0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

personal injury protocol consultation launched

13 June 2014

As part of its review of pre action protocols, the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Committee has launched a consultation on changes to the protocol for personal injury claims.

Since introduction of the new processes for low value motor, EL and PL claims the injury protocol has become less used, but it remains the basis on which fast track claims are handled where liability is denied or claims otherwise exit the new processes. Alongside the multi-track code (which will remain voluntary), it also informs pre-action behaviour in higher value cases.

The protocol will be simplified, bringing an increased focus on rehabilitation and ADR and dispensing with some of the detailed discussion of underlying principles, but proposed changes to process and time limits are limited. There is little evidence of ‘Jacksonisation’ with no additional costs control measures or sanctions, which reflects the fact there are already fixed costs for many fast track injury claims and a stricter approach to compliance introduced to the remainder of the CPR.

The consultation will remain open until 14 July.

related opinions

Applying QOCS protection in a claim for personal injury and something else

In The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown [2018], the High Court ruled that a Circuit Judge was wrong to automatically apply QOCS protection to a claim for misuse of data which also included a claim for personal injury.

View blog

Personal injury reforms delay

In May 2018 I prepared a blog entitled ‘small claims u-turn?’ after the Justice Select Committee called on the government to put the ex-Chancellor George Osborne’s plans to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims and prohibit awards of general damages for minor soft tissue injuries on hold whilst the past five years of reforms are evaluated.

View blog

Risk warning: independent contractors

Various Claimants v Barclays Bank is a claim in vicarious liability arising from sexual assaults perpetrated by an independent doctor conducting health examinations on employees and prospective employees of Barclays Bank, on the bank’s behalf.

View blog

Vicarious liability and independent contractors: the law continues to evolve

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Barclays Bank plc and Various Claimants has been handed down.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up