0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Mullaney v Chief Constable of the West Midlands, Court of Appeal, 15 May 2001

21 May 2001
The issues

Police – Duty Owed To A Constable – Dereliction Of Duty On The Part Of Colleague – Vicarious Liability

The facts

The Claimant was injured in the course of a police operation relating to importuning in public lavatories. Whilst alone and trying to arrest a suspect he was assaulted and seriously injured. He brought an action against the Chief Constable alleging that the injuries that he sustained in the later stages of the incident were caused by the failure of another Police Officer to come to his aid and stop the attack. At Trial it was found as a fact that there had been a serious dereliction of duty on the part of a fellow officer (K) – that the Claimant’s injuries would have been prevented had K come to his aid – that there had been a cover up by the creation of a false log and false evidence given in Court by Police Officers. The Chief Constable appealed.

The decision

K had failed to comply with a specific police duty that had exposed the Claimant to risk of injury. There was no distinction between the duty owed by an employer to his employee and the duty owed by a Chief Constable to Police Officers in his charge. The relationship between the Chief Constable and his Officers was so closely analogous to that between an employer and employees to make it just in principal to hold that he owed the same duties – namely a non delegable duty of care to devise and operate a safe system of work. There was no public policy reason why that duty should not extend to the system involving K. The Defendant was therefore liable for breach of duty if care was not exercised to operate the system safely. If K had exercised reasonable care the system would have been safely operated. The Defendant was liable vicariously for K’s failure.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up