Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?
The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.
Introduction
The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.
In one page the bill proposes to amend the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) so that the Financial Conduct Authority’s (“FCA’s”) statutory rule-making powers include “the power to introduce a duty of care owed by authorised persons to consumers in carrying out regulated activities”.
The “duty of care” is defined as “an obligation to exercise reasonable care and skill when providing a product or service”.
A “consumer” is defined as per the Consumer Rights Act 2015 s 2(3): “an individual acting for purposes that are wholly or mainly outside that individual's … business …”
<p">This definition is narrower than that in FSMA, which applies to “persons who use … services provided by authorised persons in carrying on regulated activities …” (see FSMA s 1G, H(2)), so includes business purposes and corporates. </p">What’s the point?
Neither the terms of the Bill nor or commentary around it make its purpose clear.
The FCA’s view is that the power set out in the Bill is neither necessary nor beneficial for the FCA to meet its statutory objective as to “securing an appropriate degree of protection for consumers” (see FSMA s 1C(1)).
According to the FCA’s ‘Feedback Statement’ from April 2019 (FS 19/2), it has, over a number of years been:
“… told … that our regulatory framework, … may not be sufficient or applied effectively enough to prevent harm to consumers …
- Some [have] suggested we introduce a duty of care to reduce harm and ensure that firms avoid conflicts of interest, as well as supporting firms’ longer-term cultural change …
- However, [others] suggested existing … rules already provide sufficient protection for consumers and impose the same requirements on firms as a duty of care would.”
FS 19/2 resulted from a ‘Discussion Paper’ (DP 18/5) that the FCA issued in 2018 for “an open discussion about the potential merits of a duty of care, [and] … to give us a deeper understanding of the issues, and the way in which stakeholders perceive them …”
The material points from the FCA’s summary of the feedback were:
- “Most … arguments … for and against a statutory duty of care [assumed] that individual consumers would have the ability to take court action to recover losses that resulted from a breach of that duty (i.e. be ‘actionable’) …”
- The FCA identified risks from creating an actionable duty, including:
- “complexity … uncertainty … delay … cost”;
- inconsistency between judicial and FCA decisions, with the potential for the former to constrain the latter; and
- “a negative, adversarial effect on firm/consumer relationships”.
- Moreover, the FCA stated that “Most respondents do not support a statutory duty …”
- There was a “small group” that did want a statutory duty because
- of “its ability to re-set the context in which financial services are delivered and regulated …
- [it could be] a critical step towards restoring consumer trust …
- [and has a] unique capacity to drive change by providing [a] … standard of care that sits above the rest of the regulatory and legal framework … to which everyone would have regard at all times.”
The FCA’s response to the feedback was:
- “We recognise [the arguments of some] that a [primary legislative] duty of care … would
- be more effective than one created with our existing rule-making powers …
- have greater visibility because it would sit above our Principles and rules [set out in the FCA Handbook] [but]
- We do not consider that this is a sufficient basis for making changes to primary legislation …”
The FCA’s clear preference was for the following “options … most likely to deliver a higher degree of consumer protection … :
- reviewing how we apply the regulatory framework – particularly … the Principles and how we communicate with firms about this [and]
- new/revised Principles to strengthen and clarify firms’ duties to consumers, including consideration of the potential merits and unintended consequences of a potential private right of action for Principles breaches.”
By contrast, the Bill introduces a change at primary level to expand the FCA’s existing powers without obliging the FCA to deploy such power. Nor does the Bill clarify if consumers may bring private law actions against firms for alleged breach of the duty of care. As the Bill heads towards more detailed parliamentary scrutiny, practical challenges await.
This article was co-authored by Gabriel Downey - Trainee Solicitor, Charlotte Gregory - Senior Associate and Jeremy Irving - Partner and Head of Financial Services.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Published Article - Consumer Duty
How ‘operational resilience’ enables compliance with the ‘consumer duty’ and ‘vulnerable customers’
Legal Update
Mind the GAP - FCA warning to GAP insurers
Legal Update
Making numbers easy - complying with the Customer Understanding objective
Published Article
Three peaks of consumer protection: Part two — intolerable harm
Published Article
The three peaks of customer protection: How ‘operational resilience’ enables compliance with the ‘Consumer Duty’ and ‘Vulnerable Customers’
Legal Update
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Legal Update
Code of Conduct for ESG data and ratings providers
Legal Update
All the pieces of the conduct puzzle: Governance, culture, D&I, innovation
Legal Update
Investors groups are calling for action from the Government
Legal Update
The FCA’s anti-greenwash proposals
Legal Update
Floating offshore wind pipeline potential
Legal Update
Environmental Act 2021 – statutory requirement to submit targets not complied with
Legal Update
FCA Financial Lives survey: Socio- demographics and financial vulnerability
Legal Update
Disability and access in banking
Legal Update
Progress report on climate-related disclosures
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 1 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Legal Update
FCA warns that vulnerable to scams amid cost of living crisis
Legal Update
FinTech and financial inclusion
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Rcapital on acquisition of two managing general agents by insurance investment specialist, Primary Group
Press Release
Browne Jacobson launches innovative legal and compliance solution for insurance intermediaries
With the fast pace of legal and regulatory changes, Browne Jacobson is launching its ‘In-house for intermediaries’ service for brokers and MGAs.
Legal Update
“Original cause” – Aggregation clauses in insurance contracts – Spire Healthcare v Royal & Sun Alliance [2022] EWCA Civ 17
A recent Court of Appeal judgment has provided some useful and much-needed clarity on the interpretation and application of aggregation clauses in insurance contracts.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises London based insurtech business Laka on significant series A round investment
Browne Jacobson’s national corporate tech lawyers have advised specialist insurtech business Laka on its $12m series A investment round. The cash injection will allow Laka to expand its operations across Europe and support its new retail partners based in Belgium, France and Germany.
Published Article
General insurance conduct and enforcement risk: Alsford Page & Gems Ltd - reading between lines on root causes of censure
Legal Update
Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic
The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.
Legal Update
Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations
With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.
Legal Update
Coronavirus (COVID-19) – business interruption insurance considerations
With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the potential impact on their businesses if they are forced to temporarily close as a result of the outbreak.
Opinion
Credit broking: know your permissions
Legal Update
Legal and regulatory newsletter - February 2020
Read our latest insurance newsletter for our clients and contacts across the financial services market with quarterly updates and insights on topical legal and regulatory issues.
Published Article
Good insurance business # 1 - Insurance Product Value and the duty to act in the best interests of customers: risks from intermediary remuneration
On 19 November 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) published “Finalised guidance” (FG19/5) for “insurance product manufacturers and distributors”.
Legal Update
Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?
The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.
Legal Update
Legal and regulatory newsletter - October 2019
The aim of the newsletter is to provide our clients and contacts across the financial services market with quarterly updates and insights on topical legal and regulatory issues.
Legal Update
FCA considers regulating all promotions and warns of “high risk” mini-bonds and peer-to-peer IFISAs
Following an “explosion” in online promotions for high yield investment opportunities, the FCA says a “strong case” could be made for regulating how investment products are marketed to retail investors.
Legal Update
Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019
The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.
Legal Update
Lloyd’s new rules for delegated authority business – a change for the better?
Lloyd’s has announced changes to its rules on delegated authority (DA) business, aiming to embrace technology and a more risk-based approach.
Legal Update
FCA Enforcement Annual Performance Report for 2018/19
Last month the FCA published the FCA Enforcement Annual Performance Report for 2018/19.
On-Demand
Insurtech UK and Browne Jacobson Legal Survival Guide on Corporate Finance and Regulation
Bringing together the great and the good of the insurtech world, we take a look back to earlier this summer when Insurtech UK invited their approved legal partners Browne Jacobson LLP, Locke Lord UK LLP and Capital Law to present as part of the Best Practice Series.
Opinion
SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement
On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.
Legal Update
The disappearance of LIBOR
Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.