0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

retailers and landlords, are your commercial leases future-proof?

2 October 2019

Voir cette page en Français

The last two weeks have seen yet another flurry of announcements regarding big high street names. On 23 September, Thomas Cook ceased trading and around 600 stores simultaneously shut their doors. Two days later, Sainsbury’s announced it would shut another 60-70 Argos stores to cut costs, as it relocates 80 further stores into its supermarkets. Monday saw the confirmation from administrators that all Karen Millen and Coast stores and concessions have now closed.

The wider trend is a difficult picture for high streets. Recent analysis suggested that twice as many chain retailer stores were closed than were opened in the first six months of 2019. The trend of store closures stretches back to 2018 and beyond, as store vacancies on high streets hit a 4-year high this summer.

Much ink has been spilled about the various pressures ranging from rising labour costs, falling revenues, rising business rates (or the modest relief available), online retail, changing consumer habits and tastes, and the shift towards experience-driven shopping.

In and among all these challenges, we are seeing opportunities. Whether landlord or tenant, future-proofing your interests can start through looking closely at your portfolio and your lease provisions. We have seen all manner of open and frank discussions start anywhere from competitor exclusions and turnover rent provisions, to break clauses, sub-lets, shared occupation or lease surrenders.

What is clear is that it is more important than ever to understand where your leases leave you, and what your options (or opportunities!) may be in the current market. No one wins when stores are left empty.

related opinions

Service charges – the bad news keeps coming for tenants!

A few months ago, we discussed a case where the Court of Appeal ruled that the wording of a lease precluded the tenant from arguing that certain costs should not have been included in the service charge calculation. A recent high-profile case concerns a broadly similar issue, this time in relation to the proportion of the landlord’s costs payable by a tenant.

View blog

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not fulfil a vacant possession break condition

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. Courts have consistently required strict compliance with the terms of those rights.

View blog

Retail ATMs and business rates: clarity at last!

Judgement has been handed down for the seminal case of Cardtronics UK Ltd and others (Respondents) v Sykes and others (Valuation Officers) (Appellants) [2020] UKSC 21.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up