Download PDF Version
Introduction
We were pleased to welcome speakers Dr Nigel Ineson, General Practitioner, and Nicole Mottolini, Podiatrist and Clinical Fellow at NHS Resolution, to talk about diabetes and lower limb complications, and NHS Resolution’s recent thematic review of clinical negligence claims arising from these. You can find the full review here.
The thematic review, written by Nicole, is accompanied by a short video summary.
The video highlights two key points that NHS Resolution want to understand:
- Why principles of care that are well-reported in literature and guidance are not consistently applied; and
- How those care principles and the thematic review recommendations can be implemented more consistently to improve patient safety and care.
In particular, this session focused on:
- the context of diabetic lower limb claims
- the Review findings, and how to implement them to drive changes for patient safety, as well as reducing the costs of claims.
- sharing examples and experiences of best practice for learning from claims
- what good implementation looks like and how to overcome barriers to that
Our speakers:
Diabetes Mellitus and care of feet in General Practice
Dr Nigel Ineson, GP
Before we considered the findings of the Review, Dr Ineson explained why it is important to take the care of diabetic feet very seriously, both in general practice and in the multidisciplinary footcare clinic.
Diabetes UK data
- Prevalence of diabetes in the population is 7% (with at least 1-2% of the population being undiagnosed)
- There are over half a million diabetics in the UK
- Diabetes causes 24,000 premature deaths per year
- Treating diabetes costs £10 billion per year – equating to 10% NHS expenditure
- 8-10% of over 65s have diabetes
Diabetic footcare data
- Diabetes is the most common cause of non-traumatic limb amputation
- Diabetic foot ulcers precede more than 80% of amputations
- After a first amputation there is double the risk of a second
- Up to 70% of diabetics die within 5 years of having an amputation
- 50% die within 5 years of developing a foot ulcer
In Korea, where there is a high prevalence of diabetes, they have taken the approach of raising public awareness in innovative ways including art installations in public spaces.
Guidelines have been in place since 2000 (updated 2004 (NICE CG10) and 2015 (NG19)) as put together by RCGP, BDA, RCP and RCN. Under those Guidelines, referral to a multidisciplinary footcare team within 24 hours is mandatory where there is:
- New ulceration, new swelling or new discolouration
- Cellulitis
Examples of limb and life-threatening diabetic foot problems include ulceration with fever, signs of sepsis or limb ischemia; clinical concern of a bone or deep- seated soft tissue infection and gangrene.
The Guidelines recommend the provision of a multidisciplinary foot care service and clear local pathways. The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) programme reinforces this. However, not everywhere has a specialist care team accessible within 24 hours and the Guidelines are not consistently followed.
NHS Resolution’s recent thematic review of clinical negligence claims found:
- 64% of patients did not having ongoing consistent reviews by specialist footcare team (even once referred and reviewed)
- 52% of patients reviewed had no MDFT input at any stage
- 54% who had a major amputation were not decisions reached through MDFT
Dr Ineson explained that as a medico-legal expert he has reported on multiple cases involving diabetic feet with many proving indefensible. One of the challenges lies in following the guidelines where there is no or limited service provision.
Learning from Claims: Diabetes and lower limb complications – a thematic review of clinical negligence claims
Nicole Mottolini, NHS Resolution
Nicole gave an overview of the aims and findings of her thematic review and the recommendations. The practicalities of implementing the recommendations translate to other areas of medicine.
Aims
- Reduce variation of practice
- Improve standards of care for patients and staff
- Learn from harm, share learning, prevent future harm
~ 90 closed clinical negligence claims were reviewed by thematic analysis to:
- Identify qualitative themes and recurrent clinical patterns. A high level overview can help highlight issues and drive recognition of clinical and financial risk.
- Produce a report and recommendations including why issues are occurring and what can be done about it.
- Work collaboratively to implement changes and monitor their impact
Findings
Common issues seen in claims included problems with:
- Preventative care
- Pathways between primary care and specialist footcare teams
- Management of diabetic foot disease and specifically diabetic foot ulcers
- Biomechanics and offloading (pressure relief)
- Emergency Department attendance, admission into and discharge from hospital
- Management of peripheral arterial diseases
- Education, psychological support and patient compliance
Recurrent themes that arose out of the review were:
- Missed recognition of severity
- Lack of urgency in providing care
Contributed to by:
- Inconsistent use of terminology and non-descript language making it difficult to ascertain if situation improving or deteriorating
- Lack of pain response from patients resulting in lack of urgent response from clinicians
- The involvement of multiple disciplines not always resulting in integrated multi-disciplinary team working
- This resulted in a change in clinical picture not leading to a change in management plan.
Recommendations to implementation
There are many publications and a significant number of recommendations with similar themes. There needs to be clarity around who is responsible and accountable for implementation and a co-ordinated, consistent and supportive approach. Some key recommendations are as follows:
1. Education / Training
- Nationally, i.e. NHS England and NHS Improvement: footcare component included in all patient diabetes education programmes
- Collaboration with Health Education England and National Wound Care Strategy Programme
- Include consistent training at undergraduate level, thinking about what is taught in theory and how that translates into practice
- Locally: primary care, community podiatry and commissioners ensure education is delivered to patients and recorded and audited
2. Pathways and the provision of consistent services:
Nationally
- NHS England and NHS Improvement work with stakeholders to standardise the remit and function of Multi-disciplinary footcare teams (MDFT) and Foot Protection Services (FPS)
- All guidance and recommendations to include clear definitions and terminology e.g. defining what a diabetic foot ulcer or a limb threatening emergency is
- All guidance and recommendations to be clear, if use “if suspect” or “if clinical concern”, avoid variation in interpretation by specifying what evidence/results should first be gathered, to guide the level of concern or reassurance that follows
Locally
- Streamlined pathways across primary care, community, acute and inpatient teams
- Implementation of a “Pathway Lead” as a link across clinical teams and also between clinicians and commissioners
- Pathways and referral processes clearly documented, promoted and available on intranet/extranet
3. Biomechanics and offloading (pressure relief)
- All services provided evidence-based offloading
- Orthotists to be part of MDFT
- Offloading protocol documented with standard operating procedure.
4. Commissioning of services
- Across a number of services, commissioning teams are key partners to give system level support/oversight to ensure integration of multiple services across jurisdiction
- Integrated care boards: Ensuring a single pathway between primary care, community, acute and inpatient teams
- This includes working with NHS Digital to ensure aligned technology and access to patient notes
- Clinical teams supported to participate in national and local audits
5. Public health campaign
- Working with charities, including Diabetes UK, to promote awareness at local and national level. Promote importance of preventative lower limb care and empower patients
- Encourage open conversations to ensure morbidity and mortality associated with diabetic foot disease is recognised and discussed
6. Leadership and Workforce
- Clarify where decision-making capability comes from. Ensure there is an agreement, as to where overall accountability lies for that patient group. Without it, there can be good intention but a style of healthcare that seems resource-heavy but outcome-light.
- Working with NHS England and NHS Improvement as well as Health Education England, to ensure retention of Podiatrists and Orthotists
- Advancing clinical practice reflected in the remit and roles available – ensure decision making capability
- Clinicians involved in MDFTs have this planned into their roles, with at least one member of the MDFT having admitting rights
7. Participation in NDFA and local service audits
Nationally
- NHS England and NHS Improvement work with Integrated Care Boards to ensure all services participate in the National Diabetes Footcare Audit
Locally
- Reflecting on the care provided following all lower limb amputations and having the ability to capture and feedback learning across all teams involved in the care of the patient.
Quick tips/short term wins
- The International Working Group on Diabetic Feet has clear guidance that does includes terminology which could be included in a glossary
- NHS Resolution are producing a recommendation to implementation template for member Trusts to help track the implementation of recommendations. This practical tool aims to give an overview that can be easily reviewed, presented and escalated. It is hoped this will be published soon. The template will address case of need (where within clinical governance the issue has been identified), with a link to financial risk, quality of care, staff wellbeing and resource management. Once case of need is captured, the most appropriate recommendations can be identified. Trusts can then prioritise recommendations and check whether they are on track.
- NHS Resolution has a catalogue of resources to reflect recommendations – including some ready-made recommendations to be utilised at local level. We have also included a resources page at the end of this note.
Discussion
There was discussion around how Trusts disseminate learning from claims to both clinicians and the board to drive change. A number of examples were given
- Creation of “high-risk claims committee” – raising the profile of claims at board level and providing specific forum to consider learning from claims.
- Creation of “Learning from Litigation” – regular reviews of settled claims with completion and distribution of learning forms to relevant specialities. Then a Trust-wide meeting affording each speciality an opportunity to present their learnings.
- Regular reports submitted at board level covering lessons learned from claims.
- Closure emails to clinicians and relevant service managers highlighting lessons on conclusion of claims.
- Empowerment of clinical teams by sharing individual data around their claims profiles and learning points so they can drive improvements on the ground.
- Legal teams presenting to relevant services with case study slides highlighting common learning themes.
Whilst data can tell the story from a figures/financial perspective, the patient story is powerful and will often impact more at board level. Triangulate data and stories - teams do this on a day to day basis and through governance processes.
A number of resources are available to help Trusts
- Getting It Right First Time - GIRFT– sends claims- based packs to Trusts with information such as how many claims they are getting and how much it is costing. This can be shared with the board.
- Effective use of panel firms and NHS Resolution in terms of reporting – specifics can be drawn out from Panel reports to NHS Resolution on safety and learning aspects of specific claims.
We also discussed the importance of patient empowerment and helping them understand their conditions, and raising awareness of particular conditions within the public and the profession.
NHS Resolution safety and learning resources
NHS Resolution Thematic Reviews
- Five years of cerebral palsy claims - NHS Resolution
- Learning from suicide claims
- Learning from Emergency Medicine claims (3 reports)
- Diabetes and Lower Limb report
- Learning from General Practice claims
- The Early Notification Scheme Second Year Report
Other NHS Resolution Resources
- Duty of Candour animation
- Saying Sorry
- Being Fair
- Learning from medication error claims
- Learning from spinal infection claims
- Extravasation
How we can help
Despite the time lag between incident and claim, claims data provides a source of rich and valuable learning, especially when considered alongside other sources of data such as incidents and complaints.
Claims data can also be used as part of assurance processes to ensure learning has been embedded and to help drive improvements in incident reporting and investigation processes.
We can provide support with analysis of your claims and inquests data to identify key learning to share at Board level and with clinical teams. We also work with Trusts to review data from the NHS Resolution scorecard and GIRFT; information which may also be used to inform your organisation’s patient safety profile and Patient Safety Incident Response Plan.
We also have a team of dedicated specialists who have in depth knowledge of claims involving the treatment of diabetes and lower limb complications. Our experience and awareness of the issues and challenges that Trusts and other health and social care organisations face enable us to deliver pragmatic and practical advice when you need it.
If you would like to discuss how we can support your organisation please contact our dedicated Risk Management Lead, Amelia Newbold.
Key contact

Amelia Newbold
Risk Management Lead
Amelia.Newbold@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 908 4856
Our speakers

William Reynolds
Partner

Rebecca Coe
Senior Associate
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Compassionate Leadership and Culture
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: PSIRF and what it means for Independent Providers
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Implementing learning from claims to help improve patient safety - Focus on Diabetes and Lower Limb Complications
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Focus on emergency medicine
In our latest Shared Insights session, Focus on Emergency Medicine, chaired by Jennifer Fagin and Amelia Newbold, we were pleased to be joined by: Dr Alex Crowe, Deputy Director Incentive Schemes & Academic Partnerships, NHS Resolution and Consultant Nephrologist and Miss Susie Hewitt MBE, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Fitness to Practise Regime
In this session, our speakers discussed the Fitness to Practise Regime and how we can help.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners' Question Time
In this session, our speakers discussed fundamentals of disclosure, general points on disclosure & Post-Pandemic, interested Persons & Patient Safety Incident Response, and how we can help & Takeaway Tips.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody
In this session, our speakers discussed gave an overview of inquests in relation to deaths in custody and discussed three key themes; Documentation Provision, Communication, and Decision making. They also discussed Healthcare in a prison setting - manging the unique challenges.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The impact of Ockenden and implementation of the IEAs from ward to Board
In this session, our speakers discussed the final Ockenden report, the Midwifery Perspective, the Board Perspective, and the Wider national initiatives - Monitoring May.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Medical Mediation in Health and Social Care
In this session, our speakers discussed recognising and managing conflict, the benefits of mediation and the practicalities, and the safety and learning perspective.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum. Child Safeguarding in childcare proceedings
Our speakers looked at Child Safeguarding in childcare proceedings.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act: What does it mean for hospitals in the mental health and acute sector?
Our speakers looked at the Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act and what it means for hospitals in the mental health and acute sector.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental Health in Maternity
Our speakers looked at the legal framework for maternal mental health issues, the obstetrician’s perspective & the psychiatrist’s perspective.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Preparing for 2022 – the big issues for legal teams across health and social care
We were delighted to be joined by Dr Nigel Sturrock, Regional Medical Director for the Midlands at NHS England and NHS Improvement. He gave an overview of the pressures placed on the NHS by the pandemic, including the impact on urgent and emergency care, elective procedures and staffing.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum - Safe discharge and conveyance of patients
It is important to bear in mind the legal framework when planning discharge and conveyance plans but practicalities are also key.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time, part 2
The panel of experienced Coroners gave an outline of the current backlog and the pandemic recovery plan implemented in their jurisdiction.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Mental health patients: learning from incidents and inquests
Our speakers looked at themes arising from inquests, learning from participating in RCAs, the clinician’s perspective and a difficult case study.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Managing violent, abusive and racist patients
Rebecca Fitzpatrick, Helen Badger and Carl May-Smith, Partners at Browne Jacobson provided an overview of the legal frameworks in place that can assist Trusts when managing violent, abusive and racist patients
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Quarterly safeguarding forum - challenging families and best interests
In this Shared Insights session, we discuss difficulties faced by professionals when dealing with challenging family members and highlighted the legal frameworks and mechanisms that can be implemented to manage these behaviours in order to protect staff and keep the patient’s best interests at the centre of decision making.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Implementing the Ockenden Immediate and Essential Actions for safe maternal and newborn care
In this Shared Insights session we provided an overview of the implementation of the Ockenden Immediate and Essential actions.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: the future of interaction between health and social care
This session discussed the future of interaction between NHS Trusts and local government amidst a drive for better integrated care.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Learning from operating theatre claims and the challenges of service recovery post-pandemic
In this Shared Insights session, we discussed how prior to the pandemic, looking at the themes and learning arising from Operating Theatre claims between 2010 and 2020 and about the challenges faced by NHS Trusts as they seek to restore surgical and other services post-pandemic.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding forum - chronic eating disorders
In this Shared Insights session we listen to unique perspective and learning outcomes from dealing with eating disorder patients.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Inquests: recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic
In this Shared Insights session we discussed how different Coroners are approaching recovery from the pandemic.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared insights: The Paterson Inquiry: learning for the healthcare system
Implications for in-house legal, patient safety, clinical governance, workforce culture and large-scale reviews.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: the Covid-19 pandemic - workforce challenges for NHS trusts
This shared insight provided an insight into the legal issues arising from Covid-19 related illness, including long Covid and PTSD.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Update on the Early Notification Scheme and the role of Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB)
This shared insight discussed the changes to improve and streamline the investigation process for cases under the Early Notification (EN) Scheme (changes which came into effect from 1 April 2021).
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Covid-19 pandemic – the challenges for in house legal teams
This shared insight is on indemnity issues stemming from the Covid-19 pandemic and looks the issues that Trust legal teams have faced over the last 12 months during the pandemic.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: How to manage the "unmanageable"
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Key themes arising from obstetric claims and inquests
This shared insight looks at the NHS Early Notification team and helping Trusts with cases where babies have died following birth or where mothers have sustained severe injuries during childbirth, speaking of the consequences of these claims and the current focus on safety in maternity services.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Managing complex patients
Training - Shared Insights
Giving evidence at a Coroner’s inquest – guidance for clinical witnesses
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Confidentiality and medical records
We talk about the key legal principles that apply when processing requests for access to confidential information and gave some practical tips on how to deal with issues that might arise when Trusts are dealing with complex information requests.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Dealing with protesters on NHS premises
The importance of Trusts developing a written plan so that you are ready to act quickly if anti-Covid or anti-vaccination protesters come on to your site to protest.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead – HR and workforce challenges in 2021
Practical tips to share with healthcare HR colleagues on issues which may cause employee relations issues and litigation in 2021.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: What individuals and NHS organisations should expect from the regulators in 2021
An update on what individuals and NHS organisations should expect from the regulators in 2021.
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Claims update and look ahead to the issues that will shape the approach to claims in the NHS in 2021
Insights were shared on procedure, witness statements, withdrawing admissions and taking screenshots and photos in remote hearings.