Intellectual property law
The rights that protect our clients’ innovations, creativity and brands are often their key assets and critical to retaining their competitive edge. They trust us to help them identify, protect and exploit these rights in an increasingly complex and challenging environment. At Browne Jacobson, we make the complex simple and focus on providing pragmatic advice that gets straight to the solution.
Our award-winning intellectual property lawyers across the UK and Ireland advise on the full range of rights from patents, confidential information and designs to trade marks and copyright. Our team is ranked by World Trademark Review, Managing Intellectual Property and IAM Patent 1000, Chambers and Legal 500.
We regularly negotiate high-value R&D agreements and complex licensing agreements and are known for taking on high stakes IP disputes for major corporates on a national and international scale.
Most IP rights are territorial in nature, and we’re well equipped to handle the international aspects of portfolio management, exploitation and enforcement. We can quickly and cost effectively instruct and co-ordinate foreign lawyers and IP attorneys through our close global relationships with patent and trade mark attorneys, and through Pangea Net, a non-exclusive, international network of independent law firms.
What we do
- Advise on IP strategy, protection and clearance - we help you to protect your investment and to secure or maintain a competitive advantage by advising on the identification, capturing, clearance and protection of your IP.
- IP transactions and licensing – we help you maximise the value of your IP assets through licensing and other IP agreements and ensure you get the best deal by guiding you through the negotiations.
- Dispute resolution – we help you to enforce and defend your IP rights through a range of services including infringement proceedings and interim injunction applications, mediation and alternative dispute resolution and opinion work.
"The firm is strategically sound and has every discipline covered."
"They're one of the names that gets high-profile cases."
Featured experience
A Ward Limited: patents
Successfully enforcing the patents of global bulk material handler, A Ward Limited, through the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, deploying the then newly created UK doctrine of equivalents.
Cloud-based customer intelligence platform: in respect of a patent infringement and validity and breach of confidence
Advised the provider of a cloud-based customer intelligence platform in respect of a patent infringement and validity and breach of confidence dispute in which our client was the claimant. This involved a large number of complex issues surrounding infringement, validity, patentable subject matter and amendment of a software patent. A corresponding European Patent was being opposed in the EPO at the same time.
Match and Tinder: trade mark infringement
Assisted Match and Tinder to win at trial in their trade mark infringement proceedings against Muzmatch.
Wolverhampton FC: logo
Successfully defended Wolverhampton FC at trial in a High Court infringement claim concerning its iconic and longstanding wolf head logo.
Expertise
IP Assess
Product
"Intellectual property assessment app for businesses. Our free, no-obligation quick assessment app is designed to help you gain insight into the strengths and risks of your intellectual property position."Download now
Instant In-house
Product
"Instant In-house is a bespoke retainer product which provides you with instant access to a team of our lawyers for a fixed monthly fee. Instant In-house gives you the certainty on your monthly legal spend, whilst offering a greater breadth of expertise, more flexibility and less of the admin typically involved when instructing lawyers."Find out more
Testimonials
"The Browne Jacobson team is thorough, insightful and experienced."
"A dynamic firm with a young, talented team who are already disrupting the echelons of well-established IP litigation firms in the UK."
"Browne Jacobson always goes the extra mile. It is practical, pragmatic, commercial and realistic in its support – whether it is a small query or a substantive matter, its work is always of the highest standard."
"The outfit tackles contentious and transactional mandates with equal aplomb, priding itself on its ability to manage cases in any technological area – software, the automotive field, sportswear and 3D printing all count among the industries it has worked within lately."
Frequently asked questions
Intellectual property laws define and safeguard rights to inventions, designs, brands, and creative works, preventing unauthorised use or reproduction. These regulations empower creators to protect their innovations and original works.
To claim intellectual property rights, you typically need to register your creation with the appropriate authorities. For patents and trademarks, this involves filing with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), while copyright protection is granted automatically, without the need to apply. The process involves submitting necessary documentation, paying fees, and maintaining detailed records of your creation's development and originality to strengthen your claim to intellectual property rights.
Intellectual property ownership can differ depending on legal rules and agreements. Typically, creators initially own the rights, but they can transfer ownership through contracts or employment terms. IP creation and use laws and agreements ultimately decide ownership.
Key contacts
Declan Cushley
Partner
Mark Daniels
Partner
Giles Parsons
Partner
Nick Smee
Partner
Bonita Trimmer
Consultant
Jeanne Kelly
Partner
Ciarán Markey
Partner
You may be interested in...
Training
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Opinion
Forced labour goods: a landmark decision
Legal Update
ASA bans “misleading” Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon’s Den Star
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
Opinion
New hope for the manufacturing sector?
Guide
EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: Guide for your business
Legal Update
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
Jeanne Kelly recognised in the list of Top 100 people in Irish Tech by the Business Post
Press Release
New resource will support university innovation
Legal Update
A reflection of FIMA Connect 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson wins UK Impact Case of the Year at the Managing IP EMEA Awards 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Strong Roots on their acquisition by McCain Foods
Legal Update
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence – shaping a sustainable future
Legal Update
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Advertising pitfalls
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
An update on the independent review of university spin-out companies
On-Demand
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Published Article
The reasons for asset-based lending’s growing acceptance as a preferred funding source
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Legal Update
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Legal Update
Knowledge exchange and intellectual property
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
Legal Update
Creating a profitable future for your university intellectual property
On-Demand
NFTs and Smart Contracts - an in-house lawyers perspective
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s IP experts shine silver in world’s leading trade mark lawyer rankings
Opinion
Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
Published Article
Tipping the balance: Assessing patent infringement
In July this year, four years to the month after its introduction into UK law in the Supreme Court’s seminal judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly, the court handed down its latest decision applying the ‘doctrine of equivalents’.