‘You get what you pay for’ – the meaning of ‘professional services’ in D&C policies
The recent case of FKP Commercial Developments Pty Ltd v Zurich Australian Insurance Limited considered the meaning of ‘professional services’ within a design and construct policy.
Facts of the case
FKP Commercial Developments Pty Limited was the developer of a building project under a contract with FKP Constructions Pty Limited, a head contractor. FKP Constructions used third party consultants and sub-contractors, choosing not to perform any design or construction works itself.
The registered proprietors of the common property and commercial buildings alleged:
- numerous defects and non-complying construction work; and
- losses arising from breaches of the statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989 and/or a common law or statutory duty of care.
The FKP parties sought an indemnity for the claim under their ‘Design and Construction Professional Indemnity’ insurance policy. Insurers rejected the claim on the basis that the potential liability did not arise from the provision of ‘professional services’ as defined under the policy.
Judgment
On the question of whether the claim was a ‘claim for civil liability… based on the insured’s provision of professional services’, the court held the claim fell outside the scope of the policy. The court held that FKP’s liability arose from its position as the owner/developer of the property, and not from the provision of professional services.
The court characterised the liability of the FKP parties as wholly based on or arising from the following, which were not covered under the policy:
- Construction, manufacture, assembly, installation, erection, maintenance or physical alteration of buildings, goods, products or property (which are excluded from the definition of ‘Professional Services’); or
- Defects in or lack of suitability of products and goods used in the construction of the common property of the residential building’ (which are excluded under the policy).
Considerations for underwriters
This case serves as a reminder that, in the words of the judge in the case, ‘a party gets the policy they pay for’.
Contents
- The Word, November 2022
- An update on articles in previous editions of the Word
- ‘Final judgment’ or ‘final adjudication’ - what’s the difference?
- Atlanta adopts Plain Numbers to improve policy readability
- Duty to defend - when is it triggered?
- Date of incident or date of coverage decision – when does the cause of action commence?
Contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Legal Update
JCT 2024: What’s new? An overview of the changes
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises European micromobility insurtech Laka on investment from Achmea Innovation Fund
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, March 2024
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Legal Update
Commercial Court considers requests for stay or anti-suit injunction where two competing reinsurance wordings
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Legal Update
Parametric flood policies - Insurers no longer in uncharted waters?
Legal Update
LockBit unlocked: International taskforce takes down major cyber criminal organisation
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
80% of GAP market pause sales amid Consumer Duty concerns
Legal Update
FCA writes to MPs over car insurance premiums. What do increases mean for fraud?
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: A new landscape for restoration clauses
Legal Update
The regulators’ pet project
Legal Update
Welsh Government inks new regulations for Acupuncture, Body piercing, Electrolysis and Tattooing
Legal Update
Insurance and the escalating situation in Suez Canal
Legal Update
Update: Further debates on the Automated Vehicles Bill in the House of Lords this month
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, February 2024
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, January 2024
Legal Update
Voldemort causes havoc at Sellafield – nuclear risks and insurance policies
Legal Update
A blow to manufacturers as Thai Court confirms insurers’ denial of cover in wind turbine case
Legal Update
Adapting to change or falling behind? The FCA under fire from the National Audit Office
Legal Update
Premium finance – a poverty premium
Legal Update
'Clear and unambiguous' exclusions: Cameron Soule v Woodward Design + Build LLC
Legal Update
Follow the leader: Insurers using algorithmic underwriting
Legal Update
Insurance Insights 2024
Legal Update
Statutory assignment to insurers not caught by no-assignment clause
Legal Update
Court of Appeal decision again demonstrates the need for reform of the Solicitors Minimum Terms
Legal Update
2024: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
The Building Safety Act: What to expect in 2024
Legal Update
The impact of insolvencies on construction in 2024
Legal Update
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update
ESG and the path to net zero: Construction industry considerations
Legal Update
Modern methods of construction and modular buildings
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
A new JCT suite in 2024
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, December 2023
