This article is the first in a series aimed to help firms get to grips on a practical basis with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ framework.
This article was published by Thomson Reuters.
This article is the first in a series aimed to help firms get to grips on a practical basis with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ framework.
On 31 July 2023 the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules on the ‘Consumer Duty’ (CD) take effect. The corner stone for the new rules will be Principle 12’: “A firm must act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers” (not limited to “consumers”).
The principal framework is set out from PRIN 2A.1 (see eg via the FCA Handbook’s ‘timeline’ feature).
The rules in PRIN 2A include the “Cross-cutting obligations”, with the following at PRIN 2A.2.1 R: “A firm must act in good faith towards retail customers.”
‘Good faith’ is not defined in the rules, nor is it a concept used previously in FCA regulation (excluding ‘utmost good faith’, a specific feature of insurance contract law addressed in PERG 6.6). However, the FCA gives guidance as to the attributes of good faith.
It’s worthwhile considering how the above terms and concepts have been previously used by the FCA.
‘Customers’ interests’ have been a feature of mortgage regulation since 2016 (see MCOB 2.5A), insurance since 2018 (see ICOBS 2.5), and funeral plans since July 2022 (see FPCOB 2.1.2) with rules to the effect that “A firm must act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its customer.”
The above rules have not been put to the test through reported enforcement proceedings, although the concept of ‘customer’s best interests’ was used by the FCA in relation to a failure by an asset management firm to manage conflicts of interest fairly (GAM International Management Limited).
This concept has been used in mortgage regulation since 2016 (MCOB 3A.8.4R): “A firm must not in any financial promotion of a regulated sale and rent back agreement exploit the vulnerable nature or circumstances of any customer who may be in financial difficulties and at risk of losing his or her home. As such, the firm must avoid using phrases or terms such as "fast sales", "rescue" or "cash quickly" or any other similar expression.” This has not however been tested through reported enforcement.
This concept is a feature of ICOBS 6B (ie at 6B.2.40(5): “A firm should not selectively close individual channels in order to take advantage of the premium difference between channels when setting an equivalent new business price”). It is a feature of the FCA rules against ‘price-walking’ which took effect at the start of this year. As above, the provision has not been tested.
This is a form of conflict of interest – addressed for example at SYSC 10.1.5 G. The concept can be illustrated by forms of activity in the capital / wholesale and investment markets. For instance, COBS 11.3.7A provides that:
“Investment firms shall not carry out a client order or a transaction for own account in aggregation with another client order unless ... it is unlikely that the aggregation of orders and transactions will work overall to the disadvantage of any client whose orders is to be aggregated ... [and such disadvantage] ... is disclosed to each client ... in relation to a particular order ...”
The 2015 fine of Barclays Bank PLC for FX market misconduct involved trading practices which disadvantaged, or risked disadvantaging, the bank’s customers, and gave benefits to the bank - or at least certain of its employees.
The FCA published FG22/5 by way of non-Handbook guidance alongside PS22/9, which set out the new CD rules and gave feedback on the prior (CP21/36) consultation responses. Some of the additional guidance contains practical (albeit anonymised) examples of acting (or not) in good faith, including:
“An insurance firm has a complex claims process which deters many customers from pursuing claims ... [including] a requirement for customers to provide hard copies of all evidence. The firm refuses to consider any requests from customers to waive this ... [a] firm should not impose unreasonably restrictive, rigid or arbitrary administrative requirements ...”
By contrast: “A bank identifies where its customers do not have sufficient funds in their accounts to make regular direct debit payments. [It] sends its customers a short, effective communication through its mobile app or via text message ... allowing them time to deposit the funds needed to make payments and avoid additional charges”
It is possible that arguments may yet develop in both the regulatory and litigation context to the effect that the FCA’s rules cause many contracts in the FS markets to contain duties of good faith as a matter of law, even if the contracts themselves do not contain express provisions in this regard.
The attributes of good faith identified by the FCA for firms party to FS (product) contracts are similar to the hallmarks of a legal obligation of good faith:
(see eg Unwin v Bond [2020] EWHC 1768 (Comm).
Good faith in FS contracts has been recently considered in terms of the ‘duty to act rationally’: making decisions by taking into account all, and only, matters that should be taken into account and not coming to a conclusion that no reasonable decision maker could ever have come to (see eg UK Acorn Finance Ltd v Markel (UK) Ltd [2020] EWHC 922: insurer obliged to act rationally when deciding if it was ‘satisfied’ that any non-disclosure was unintentional).
While the legal concept of good faith is not generally regarded as unduly demanding, there is the potential for FS products to have consequences not previously considered.
View the second article in this series here.
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
This article is the second in a series to help firms take a practical approach to complying with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ (CD) framework. The article summarises what it seems the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking to achieve from the applicable rules (section 2 below) and potential complications arising from legal considerations (section 3).
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
The Digital Services Act (the “DSA”) has today (27 October) been given the go-ahead by the EU Council and will enter into force by early 2024.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have announced they will be carrying out a programme of inspections to primary and secondary school establishments from September 2022. The inspections will assess how schools are managing the risks from asbestos and meeting the Duty to Manage requirements, set out in Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
This article is the first in a series aimed to help firms get to grips on a practical basis with the ‘cross-cutting rules’ within the new ‘Consumer Duty’ framework.
The Government has announced a change to the categorisation of “small” businesses to reduce the amount of regulatory compliance (or “red tape”) required. Currently, SMEs (those with fewer than 250 employees) are exempt from certain regulations – such as the obligation to comply with gender pay reporting. With effect from 3 October, these exemptions will be widened to apply to businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.
The use of social media platforms and applications can have overwhelmingly positive benefits for public bodies. However, regulatory action recently taken by the Information Commissioner, has highlighted various pitfalls that public bodies should seek to avoid if allowing staff to use social media as a communication tool.
Browne Jacobson’s corporate finance lawyers have advised leading private equity investor, Rcapital Partners LLP (Rcapital) on its majority stake acquisition of managing general agents (MGAs), UK General Insurance Ltd (UKG) and Precision Partnership Limited (PPL) alongside Montague Investment Group LLP who are taking a minority stake.
Whilst the weather conditions are predicted to be cooling down this week, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is asking employers and businesses to consider adapting to recurrent warmer weather conditions for the safety and benefit of their staff. It asks employers to ensure that extreme heat becomes a firm part of longer term risk management. Climate change in any event is something all businesses will need to consider as the warmer weather becomes more frequent - extreme heat is something that will impact employers on a day to day basis.
In this session, our speakers discussed the Fitness to Practise Regime and how we can help.
Bridget Tatham, a specialist defendant insurance lawyer at Browne Jacobson has been honoured at this year’s Birmingham Black Lawyer (BBL) Excellence Awards, having been named Lawyer of the Year. Bridget was also shortlisted for BBL’s Diversity Champion 2022.
The Building Safety Act 2022 received Royal Assent on 28 April 2022 (“Act”). The government has described the reforms introduced by the Act as “the biggest changes to building safety regulation in a generation”. For once the hype is justified.
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has released a report setting out the impact of new and changing regulations arising from the pandemic on small businesses across the UK.
We have created a summary of the recommendations and consistent themes which we are now starting to see becoming more embedded in public sector procurement practices.
On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.
Browne Jacobson has announced its financial results for 2021-22 with revenues up 11 per cent year-on-year to £94m, up from £85m. It marks the 13th consecutive year of growth with a 59 per cent increase in revenues since 2015 (£59m).
As the Grenfell Inquiry continues, how have the Phase 1 recommendations changed the fire safety and building safety landscape?
Here we look at the potential concerns the legislation could have for lenders and the impact it may have on documenting secured funding agreements.
As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.
Public sector and private sector organisations, particularly those who meet the £36 million threshold, are encouraged to review their approach to combating modern slavery in their organisation and its supply chains before the Modern Slavery Bill becomes law.
A lawyer and a HR business partner from law firm Browne Jacobson have been announced as winners of the WeAreTheCity’s Rising Stars Awards 2022.
A brief introduction for clients for the Damages Claims Portal.
In anticipation of the adoption of the Building Safety Bill, our specialist compliance and regulatory team will give an overview of the measures proposed in the Bill.
With the fast pace of legal and regulatory changes, Browne Jacobson is launching its ‘In-house for intermediaries’ service for brokers and MGAs.
The new regime introduced by the Act will take shape over the next 18 months, but those who design, build or manage high rise buildings are being urged to get ready for the changes to be introduced through the act.
There are a number of factors which have contributed to the crisis including the huge increase in wholesale natural gas prices, which have risen some 250% since the start of 2021. Since the start of last year, over 30 energy firms have gone bust in the UK alone.
Financial crime is an increasing threat to all organisations. The modes of facilitating fraud have become easier. Being a victim of fraud as an organisation risks significant financial consequences, but also serious reputational harm and loss of stakeholder confidence.
In March the government proposed a number of changes to the Building Safety Bill. The new amendments propose additional protection for leaseholders to prevent them from being charged for cladding work if they own up to three properties.
From 6 April 2022, right to work checks on all migrant or settled prospective employees must be online and checks on British or Irish nationals will be manual (free) or digital (charged for).
