The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust. The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.
The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications. The CoA helpfully summarised the approach to be taken in classifying matters of professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS:
In this case, the CoA was satisfied that the fact that the Appellant was a doctor, was nothing more than the context in which the allegations arose – those allegations all related to her relationship with members of management and other colleagues or staff. The issues were therefore managerial (or personal) in nature, and not matters of professional misconduct.
The arguments put forward by the Appellant as to why the allegations could, in the alternative, amount to capability issues, were less sustained. The CoA was satisfied that allegations of this nature (rudeness, bullying, and intransigence with management), in the absence of any suggestion of any underlying medical conditions, had rightly been characterised as issue of conduct rather than capability.
This decision doesn’t change the previous approach taken to matters of professional misconduct but it is a helpful reminder of the approach that will be taken. Ultimately, the classification of whether a conduct issue is personal or professional remains a matter for the tribunal and courts – however, a documented reasoning as to classification during internal proceedings may well be helpful in demonstrating that the issue has been considered seriously by an employer. This reasoning should include an assessment as to whether an independent medical opinion would be useful in resolving the matters in dispute.
Employers may find, however, that more challenges to classification are raised during internal proceedings to avoid any detrimental inferences being drawn in subsequent legal proceedings.
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.