SPS Groundworks & Building Ltd v Mahil [2022] EWHC 371 (QB)
A seller failed on an auction sale to comply with its common law duty to disclose an overage obligation affecting the property.
A seller failed on an auction sale to comply with its common law duty to disclose an overage obligation affecting the property.
Facts
A plot of land was sold at auction in 2019. The land was subject to an overage obligation from 2017 which required payment of 50% of the uplift in the value of land attributable to obtaining planning permission.
The legal pack prepared for the auction sale by the seller (SPS) included a copy of the deed of covenant containing the overage obligation and the deed was referred to in a restriction in the proprietorship register of the title to the land (which was also part of the legal pack). There was no specific reference to the overage obligation in the auction brochure and no oral reference was made to it by the auctioneer who conducted the auction. The sale was though subject to the Common Auction Conditions (3rd Edition), which provided that the land was sold subject to all matters contained or referred to in the auction pack.
The highest bidder at the auction (M) had visited the land, but she did not look at the auctioneer’s website. She picked up an auction catalogue at the auction, but did not read the terms and conditions. She refused to complete the purchase when she discovered the existence of the overage obligation.
Issue
Had SPS failed in its common law duty to disclose the overage obligation affecting the property?
Decision
A seller has a duty to disclose all latent defects in title and encumbrances of which they are aware, irrespective of whether a buyer makes enquiries. Where there is no specific reference to a defect, a buyer can assume that entries on a title register (or in other relevant documentation) would be the usual sort of entries that would not significantly affect value.
SPS had not complied with its duty of disclosure. References in the auction brochure and by the auctioneer to the need to read the legal pack were insufficient. Those references were made in respect of all 35 lots at the auction. Full and frank disclosure instead required the overage obligation to be specifically brought to M’s attention by description in the particulars, an addendum notice or specific reference by the auctioneer.
Point to note/consider
It must be said that this is a hard decision to understand. A seller’s implied duties to sell a property free from encumbrances (other than those disclosed to a buyer or subject to which the sale is expressly made) and to disclose all latent (i.e. non-obvious) defects in title and encumbrances are not in doubt. However, most people would have thought that supplying the relevant deed of covenant and official copies (which referred to the relevant encumbrance) would have sufficed to discharge those duties.
The outcome of this case is particularly significant with auction sales, where a seller knows (or suspects) that a potential buyer may bid for a property (and therefore become contractually bound to buy it) before a lawyer has carried out any due diligence. In those circumstances, it would be a sensible precaution for a seller to make sure that any significant title defects or encumbrances are specifically and clearly highlighted in the auction pack or by the auctioneer (rather than relying on standard conditions and generic disclaimers).
Contact

David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Platform Housing on landmark deal, creating over 300 affordable and sustainable homes
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Minster Property Group on major Suffolk affordable housing project
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Legal Update
The importance of three magic words
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Building our future town centres: advising local authorities on landmark acquisitions
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Legal Update
Assured shorthold tenancies for schools… let them have it!
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise façade engineering consultants Wintech Group on its acquisition of AVUS Consulting
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
Legal Update
Spring has sprung - update on the Charities Act coming into force
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Opinion
The long-awaited Renters Reform Bill is finally introduced into Parliament
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
Retirement housing: A solution to our care and housing crises?
Legal Update
Understanding the obligations and implications for open space land and development
Article
Interest from Asia boosts investor confidence in UK commercial real estate
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Legal Update
Regeneration: what role can universities play?
Opinion
Biodiversity Net Gain - Government publishes its metric consultation response & Natural England publishes their update biodiversity metric 4.0
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Opinion
‘Awaab’s Law’- a significant amendment to the Social Housing Regulation Bill
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Opinion
Will fixed recoverable costs in housing conditions claims see the light of day?
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Opinion
“A Modern Nuisance”
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Legal Update
Hillside – the end of drop in applications?
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Press Release
Former Mace Group Legal Director joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director of its Construction & Real Estate sector
Browne Jacobson has appointed Amy Chapman, the former Group Legal Director of global built environment experts Mace Group, as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Construction & Real Estate sector strategy board.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Bromley Council on the first social housing initiative of its kind to tackle homelessness
Opinion
Rent arrears post-Covid: What are the landlord’s options?
Since the beginning of the pandemic, landlords and tenants have experienced significant limitations in the way rent arrears could be pursued. We first saw the moratorium on the recovery of Covid related arrears, and more recently we’ve experienced the implementation of the Covid arrears arbitration scheme.