracts
Covid-19 and the challenges associated with it grind on into a second wave. Not only that but there’s the prospect of Brexit and a looming recession ahead. It would be entirely forgivable not to be on top of the law right now. Watch our on-demand video, where we have discussed Brexit and intellectual property and consumer and commercial law changes.
Brexit overview: intellectual property and Brexit
We can how help you understand the potential issues that any changes will have on your business.
Could your new Covid-19 related intellectual property (IP) be commandeered by the Crown?
Universities across the nation have been working valiantly to produce a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, otherwise known as Covid-19, in addition to working tirelessly on new testing options. It is easy in these times to forget that universities may still own valuable intellectual property (IP) created in these efforts.
Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.
Amazon not liable for merely storing third party’s infringing goods
At a time when Amazon is fielding large spikes in demand amidst the coronavirus pandemic, the online retail platform will welcome the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) received on 2 April 2020.
Domain names as IP rights
How to commercialise your IP: licensing, spin outs and JVs
Our expert panel, comprised of IP and corporate law specialists, will be discussing IP commercialisation strategies, their benefits and pitfalls, drawing on experience across the private, public and higher education sectors.
O/281/19 Revocation (Device Marks) – 23 May 2019
This decision is a good example of how the IPO approaches non-use challenges, and an insight into the economics of gift shops at public parks.
Parallel Imports - what brand and IP owners need to know
Parallel importers seek to exploit price differentials for goods sold in different countries. The EU principle of exhaustion of rights prevents businesses from enforcing their IP rights to restrict this secondary trade within the EU if the goods were first marketed in the EU with their consent, other than in limited circumstances.
“Utterly horrified” masters and “blatantly inadmissible” evidence
The sole result for a search on Westlaw for the phrase “utterly horrified” is an interesting decision from Mr Justice Arnold on June 12 2019 about evidence in passing off proceedings.