0370 270 6000

Part 36 – is a loophole about to be closed?

15 February 2021

Part 36 offers in litigation are used tactically to make a settlement offer while simultaneously placing the other side on risk of not ‘beating’ that offer at trial.

In the case of Pallett v MGN Ltd [2021] EWHC 76 (Ch), the Claimant made a Part 36 offer to the Defendant with the usual 21 day ‘relevant period’ for acceptance. If the Defendant had accepted the offer within the relevant period, the Defendant would be obliged to pay the Claimant’s legal costs. But the Defendant didn’t – it accepted the offer on the 22nd day. This meant that the automatic liability to pay the Claimant’s costs did not apply and instead, the Defendant argued that it was entitled to invite the Court to consider its liability to pay the Claimant’s costs.

The delay in accepting the Claimant’s offer was a tactical move so the Defendant could raise arguments about the Claimant’s costs. This loophole allowed the Defendant to avoid the automatic costs consequences of accepting the offer which on a common-sense analysis, surely cannot have been the drafting intention.

We expect there to be further case law on this point or that Part 36 will soon be amended to close this loophole.

If you are involved in litigation then you should consider Part 36 carefully before making, or accepting, an offer.

Related opinions

Wide interpretation of “detriment” caused victimisation claim to succeed

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the case of Warburton v The Chief Constable.

View blog

Restrictive Covenants – are changes coming?

Restrictive covenants are widely recognised as a complex area of employment law that is of key importance to many organisations. However more recently, they have become a hot topic with the Government launching their consultation.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Dealing with Covid Rent Arrears – an overview but no specifics

Following on from our recent article on the release of the updated Code of Practice for dealing with commercial rent arrears that have accrued throughout the pandemic, we continue to highlight what the overall principles seek to ensure - fairness and proportionality for both landlords and tenants across each step of the arbitration process.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up