Macey v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd [2021] EWHC 2847 (Ch)
A landlord did not demonstrate the requisite intention required to oppose a statutory lease renewal underground (g).
A landlord did not demonstrate the requisite intention required to oppose a statutory lease renewal under ground (g).
Facts
The landlord (M) served a notice on its tenant in relation to a restaurant in Exeter under section 25 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the 1954 Act) opposing renewal on ground (g) (in section 30(1) of the 1954 Act) (the landlord intends to occupy the holding for the purpose of a business to be carried on by him). M’s stated intention was to use the property as a bistro.
Issue
Was the County Court judge correct in deciding that M had not shown a sufficiently formed intention of its plans?
Decision
M had not shown the subjective element required to satisfy ground (g). There was no reason to overturn the County Court judge’s decision, who had not been satisfied on the evidence that M’s plans had been fully formed. In particular, there was a lack of any significant financial commitment to progress any plans and the accountants (involved in business planning) and M’s children (said to be involved in the new business venture) had not been called to give evidence in support.
Points to note/consider
Whilst there is no new law here, the case is a useful reminder of the level of intention that a landlord has to show to satisfy both grounds (f) (the redevelopment ground) and ground (g). In particular, a landlord has to show:
- a subjective element – a firm and settled intention to bring about a certain state of affairs supported by evidence that is not tentative or indefinite (which is where M fell down here);
- an objective element – a reasonable prospect of being able to carry out its intention (i.e. the outcome is capable of achievement on an objective basis); and
- that its intention is not conditional – the intention would be conditional if the landlord has a firm and settled intention, but only so as to ensure the termination of the lease, so that if the tenant left voluntarily, the landlord would not proceed with its plans.
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Compliance obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation
Legal Update
Beyond shrinkage: Tackling the impact of retail crime
Legal Update
Essential updates to the RICS service charges in commercial property
Legal Update
Privacy implications of facial recognition technology (FRT) in retail security
Legal Update
CMA draft guidance for pricing transparency: What businesses should consider
Legal Update
Supply chain optimisation: How retailers are saving millions through supplier rationalisation
Legal Update
Digital trendsetters: The rise of AI influencers in fashion and beauty
Legal Update
Violence against shop workers and scam claims: Legal implications and practical advice
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises SKIMS on lease of a landmark Regent Street store
Legal Update
Government plans to ban upwards only rent reviews catch everyone by surprise
In Person Event
Navigating the future: Preparing for inheritance tax changes in 2026
Legal Update
Trade mark dispute risks: AI in legal document drafting
Guide
Investing in the UK and Ireland
Article
Inward investment in the UK and Ireland in 2025: The big picture
Legal Update
Inward investment in the UK and Ireland in 2025: Sector focus
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: Is it here yet?
Legal Update - Retail law roundup
Retail law roundup: June 2025
Legal Update
PuFin takes flight: Homes England launches new bank
Legal Update
Buy now pay later: The countdown to regulation is on
Legal Update
Distribution in the UK and the EU
Legal Update
The EU Deforestation Regulation: Implications and actions for the fashion industry
Opinion
Law Commission issues interim statement on reforms to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Opinion
Pride Month: A time to review DEI
Opinion
Employer redundancy guide: Sourcing alternative employment
Guide
Recovering insurance commission payments: tenant considerations post-Trocadero v Picturehouse
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Palatine on majority investment in fulfilmentcrowd
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson delivers record-breaking growth as strategic vision drives exceptional performance
Opinion
Is new AI tool the secret ingredient for ending planning delays? Answer: Almost certainly not
Press Release
Spending Review 2025: Browne Jacobson lawyers respond to Chancellor’s announcement
Press Release
Browne Jacobson a ‘discerning choice’ for clients with ‘IP-rich deals and complex litigation’ - as team ranks for both IAM Patent 1000 and IP Stars 2025
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
URS v BDW: Comment and practical implications for the building industry
Legal Update
ESG and sustainability report: Rethinking communication and credibility
Press Release
Majority of UK organisations remain committed to sustainability and ESG, says new research
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Corporate team in Ireland win award in Finance Dublin’s Deals of the Year 2025
Opinion
The Government urges housebuilders to ‘Get on and Build’
Legal Update
Exploring the impact of recent attacks on UK retailers and the future of cyber insurance
Legal Update
Ireland’s first Consumer Representative Action issued in the High Court
Legal Update - DMCC Act
The DMCC Act and consumer protection: Investigation, fines and other measures which the CMA can take
Legal Update - DMCC Act
The DMCC Act and consumer protection: Misleading pricing and drip pricing
