Aon has urged US lawmakers to establish a coordinated, whole government approach to artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, emphasising the need for a national policy framework that ensures insurability while promoting innovation.
This call came during testimony by Kevin Kalinich, Aon's Intangible Assets Global Collaboration Leader, before a government committee on 30 July 2025.
Rising AI risks and industry warnings
AI-related incidents have surged 56% year on year according to Stanford's 2025 AI Index Report. Identified risks include large language model hallucinations, AI cyber-attacks, deepfakes, intellectual property infringement, data leakage, AI 'washing', and robotic faults.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has warned that AI could disrupt labour markets and economic stability at an unprecedented pace.
Kalinich also highlighted that AI-induced systemic disruption poses significant insurability challenges. Traditional insurance models rely on uncorrelated, diversifiable risk pools, but AI-related risks could become correlated and systemic, creating "unquantifiable aggregate exposures" that are difficult to price and underwrite using existing structures.
Existing regulatory initiatives and policy recommendations
Aon supports building on existing initiatives like the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' model bulletin on AI use by insurers (adopted December 2023 and now implemented by over half of US states). Aon also endorses incorporating the bulletin's affirmative safety principles into a national framework, while allowing states to serve as innovation laboratories.
Aon supports public policy that establishes clear liability frameworks, maintains viable insurance markets, and enables developers and end users to operate with confidence.
Additionally, Aon encourages lawmakers to establish a national, principles-based framework for AI so that AI becomes "a force for good, guided by insight, trust, and shared responsibility”.
What does this mean for insurers?
For insurers, Aon's call for AI regulation signals both challenges and opportunities ahead. The insurance industry should prepare for fundamental shifts in risk assessment and underwriting as AI-related incidents may continue to surge.
While traditional insurance models clearly face disruption, the proposed national framework may offer insurers some regulatory clarity.
Contents
- The Word, August 2025
- Lutz v Ryanair: What does the latest case on agency workers mean for EPL insurers?
- Template binder update: Profit commission clauses
- Admiral sets aside £50m for customer compensation
- How geospatial data is becoming a crucial part of risk analysis: What this means for insurers
- Questions insurers should be asking about their clients' AI usage
- The Arbitration Act 2025: What does it mean for insurers?

Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
You may be interested in
Legal Update
Questions insurers should be asking about their clients' AI usage
Legal Update
Aon calls for national AI regulation framework
Legal Update
Individual pricing, or there and back again: What UK businesses can learn from Delta’s AI pricing U-turn
Legal Update
The rise of AI shopping: Is it the end of retailers’ direct relationship with customers?
Legal Update
Embracing AI: Revolutionising maternity care and patient safety in the NHS
Legal Update
“Silent AI”: The risk of unintended consequences
Legal Update
Digital trendsetters: The rise of AI influencers in fashion and beauty
Guide
KCSiE 2025 guidance: What schools need to know
Press Release
10-year health plan: Reaction from Browne Jacobson's health and life sciences team
Opinion
Silent AI threat to insurers: Don’t leave it to chance
Legal Update
New DfE AI guidance: A welcome start, but needs further development
Guide
InsurTech explained: How technology is revolutionising insurance
Opinion
Spending Review: Setting the stage for UK investment
Guide
Using AI for recruitment: The data issues
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence: Accountability and opportunities in the insurance sphere
Legal Update
Outsourcing contracts in the age of AI
Guide - Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehicles in the UK: Where are we now?
Legal Update
Is AI regulation making it more difficult for insurers to price risks?
Legal Update
Top tips for schools handling AI generated complaints
Legal Update
Hyper-personalisation: Key considerations for organisations implementing AI solutions
Published Article
Building bridges in edtech: The convergence of AI governance and educational needs
Legal Update
US tariffs: Market chaos and implications for the UK tech sector
Legal Update
Information Commissioner announces new AI guidance and package of measures to support the Government’s growth agenda
Legal Update
AI adoption in schools: Meeting ICO expectations
Legal Update
How should artificial intelligence be deployed in schools?
Legal Update
Estyn to review the use of AI within schools in Wales
Legal Update
Understanding AI: A guide for healthcare professionals
Legal Update
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in public sector procurements
On-Demand
Embracing AI in schools: Ensuring accountability, compliance and good governance
Guide
EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: Guide for your business
Legal Update
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
The Financial Conduct Authority’s approach to AI regulation
Legal Update
The EU AI Act: What does it mean for insurers?
Legal Update
Common AI related technology project disputes and how to prevent them
The increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising the way businesses operate and is having a disruptive impact in sectors that have traditionally been slow to modernise.
Opinion - Autonomous vehicles
Automated Vehicles - the next junction in the legal landscape
As a developing area, key stakeholders in this space such as insurers, and technology and software developers looking to become ASDEs or NUIC operators, should keep a keen eye on whether the Government proceeds with introducing new legislation in line with the report’s recommendations.