Supply chains continue to be impacted by a variety of factors including inflation, the vulnerability of global logistics chains, and the growing need to enhance sustainability. In the retail sector, supply chains can be complex. Therefore, careful management of supply chain risks is essential given that disruption can resonate throughout the supply chain, leading to significant time, cost, operational and liability implications. By taking pre-emptive steps like undertaking a review of the supply chains, businesses can identify and take steps to mitigate areas of risk.
Based upon our significant experience advising retail clients on supplier disputes, we have set out our top tips to help minimise potential supply chain risks/disputes.
Undertake an audit of the supply chain
This will identify any risks and allow a business to put measures in place to reduce exposure.
Review the contract terms
Ensure that key clauses (such as force majeure, retention of title, representations and warranties, exclusivity, payment rights, schedule and delivery terms, limitations of liability and termination rights) are reviewed to ensure that they are comprehensive. All contractual documentation needs to be readily accessible.
Consider the viability of the contract
If contracts are no longer operationally or financially viable, businesses should try to re-negotiate or vary the terms. Given supply contracts are often long in length, it would be wise to see whether the parties can work together to find a workable solution. A negotiated solution could take a variety of different forms, depending upon the commercial strategies of the parties. This could include, for example, amending the length of the contract, decreasing the committed volume, and/or changing the pricing structure. Reaching a negotiated solution is often the best scenario for both parties. If the parties do agree to vary the contract, then ensure that any variation is carried out in accordance with the contract and properly documented. If either is not feasible then businesses could consider assignment or termination.
Undertake reviews of the suppliers
Regularly reviewing the financial and business performance of the suppliers is essential. Looking solely at the service/products they provide will not give businesses the full picture of their resilience to external factors. Financial issues are often the root cause of deteriorating supplier performance. 1st tier suppliers may also be taking the brunt of problems lower down the supply chain, with buyers only able to see late deliveries and decreasing quality from tier 1. This lack of supply chain visibility is a key driver of risk, hampering a buyer’s ability to anticipate and mitigate disruption.
Communicate
It’s important that the parties keep communicating even if there has been disruption. Continuing to talk might just avoid a dispute later down the line and preserve the commercial relationship.
Have a business continuity plan
Creating and implementing a business continuity plan will help to identity risks (in advance) and minimise disruption/impact. Such a plan might include implementing a dual sourcing strategy; using both regional and global suppliers; and/or pursuing 1st and 2nd tier supplier collaboration.
It is also important that businesses give their team training so that they can anticipate supply chain risks, voice their concerns, and embrace risk management processes (including the business continuity plan) which will be beneficial in dealing with disruptions.
Take steps to preserve the supply chain
Businesses should also consider steps to preserve the supply chain if the other party refuses to cooperate. This could range from seeking provisional measures to compel performance of the contract through to securing alternative supply to mitigate losses.
Consider the dispute resolution procedure
If there is a dispute, then businesses should check any dispute resolution clause within the contract and invoke the prescribed procedure. Most contracts contain a dispute resolution clause, which is often found towards the end of the contract (and forgotten about!). The dispute resolution clause usually specifies how disputes are to be resolved and this may include: (1) a series of escalating stages through which the parties will attempt to resolve the dispute, i.e. a meeting with the manager and then escalation to a senior manager; (2) negotiation; (3) mediation (optional or compulsory); and (4) expert determination, arbitration or litigation. Generally, whichever procedure is specified in the contract, the parties are required to follow it to save time and avoid incurring unnecessary legal costs. It can often be possible to reach a resolution with a supplier through the dispute resolution procedure without matters escalating.
Ultimately, taking a pro-active approach to supply chain risk is important to minimise disruption and avoid disputes (and maintain commercial relationships).
If you have any queries arising from the issues raised in this article, then please contact Chloe Poskitt at chloe.poskitt@brownejacobson.com.
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Maven Equity Finance on investment in Traverse Associates
Legal Update
D.I.P.T. Limited and Others v Sanglier Limited v Apollo Chemicals Limited [2023] EWHC 426 (TCC) – In the middle of the supply chain
Opinion
Vicarious liability of amateur sports teams for player on player injuries
Press Release
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join Browne Jacobson
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on sale of professional indemnity MGA One Commercial Specialty Limited
Legal Update
Part 36 combined offers – when are they beaten?
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Legal Update
Developers pushed further on remediation by the Responsible Actors Scheme
Legal Update
Employment alternative dispute resolution
Legal Update
Insolvency practitioners and trustee immunity
Guide
How to manage supply contracts and avoid disputes
Press Release
Browne Jacobson grows inheritance and trust dispute practice with partner hire
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Legal Update
Subsidy control lessons to be learnt from Bulb
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Published Article
O Shaped mindset when working with witnesses
Opinion
Mediation – remote or in person?
Opinion
Confirmation of Acas early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Legal Update
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to ‘buy now, pay later’ products
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Legal Update
Warranties and indemnities update
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Legal Update
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
Legal Update
Embargoed judgments: A professional word of caution
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Opinion
Implementation of the Fire Safety (England) Regs 2022
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Opinion
Civil court litigation 2023: Reforms on the horizon
Press Release
Manchester dealmakers advise Maven Capital Partners on £1m investment in fintech disruptor Nivo Solutions
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises sustainable waste solution provider Covanta Europe on its new Wellingborough based aggregate processing plant
Legal Update
Long live king coal?
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.