Tenant’s lease not frustrated by Brexit: Canary Wharf Ltd v European Medicines Agency
The High Court has ruled in a highly significant case that a tenant’s lease is not frustrated by Brexit.
Facts
The European Medicines Agency is an agency of the European Union (EU) and the tenant of a property at Canary Wharf under a 25 year lease running until 2039 (with no break clauses) at a current passing rent of £13m a year. After the United Kingdom (UK) decided to leave the EU, a 2018 EU Regulation was passed requiring The European Medicines Agency to relocate to Amsterdam. It purported to terminate its lease on the basis that the lease was frustrated by Brexit.
The landlord sought a declaration that the lease had not been frustrated and remained in force.
Issues
- Did Brexit cause The European Medicines Agency's lease to be frustrated by supervening illegality?
- Alternatively, was this a case of frustration of a common purpose?
Decision
- The lease had not been frustrated by supervening illegality. Despite Brexit, The European Medicines Agency retained capacity to deal with immovable property in a third country (i.e. one outside the EU) and to pay rent or assign or sub-let according to the lease. Moreover, the EU had power to maintain the headquarters of its agencies in a third country (although there are obvious political and logistical reasons for not doing so).
In any event, even if it had been illegal for The European Medicines Agency to retain and deal with the lease under EU law, it would not have made any difference to the outcome, since the doctrine of frustration under English law considered whether performance of a contract would be unlawful according to the law of the place of performance, not according to the law of the place of incorporation.
Even if The European Medicines Agency's lease was frustrated, the frustration would have been self-induced. The EU could have done more than order The European Medicines Agency's relocation to Amsterdam by the 2018 Regulation. For example, it could have included provisions for the winding down of The European Medicines Agency's position in the UK and its departure from London.
- The lease was not frustrated by the failure of a common purpose. There had been no mutual contemplation that the purpose of the lease was to provide The European Medicines Agency with headquarters for 25 years. Even if Brexit had not been reasonably foreseeable at the time the parties entered into an agreement for lease in 2011, it had been foreseeable that, over 25 years, some development might require The European Medicines Agency to leave the premises involuntarily and the parties had expressly catered for that by the alienation provisions in the lease. The lease represented the outcome of negotiations between the parties with different (not common) objectives (The European Medicines Agency wanted bespoke premises, flexibility as to terms and the lowest rent possible and the landlord wanted long-term cash flow, at the highest rent possible).
Points to note/consider
- A contract may be discharged for frustration when something occurs after its formation that makes it impossible to fulfil the contract or transforms the obligations under the contract into radically different obligations from those undertaken at the time the contract was entered into. Although in theory the doctrine of frustration can apply to leases, there are no reported cases where it has been successfully argued.
- In this case, The European Medicines Agency had been unable to negotiate for the inclusion of a break clause in the lease (presumably preferring instead the financial inducements that it received from its landlord of over £40m). It had opted to rely on the alienation provisions in the lease and they must now do their job. However, the case does at a basic level illustrate for tenants the importance of including break clauses in long-term leases to preserve flexibility.
- This decision has been greeted with much relief by landlords, investors and lenders. Had the decision gone the other way, the uncertainty it would have produced could have had a significant unsettling effect on the UK commercial property market (at a time when we really do not need any more uncertainty). Tenants (and other parties to commercial contracts) may well have thought that if The European Medicines Agency can use frustration to escape its contractual commitments, then so can they.
- The European Medicines Agency has been given leave to take this case to the Court of Appeal, so it does not sound like we have heard the last of this matter.
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
You may be interested in...
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Guide
Terminating student lettings: a quick guide for landlords
Online Event
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Opinion
Rent arrears post-Covid: What are the landlord’s options?
Since the beginning of the pandemic, landlords and tenants have experienced significant limitations in the way rent arrears could be pursued. We first saw the moratorium on the recovery of Covid related arrears, and more recently we’ve experienced the implementation of the Covid arrears arbitration scheme.
Published Article
RAAC planks and its impact on local authorities
Recent reports of flat roofs constructed using RAAC planks collapsing without warning prompted the SCOSS alert.
Opinion
Update: building safety repairs pledge signed by over 35 major housing developers
On 14 February 2022, Secretary of State of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove, announced proposals designed to pressure building developers and materials manufacturers to fund the remediation of unsafe properties.
Opinion
Building Safety Bill amendments
Legal Update
SPS Groundworks & Building Ltd v Mahil [2022] EWHC 371 (QB)
A seller failed on an auction sale to comply with its common law duty to disclose an overage obligation affecting the property.
Legal Update
W (No.3) GP (Nominee A ) Ltd and another v J D Sports Fashion Plc (Nottingham County Court, 22 October 2021)
The County Court refuses the landlord’s request to include a turnover rent in a statutory lease renewal.
Legal Update
Brooke Homes (Bicester) Ltd v Portfolio Property Partners Ltd & Others [2021] EWHC 3015 (Ch)
The court provides some useful guidance on the different types of endeavours obligations and good faith clauses.
Legal Update
Ventgrove Ltd v Kuehne Nagel Ltd 2021 CSOH 129
A tenant in Scotland had validly exercised a break option even though it failed to pay VAT on the break premium.
Legal Update
Real estate quarterly update – January to March 2022
Read more about our latest real estate update aimed at in-house lawyers practising in the property and real estate sector.
Legal Update
Bath Rugby Ltd v Greenwood and others [2021] EWCA Civ 1927
A 1922 restrictive covenant was unenforceable as it did not clearly identify the land intended to be benefited by it.
Legal Update
Kensquare Ltd v Boakye [2021] EWCA Civ 1725
Time was of the essence for the purposes of a landlord’s notice to increase a tenant’s interim service charge contribution.
Legal Update
Macey v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd [2021] EWHC 2847 (Ch)
A landlord did not demonstrate the requisite intention required to oppose a statutory lease renewal underground (g).
Legal Update
Wynne-Finch and others v Natural Resources Body for Wales [2021] EWCA Civ 1473
Historic exceptions of mines and minerals did not include mudstone, the common rock of the district.
Legal Update
Stonecrest Marble Ltd v Shepherds Bush Housing Association Ltd [2021] EWHC 2621 (Ch)
Where a lease provides a comprehensive scheme of repair and insurance, the court will not imply terms to cover any gaps in that scheme.
Legal Update
Real estate quarterly update - October to December 2021
Read more about our latest real estate update aimed at in-house lawyers practising in the property and real estate sector.
Legal Update
Capitol Park Leeds Plc and another v Global Radio Services Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 995
A tenant who handed back an empty shell of a building had complied with a condition of its break option to give vacant possession of the property.
Opinion
Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause
Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.
Opinion
Commercial landlord and tenant: Ban on evictions extended
Stephen Barclay the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has today announced that the ban on commercial evictions is to be extended to 25 March 2022.
Legal Update
Sara & Hossein Asset Holding Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 1521
A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease.
Opinion
A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease
The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.
Published Article
Adverse possession and registered land (Dowse v Bradford MBC)
The Land Registration Act 2002 radically changed the law of adverse possession in relation to registered land.
Opinion
A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power
When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.
Opinion
The Commons Treasury Committee has published its report on business rates. Are changes on the horizon?
The Treasury Committee has just published its report on its inquiry into the administration of business rates in England and, at first glance, it could be the catalyst to drive the change that many businesses have been calling for.
Opinion
The importance of three magic words: subject to contract
A recent case illustrates the importance of ensuring that all emails discussing the terms of a proposed acquisition are headed ‘subject to contract’.
Opinion
Does a breach of an obligation in an agreement for lease allow the tenant to refuse to complete the lease?
A tenant who does not want to be forced to complete a lease if an obligation in the agreement for lease is breached must provide expressly for this in the agreement.
Legal Update
Thorpe v Frank and another [2019] EWCA Civ 150
Repaving of land was sufficient evidence on its own to establish a claim for adverse possession of that land.
Legal Update
Tenant’s lease not frustrated by Brexit: Canary Wharf Ltd v European Medicines Agency
![Regency Villas Title Ltd and others v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd and others [2018] UKSC 57](/getattachment/536fcc78-0577-4e42-809e-7f8ca816d26b/fs-shutterstock_1919510069.jpg?variant=HeroImageTabletVariantDefinition)