Duty to defend - when is it triggered?
In the recent case of Main St Am Assurance Co v Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, the New York appeal court considered when a duty to defend was triggered under a policy wording.
The facts
The case concerned an injury to a sub-contractor on a construction project. The sub-contractor benefitted from insurance that had been taken out with the Defendant.
The policy included cover for ‘liability for bodily injury…caused in whole or in part by the [policyholder’s] acts or omissions’. However, the claim against the contractor alleged violation of labor laws, but not negligence. Accordingly, insurers argued they had no duty to defend the claim as it did not satisfy the policy’s insuring clause.
Decision
The court adopted a purposive approach and held that insurers were obliged to defend the claim. In reaching that decision, the court held that the insurer’s duty to defend would be triggered if the complaint suggests a “reasonable possibility” that the claims may fall within the scope of the policy. Even though the underlying complaint did not specifically allege negligence, it did suggest a reasonable possibility that negligence was a proximate cause of the sub-contractor’s injuries, thereby potentially bringing the claim within the ambit of policy.
Accordingly, the court held that insurers did have a duty to defend the contractor, despite the fact the complaint did not actually allege that the subcontractor had been negligent.
This decision confirms that the court may take a purposive approach when considering an insurer’s duty to defend, rather than strictly following the pleaded cause of action.
Contents
- The Word, November 2022
- An update on articles in previous editions of the Word
- ‘You get what you pay for’ – the meaning of ‘professional services’ in D&C policies
- ‘Final judgment’ or ‘final adjudication’ - what’s the difference?
- Atlanta adopts Plain Numbers to improve policy readability
- Date of incident or date of coverage decision – when does the cause of action commence?
Contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises European micromobility insurtech Laka on investment from Achmea Innovation Fund
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, March 2024
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Legal Update
Commercial Court considers requests for stay or anti-suit injunction where two competing reinsurance wordings
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Legal Update
Parametric flood policies - Insurers no longer in uncharted waters?
Legal Update
LockBit unlocked: International taskforce takes down major cyber criminal organisation
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
80% of GAP market pause sales amid Consumer Duty concerns
Legal Update
FCA writes to MPs over car insurance premiums. What do increases mean for fraud?
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: A new landscape for restoration clauses
Legal Update
The regulators’ pet project
Legal Update
Welsh Government inks new regulations for Acupuncture, Body piercing, Electrolysis and Tattooing
Legal Update
Insurance and the escalating situation in Suez Canal
Legal Update
Update: Further debates on the Automated Vehicles Bill in the House of Lords this month
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, February 2024
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, January 2024
Legal Update
Voldemort causes havoc at Sellafield – nuclear risks and insurance policies
Legal Update
A blow to manufacturers as Thai Court confirms insurers’ denial of cover in wind turbine case
Legal Update
Adapting to change or falling behind? The FCA under fire from the National Audit Office
Legal Update
Premium finance – a poverty premium
Legal Update
'Clear and unambiguous' exclusions: Cameron Soule v Woodward Design + Build LLC
Legal Update
Follow the leader: Insurers using algorithmic underwriting
Legal Update
Insurance Insights 2024
Legal Update
Statutory assignment to insurers not caught by no-assignment clause
Legal Update
Court of Appeal decision again demonstrates the need for reform of the Solicitors Minimum Terms
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, December 2023
Legal Update - London Market Quarterly
London Market, Autumn 2023: What the insurance market needs to know
![Al Mana Lifestyle Trading L.L.C. & Others v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 61 – Update](/getattachment/b24270a8-0bb3-4a8a-bcf0-37830f99591b/shutterstock_710149084_6x4.jpg?variant=HeroImageTabletVariantDefinition)
Legal Update
Al Mana Lifestyle Trading L.L.C. & Others v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 61 – Update
Legal Update
Proposed amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Update
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Legal Update
Chubb leads a $50m consortium to help mitigate the increasing risks associated with lithium-ion batteries
Legal Update
Climate change related insurance decisions being made around the world
Legal Update
D&O: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘personal advantage'
Legal Update
Trade credit: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘recoveries’
Legal Update
Energy insurance: Technip Saudi Arabia Limited v The Mediterranean and Gulf Cooperative Insurance and Reinsurance Company ('Medgulf')
