In the last week or so we have seen the World Health Organisation raise its global risk assessment of COVID-19 from high to very high and we are now seeing an increasing number of cases of coronavirus in the UK.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication
In the last week or so we have seen the World Health Organisation raise its global risk assessment of COVID-19 from high to very high and we are now seeing an increasing number of cases of coronavirus in the UK. The UK Chief Medical Officers have raised the risk in the UK from low to moderate. All business are now turning their minds to the fact that if the disease continues to spread there will be a disruption to normal working patterns and should have contingency plans in place to cater for this. In the health and care sectors this creates challenges for those engaged in front line services as employers need to have adequate protection in place to manage the risks associated with contracting the virus, and also continue to provide care to patients.
We’ve set out below some answers to some of the most commonly asked workplace queries. These answers are based on a combination of employment law and current government guidance:
Closures have taken place where there has been a diagnosis of COVID-19 to on occasion allow for deep-cleans to take place or, in some cases, as a precautionary measure where a member of staff returning from a higher-risk area has experienced potential symptoms. Some employers are choosing to allow employees and workers (hereafter, for ease of reference, “employees”) to work from home, where this is possible. However, the Government is not advising more widespread closure at this stage.
Employers should adhere to the guidance issued by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in respect of travel bans and restrictions. Employers should also make sure that employees who are required to travel as part of their role are aware of up-to-date guidance and advice as to how to minimise any risks.
However, some employees will be concerned about the risks of becoming stranded (or quarantined) abroad if there are further concentrated outbreaks. Employers should therefore consider carefully whether travel is genuinely necessary and risk assess the need for overseas trips.
The Government is not currently advising that large-scale public events need to be cancelled and so the same logic would apply to work-related events. However, when considering risk levels, employers should bear in mind that if there was an attendee who has contracted COVID-19, such events may have the effect of spreading the infection more widely across the workforce. As with overseas trips, it would be sensible to risk assess the need for events during this period.
Individuals will need to self-isolate if they have returned from certain high-risk areas, even if they have no symptoms, and certain other specified areas if they are suffering from some symptoms. For a list of these areas, click here.
The employee should be asked to self-isolate and seek medical advice by telephone so that they can be assessed and tested. There is also online 111 advice available.
The employer will need to consider whether the employee’s actions in attending have increased the risks for other employees; whether any wider self-isolation is required, pending confirmation of the first employee’s infection-status; and whether any deep-clean or other action is required.
In many cases, an employer may not know that an employee has been advised to self-isolate. However, where it is aware (for example, the employee has returned from a business trip from a high-risk area, or from a trip which has received press coverage) then it should instruct the employee to leave the workplace and advise them to return to self-isolation. As above, the employer will also need to consider whether the employee’s actions in attending have increased the risks for other employees; whether any wider self-isolation is required, pending confirmation of the first employee’s infection-status; and whether any deep-clean is required.
The Government has confirmed that in extreme circumstances the new Regulations relating to Coronavirus give the police the power to arrest those who are ill or who are suspected of having COVID-19 and who have refused to self-isolate.
In line with recent ACAS guidance, employers should seek to understand from the individual why they believe this would be necessary and should handle genuine concerns raised by employees and try to resolve them to protect the health and safety of their staff.
As with any other illnesses, as part of normal risk assessments, employers should assess the risks to employees generally, and any increased risk for particular employees (such as pregnant employees, disabled employees or those with compromised immune systems). If there are no particular increased risks for the workforce (i.e. no confirmed or suspected cases), then employers could consider home-working, short-notice annual leave, or periods of unpaid leave for employees who are still concerned about attending. However, given that the risks of COVID-19 could continue for some time, such measures may not be feasible for staff providing direct clinical treatment or care in which case working from home may not be an option. Therefore, in this situation, we reiterate the above points regarding listening to the member of staff’s concern and assessing in particular, whether they fall into any of the high - risk categories, whether the concerns are genuine and whether there are other ways to perform the activities.
Employers will also need to be mindful of their obligations to consider reasonable adjustments for disabled employees who believe that their disability may place them at greater risk than non-disabled employees.
In the extreme scenario where an employee has not been diagnosed with coronavirus, does not fall into a high - risk category and/or does not have a disability, but refuses to work, an employer will need to consider very carefully how they respond and whether the matter can be dealt with under any disciplinary policy and specific advice should be obtained in those cases. It is important for employers to bear in mind and be responsive to the fact that, in some cases, individuals may feel so anxious that their anxiety renders them unfit to work and may lead to them being diagnosed as too unwell to work in which case they will be entitled to sick pay.
If an employee has COVID-19, they will be entitled to the same sick pay as they would for any other type of illness – SSP if they meet the eligibility requirements and potentially contractual sick pay if available.
If an employee was travelling for work and has been quarantined abroad, it is highly likely that they would remain entitled to full pay.
If an employee has been advised to self-isolate at home (either due to their travel or because they have come into close contact with someone infected with COVID-19), then there has been some speculation as to whether these individuals would be entitled to sick pay (as potentially, they may not be ill at all). Entitlement to contractual sick pay will depend upon the particular contractual wording which applies.
Entitlement to statutory sick pay does not just apply when a person is actually incapable of attending work – it also applies when they are deemed to be incapable of attending and this includes circumstances where they are excluded or they abstain from attending work as a result of a request or notice issued under an enactment. If they are self-isolating (or detained) as a result of the detention provisions under the Health Protection (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020, then this requirement would appear to be met (although these Regulations only apply to England). The stance taken by the Government is that SSP will apply. It indicated in the press briefing accompanying its Coronavirus Plan that this area would remain under review and, although there have not yet been any announcements about extending the scope of who is potentially eligible for SSP, the Government has confirmed that the scheme will be extended to give an entitlement to SSP from day 1 to those who are eligible.
If an employee is seeking to self-isolate in circumstances where they have not been advised or required to do so, then they would not be entitled to contractual or statutory sick pay.
If an employer requires employees to self-isolate in circumstances where those employees have not been advised or required to do so, then employees would remain entitled to full pay.
Employers will need to take a view on this. Strictly speaking, if an employee is off sick, these absences can be taken into account. However, employers may wish to remove any barriers against self-isolation as the potential consequences of COVID-19 being spread within the workplace are likely to be more significant than discounting self-isolation periods under an attendance procedure.
Employees (but not workers) have a statutory right to take reasonable time off for dependents in certain circumstances, including where a dependent falls ill or there is an incident at school (such as closure). This right is, however, unpaid and is typically intended for short-term periods to allow for alternative arrangements to be made.
Any wider rights would depend on the individual’s contract.
Lastly, employers should take steps to ensure that no employees are being targeted or treated less favourably on the grounds of their ethnic origin as a result of concerns or fears about COVID-19. Reminders in respect of appropriate behaviours and steps to tackle such behaviour may be required to ensure that employees are not subjected to discrimination or harassment.
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.