A landlord’s promise, a tenant’s power
When it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision.
Generally speaking, when it comes to leases, most people believe that landlords hold most of the power. However, in relation to long residential leases, the tables may well have recently turned in one respect at least following a recent Supreme Court decision. Simply put, a landlord is not now free to license works in breach of an absolute prohibition in a lease against carrying out alterations without the agreement of all the other flat tenants in a block where a landlord has covenanted to enforce similar obligations against all the tenants in the block (known as a mutual enforcement covenant).
As a result, it now appears that a tenant has increased control over its landlord’s decisions. A landlord is no longer freely able to agree works (that may be perfectly reasonable and well intentioned) falling within an absolute prohibition without first obtaining the agreement of all the tenants who benefit from a mutual enforcement covenant. In other words, tenants in a block may now have the power to control certain alterations a landlord may consent to. At the most extreme limits of such power, tenants could potentially prevent alterations occurring altogether since, in a block with a substantial number of flats, it is highly likely that at least one tenant will object to works being carried out.
This case demonstrates just how careful residential landlords in a block are going to have to be when receiving requests to license something which is otherwise absolutely prohibited under a lease. This applies not just in relation to alterations, but potentially extends to any absolute prohibitions under a lease (e.g. those relating to use). Mutual enforcement covenants are not a requirement under the current edition of the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook, so a landlord may wish to consider whether it enters into mutual enforcement covenants in the future, especially given how easy it could prove to breach those covenants.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
CJC review of litigation funding in England and Wales: Key findings and analysis
Guide
Recovering insurance commission payments: tenant considerations post-Trocadero v Picturehouse
On-Demand
Nuclear PSG webinar: Conflict avoidance on major projects
Legal Update
Ireland’s first Consumer Representative Action issued in the High Court
Legal Update
Navigating the streets: The legal landscape of low traffic neighbourhoods
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson appoints Bernhard Maier as Head of Arbitration
Legal Update
Case analysis: Enforceability of MOUs in commercial transactions
Legal Update
Sweetened dispute: The VAT battle over Mega Marshmallows
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson expands international disputes offering with new Head of Commercial Dispute Resolution in London
Legal Update
Rukhadze and others v Recovery Partners GP Ltd: Fiduciary duties and the duty to account for profits
Opinion
The Supreme Court provides welcome clarification on a problematic area of the law on adverse possession
Legal Update
Recent developments: Awards of non-material damages under the GDPR
Opinion
Awaab’s Law to take effect from October 2025
Opinion
Respect Orders: Will they actually make a difference?
Legal Update
“Lost Years” compensation principle reaches the supreme court
Press Release
Browne Jacobson appointed to Serco Group plc legal services panel
Legal Update
Dry January 2025: Legal considerations for manufacturers, hospitality and retailers
Legal Update
Insolvencies and claims under Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010
Opinion
Can an employee complain too much?
Training
Mock inquest training course
Published Article
Johnson et al v FirstRand Bank: Judgment sends warning across financial services intermediation
Legal Update
Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd: Opening the floodgates to mass litigation?
Legal Update
Know your dispute resolution clauses: Key take-aways from Kajima v Children’s Ark and Lancashire Schools v Lendlease
Opinion
Law Commission initial consultation published on reforming Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Legal Update
EasyGroup proceedings defeated by jurisdictional challenge
Legal Update
New amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules and their impact
Training
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Modification of contracts existing before the go-live date of the Procurement Act 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Decisions of the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel
Opinion
Publication of The Renters’ Rights Bill: Major changes to the private rented sector are on their way
Legal Update
Motor finance complaints on hold: Why now is the time for strategic action
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Contract management and performance
Legal Update
Extended s20 voluntary care isn’t always a breach of human rights
Legal Update
Alternative dispute resolution: The future of ADR in the UK legal system
Opinion
Settling future claims: Insights from Clifford v IBM 2024
Legal Update
Multi-occupancy building insurance: Latest tribunal decision
Legal Update
How can you make a 'deathbed will'?
Opinion
New online system streamlines maternity services at The University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
Case update: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Homes and Communities v Grey GR Limited Partnership
