Kensquare Ltd v Boakye [2021] EWCA Civ 1725
Time was of the essence for the purposes of a landlord’s notice to increase a tenant’s interim service charge contribution.
Time was of the essence for the purposes of a landlord’s notice to increase a tenant’s interim service charge contribution.
Facts
The tenant (B) held a 125 year lease of a flat. Under the lease, B was obliged to pay an interim service charge of £360 per annum by equal half yearly payments on 1 April and 1 October in each year. The lease went on to provide that this sum could be revised by the landlord:
“to such amount as it shall deem necessary in the light of expenditure reasonably anticipated for that year notice of such revision and adjustment to be served on the Lessee not less than one month prior to the commencement of that financial year.”
The financial year started on 1 April. The landlord (K) sent a letter to B in August 2019 requesting payment of half yearly instalments in excess of £180 per half year for periods running from 1 April 2018, 1 October 2018, and 1 April 2019.
Issue
Was time of the essence in relation to the letter sent by K to B revising the amount of the interim service charge payable by B (meaning that K was out of time to increase the amount payable by B)?
Decision
The presumption against time being of the essence was displaced in this case. The language clearly stipulated that notice was to be given “not less than one month” before the start of a financial year, the notice was in respect of “expenditure reasonably anticipated” for the year ahead and once notice was given, the revised sum would be payable half yearly during the financial year. It was therefore likely that the parties intended the advance notice requirement to be strictly adhered to.
Points to note/consider
- The Court of Appeal’s decision in this case was heavily influenced by the decision of the House of Lords in United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1977] 2 All ER 62. In that case, the House of Lords decided that there is a presumption in rent review clauses that time is not of the essence. Part of the rationale for that decision was that a landlord would be severely (and disproportionately) prejudiced if it was prevented from implementing a rent review just because it had failed to stick to a strict timescale set out in a lease.
In relation to interim service charges, a landlord would not be similarly prejudiced, since although it may not be able to increase the interim payments due from a tenant, time would not be of the essence for demanding payment of the final service charge at the end of the financial year (so the landlord would not actually be out of pocket). By contrast, for budgeting purposes, it is important that a tenant can be certain in advance of any service charge year how much it is going to have to pay on account for that year. - Following the United Scientific case, it has become common to state expressly in rent review clauses that time is not of the essence. In the light of this decision, where a service charge clause contains a timetable for what is to happen when, it might be sensible to state expressly whether time is or is not of the essence in relation to that timetable.
Contact

David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Platform Housing on landmark deal, creating over 300 affordable and sustainable homes
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Minster Property Group on major Suffolk affordable housing project
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Legal Update
The importance of three magic words
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Building our future town centres: advising local authorities on landmark acquisitions
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Legal Update
Assured shorthold tenancies for schools… let them have it!
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise façade engineering consultants Wintech Group on its acquisition of AVUS Consulting
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
Legal Update
Spring has sprung - update on the Charities Act coming into force
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Opinion
The long-awaited Renters Reform Bill is finally introduced into Parliament
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
Retirement housing: A solution to our care and housing crises?
Legal Update
Understanding the obligations and implications for open space land and development
Article
Interest from Asia boosts investor confidence in UK commercial real estate
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Legal Update
Regeneration: what role can universities play?
Opinion
Biodiversity Net Gain - Government publishes its metric consultation response & Natural England publishes their update biodiversity metric 4.0
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Opinion
‘Awaab’s Law’- a significant amendment to the Social Housing Regulation Bill
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Opinion
Will fixed recoverable costs in housing conditions claims see the light of day?
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Opinion
“A Modern Nuisance”
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Legal Update
Hillside – the end of drop in applications?
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Press Release
Former Mace Group Legal Director joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director of its Construction & Real Estate sector
Browne Jacobson has appointed Amy Chapman, the former Group Legal Director of global built environment experts Mace Group, as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Construction & Real Estate sector strategy board.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Bromley Council on the first social housing initiative of its kind to tackle homelessness
Opinion
Rent arrears post-Covid: What are the landlord’s options?
Since the beginning of the pandemic, landlords and tenants have experienced significant limitations in the way rent arrears could be pursued. We first saw the moratorium on the recovery of Covid related arrears, and more recently we’ve experienced the implementation of the Covid arrears arbitration scheme.