0370 270 6000

What we have learned about costs claims in child abuse cases

22 January 2020

These claims are far more commonplace than they were, and the list of Firms who offer to act for claimants is always growing.

The Courts are slowly accepting that these cases are very much now in the mainstream of litigation, they still do have their quirks which many judges consider separate them from the pool of general personal injury litigation. This is what our costs team have noted in dealing with those cases.

Solicitors

A claimant does not have to travel far to find a solicitor offering to dealing with an abuse case these days. As such defendants should only be paying the solicitors rates away from each claimant’s home address where it would be reasonable for a claimant to instruct them.

It is not all good news for defendants, though.

It is not uncommon for the court to allow Grade A or B rates for dealing with child abuse claims, particularly when it comes to taking instructions from a client or advising on quantum.

Equally, however, on such cases the court expects to see a significant degree of delegation to Grade C and D lawyers for the day to day work on the file and obtaining and reviewing medical records.

The question of whether these rates should be uplifted remains a risk for both parties but it should be remembered, there are far more junior lawyers in the criminal and family courts dealing with much factually worse and equally sensitive cases at far lower (i.e. LSC) rates.

Records

The records in social care cases are important, often voluminous and can cover large periods of time – far more than one would expect in a standard personal injury case.

That does not mean that they require the attention of a Grade A, B, or even C lawyer to review them. More often than not trainee Solicitors; paralegals; or lawyers of a ‘Grade D’ status are more than capable of undertaking this task, and the Court is not unsympathetic to Defendants’ submissions to this effect on assessment.

Practice note: If you really want to save costs, having your own lawyers ensure records are disclosed in a reasonably presentable condition will save you the additional costs of the Claimant’s solicitor doing the same task ( at higher rates) before being sent to their expert.

Experts

It is rare that abuse cases require more than two experts – a psychiatrist on quantum and a social care expert on liability.

Historically, the pool of experts was small, but it has grown significantly (with variable quality) in recent years - although some of the most practiced experts in these disciplines are charging even more than the lawyers by the hour for their reports.

But, when presented with a claim for such costs, it does not automatically follow that such fees are proportionate in the eyes of the court.

The majority of abuse cases settle for modest sums. An expert fee of £5,000 for a settlement figure of £10,000 is unlikely to be seen as reasonable. Both parties need to cut their cloth accordingly to ensure that the costs of their experts are proportionate to the damages recovered.

Counsel

Counsel is no exception. What was once a specialised (predominantly London based) pool, now operates nationwide.

But, does every case require an advice or a conference with counsel?

Given the potential remit for dispute on damages in light of any psychological or psychiatric damage suffered (or, perhaps, the risk of a Solicitor being sued if they undervalue a case) in our experience the Court tends to be sympathetic to a modest advice, but does baulk at JSM fees commonly sought at £7500 or thereabouts.

Training and events

1Feb

ICS Development Microsoft Teams

This one-hour webinar will include an overview of new legislation in a developing ICS, as well as the key features for developing integrated care partnerships, how local authorities can work collaboratively with health organisations, and how ICS structures can be developed to support key system priorities.

View event

3Feb

COPs 26 and 27: Reflecting Back and Looking Forward – What environmental developments and commitments can we expect in 2022 and beyond? Zoom

Join us for this webinar. Issues to be considered: summary of the COP26 outputs, predictions for further commitments at COP27, and more.

View event

Focus on...

Press releases

High Court strikes out ‘failure to remove’ Human Right Act claim against two local authorities

The High Court has considered the application of the Human Right Act to local authorities in cases where they are carrying out their statutory child protection functions after dismissing the latest ‘failure to remove’ claim against two local authorities.

View

Legal updates

Employment law in 2022

As we move into 2022, we take a look at what employment law developments may be on the cards for the coming year.

View

Legal updates

Exclusion grounds under the new procurement regime

A range of questions were subject to consultation on the grounds for excluding bidders from a procurement process. We consider some of the key proposals which will be taken forward in the new regime.

View

Published articles

Construction needs to do more to reduce carbon emissions

More needs to be made of these procurement routes, with clients honouring the original concept rather than watering down concepts.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up