0370 270 6000

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

29 October 2020

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights and the recent decision in Capitol Park Leeds plc v Global Radio Services Ltd is no exception to this position.

The tenant had a right to break its lease on condition that it delivered vacant possession of the property to the landlord. The tenant had stripped out significant elements of the base build and landlord’s fixtures in the property and the landlord argued that, in returning the property minus those elements, it had not complied with the vacant possession condition.

The judge agreed with the landlord. One of the tests for determining whether vacant possession has been given is that there is no substantial physical impediment to the enjoyment of the property. That test was not satisfied where a tenant handed back an empty shell of a building which was dysfunctional and not capable of being occupied.

This case emphasises how important it is for a tenant negotiating a new lease to resist any requirement that a break right is conditional on the delivery of vacant possession. In this case, had the break right been conditional just on the tenant giving up occupation and leaving behind no subtenants or other occupiers (a common compromise position), the tenant would have been able to exercise it successfully.

Related opinions

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up