Macey v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd [2021] EWHC 2847 (Ch)
A landlord did not demonstrate the requisite intention required to oppose a statutory lease renewal underground (g).
A landlord did not demonstrate the requisite intention required to oppose a statutory lease renewal under ground (g).
Facts
The landlord (M) served a notice on its tenant in relation to a restaurant in Exeter under section 25 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the 1954 Act) opposing renewal on ground (g) (in section 30(1) of the 1954 Act) (the landlord intends to occupy the holding for the purpose of a business to be carried on by him). M’s stated intention was to use the property as a bistro.
Issue
Was the County Court judge correct in deciding that M had not shown a sufficiently formed intention of its plans?
Decision
M had not shown the subjective element required to satisfy ground (g). There was no reason to overturn the County Court judge’s decision, who had not been satisfied on the evidence that M’s plans had been fully formed. In particular, there was a lack of any significant financial commitment to progress any plans and the accountants (involved in business planning) and M’s children (said to be involved in the new business venture) had not been called to give evidence in support.
Points to note/consider
Whilst there is no new law here, the case is a useful reminder of the level of intention that a landlord has to show to satisfy both grounds (f) (the redevelopment ground) and ground (g). In particular, a landlord has to show:
- a subjective element – a firm and settled intention to bring about a certain state of affairs supported by evidence that is not tentative or indefinite (which is where M fell down here);
- an objective element – a reasonable prospect of being able to carry out its intention (i.e. the outcome is capable of achievement on an objective basis); and
- that its intention is not conditional – the intention would be conditional if the landlord has a firm and settled intention, but only so as to ensure the termination of the lease, so that if the tenant left voluntarily, the landlord would not proceed with its plans.
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Platform Housing on landmark deal, creating over 300 affordable and sustainable homes
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Maven Equity Finance on investment in Traverse Associates
Press Release
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join Browne Jacobson
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Legal Update
The importance of three magic words
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Building our future town centres: advising local authorities on landmark acquisitions
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Guide
How to manage supply contracts and avoid disputes
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
Retirement housing: A solution to our care and housing crises?
Legal Update
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Legal Update
Understanding the obligations and implications for open space land and development
Article
Interest from Asia boosts investor confidence in UK commercial real estate
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Legal Update
Regeneration: what role can universities play?
Legal Update
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to ‘buy now, pay later’ products
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Opinion
‘Awaab’s Law’- a significant amendment to the Social Housing Regulation Bill
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Opinion
Will fixed recoverable costs in housing conditions claims see the light of day?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Legal Update
Hillside – the end of drop in applications?
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic £48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
Press Release
Suzanne Harlow joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director
Law firm Browne Jacobson is pleased to announce that Suzanne Harlow has been appointed Non-Executive Director of its Retail, Consumer & Logistics sector.
Legal Update
Is this the end for free returns?
Earlier in the year a number of fashion retailers, boldly announced the introduction of a charging fee for returning any product purchased via their online store. Yet, despite this commercial, and perhaps somewhat controversial decision, at least one major fashion giant that adopted this approach has recorded ‘historic highs’ in its September profits. Browne Jacobson partner, Cat Driscoll who heads up the firm’s commercial team in Manchester and is also head of its Fashion & Beauty sector discusses whether this change has put the average consumer off and whether the days of free returns are long gone.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
