Bernel Ltd v Canal and River Trust [2021] EWHC 16 (Ch)
A developer was unable on the facts to establish a right to drain onto its neighbour’s land without permission.
A developer was unable on the facts to establish a right to drain onto its neighbour’s land without permission.
Facts
The claimant (B) owned a development site comprising an existing dwelling (known as Ivy House), its garden and immediate curtilage and a larger adjoining field. B intended to construct nine new dwellings on the site and wanted to drain surface and foul water onto neighbouring land of the defendant (CRT) (and then into a feeder canal for the River Dane). However, the parties could not agree terms for such drainage.
An old drainage pipe of uncertain origin serving other properties ran through the development site onto CRT’s land.
Issues
- Was the drainage pipe a culverted natural watercourse into which B, as a riparian owner, could discharge surface water and treated foul water from the development site?
- If not, had B acquired by prescription an easement to discharge surface water and treated foul water in the same way?
Decision
- For there to be a watercourse giving rise to riparian rights, there had to be a stream of water flowing in a defined channel or between something in the nature of banks. Although the stream may occasionally run dry, there must be a course (marked on the earth by visible signs) along which water would flow. A dry channel which is only filled during temporary flooding is not a watercourse giving rise to riparian rights.
In this case, there was no indication from old Ordnance Survey maps of any stream or watercourse running along the route of the pipe and no reference to any watercourses when works were carried out to the River Dane feeder canal in the early 20th century. There was therefore no evidence to indicate that the pipe was a culverted watercourse.
- B’s claim to a prescriptive easement failed as there was no evidence of long user. There was no evidence of any significant amounts of surface water from the site draining off by use of the pipe. Moreover, Ivy House was connected to a septic tank which did not link into the pipe, so there was no evidence of foul water having used the pipe.
Points to note/consider
- Whilst B lost the case on the facts, what is of greater interest to developers in general is the judge’s decision on other related issues had he initially found in favour of B.
This case is a reminder of the common law concept of riparian rights. Where a watercourse runs through land or along the boundary of land, the landowner enjoys what are known as riparian rights (unless there is evidence that the watercourse is owned by a third party). This includes a right to have water go from your land without obstruction. So had a watercourse been found to exist, whilst it could not have increased the flow of water by artificial means, reasonable drainage operations by B would have been permitted.
The judge considered that draining surface water and treated foul water in accordance with an approved scheme permitted by the Environment Agency would have amounted to a reasonable drainage operation and would therefore have fallen within the rights available to a riparian owner.
- Even if B had been able to establish a prescriptive drainage easement, the judge felt that the dominant land would only have extended to the immediate curtilage of Ivy House (including its septic tank) and land from which surface water in the immediate vicinity of the pipe might drain. The whole of the development site would not have benefitted from the easement.
This aspect of the case is therefore a reminder that it is not possible to extend the use of an easement for the benefit of land that is not part of the original dominant land.
- Finally, the judge considered whether, if he were wrong about the extent of the dominant land, B could have used a prescriptive drainage easement for the benefit of the developed site. In doing so, he provided a reminder for developers of the key questions to consider in this area.
In McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, the Court of Appeal ruled that an implied or prescriptive easement cannot continue to be used where the dominant land has changed use or has been developed if the development of the dominant land represent a radical change in its character or a change in its identity and the use of the dominant land, as redeveloped, results in a substantial increase or alteration in the burden on the servient land.
In this case, the judge felt that changing the site from one modest dwelling to nine new dwellings was a radical change in the character of the dominant land. However, the flow of surface water and treated foul water in accordance with an approved scheme permitted by the Environment Agency would not have amounted to a substantial increase in the burden on the servient land. B could therefore have used the easement for the benefit of the developed site.
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Published Article
Kick-starting the UK hydrogen economy
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Legal Update
Is new nuclear needed?
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
Legal Update
Solar panel projects for higher education institutions
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
What are freeports and what benefits could they offer?
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Opinion
Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Legal Update
Improving the performance of the NSIP planning process and supporting local authorities
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise CTS Group on latest geotechnical consultancy leader acquisition
Browne Jacobson’s private equity (PE) dealmakers have advised Palatine Private Equity backed CTS Group (Construction Testing Solutions Limited) on its latest acquisition of Concept Engineering Consultants Limited, a leader in geotechnical, structural and geo-environmental services for an undisclosed amount.
Published Article
Rolls Royce SMR ambitions will bring Hinkley like benefits to regions
Rolls-Royce has shortlisted six locations for its first factory for small nuclear power stations. We look at the impact on regions & local businesses
Published Article
RAAC planks and its impact on local authorities
Recent reports of flat roofs constructed using RAAC planks collapsing without warning prompted the SCOSS alert.
Guide
How will the Building Safety Act 2022 impact buildings completed before the Act comes into force?
Guide
How will the Building Safety Act 2022 impact on the design and construction of buildings commenced after the Act comes into force?
Guide
How will the Building Safety Act 2022 impact on the ownership and occupation of higher-risk buildings?
Published Article
The Building Safety Act 2022: Navigating building liability orders
Opinion
Compliance - small businesses and new regulation
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has released a report setting out the impact of new and changing regulations arising from the pandemic on small businesses across the UK.
Legal Update
Construction: Gold Standard Framework – seven months on
We have created a summary of the recommendations and consistent themes which we are now starting to see becoming more embedded in public sector procurement practices.
Published Article
Sustainability in construction
The climate emergency has reached a point where real and substantial damage is being caused to both the planet and society. There has been a shift from planning and theorising the most effective solutions, to a phase where practical, efficient, and sustainable solutions are required at speed.
Opinion
Responding to Grenfell – Slow progress is better than none
As the Grenfell Inquiry continues, how have the Phase 1 recommendations changed the fire safety and building safety landscape?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Charterpoint on sale of 73-bed care home site
Browne Jacobson has successfully advised Nottingham based developer Charterpoint on the sale of a 1.2 acre care home development site in Thurnby (Leicestershire) to care home operator Cinnamon.
Opinion
Building Safety Bill receives Royal Assent
The new regime introduced by the Act will take shape over the next 18 months, but those who design, build or manage high rise buildings are being urged to get ready for the changes to be introduced through the act.
Opinion
Update: building safety repairs pledge signed by over 35 major housing developers
On 14 February 2022, Secretary of State of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove, announced proposals designed to pressure building developers and materials manufacturers to fund the remediation of unsafe properties.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson broadens its construction offering with appointment of nuclear and renewable energy specialist
Browne Jacobson has broadened its national construction and engineering offering with the appointment of construction partner Zoe Stollard into its Birmingham office.
Opinion
HSE Campaign Targets Construction Industry in Birmingham
The HSE has announced a campaign targeting health and safety in the construction industry in Birmingham. The Campaign is in response to a significant increase in development across the city, partly as a result of preparations for the 2022 Commonwealth Games.
Opinion
Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
On-Demand
Levelling up white paper strategic briefing
The levelling up white paper sets out a set of 12 priority ‘missions’ to be pursued by national and local government in the years to come. With measures covering regeneration, communities, connectivity, education, R&D, employment, and health.
Guide
2022: Horizon scanning in construction
Published Article
Construction needs to do more to reduce carbon emissions
More needs to be made of these procurement routes, with clients honouring the original concept rather than watering down concepts.
Legal Update
Have You Gotta Have Faith? The effect of good faith and mutual co-operation provisions in construction contracts
In this article we explore the concept of good faith in the context of construction contracts for public bodies, and what the recent decision in Van Oord Ltd v Dragados Ltd does for this area of law.
Legal Update
Using building contracts to go ‘green’ in health buildings
With the COP26 summit which was held in Glasgow in November 2021 and the increasing global awareness of environmental concerns, the world of construction cannot escape the shift to operating in a more sustainable manner.
Press Release
Firm expands construction practice into Manchester with key legal appointment
Browne Jacobson has appointed Ragene Raithatha, a specialist in both contentious and non-contentious matters, as a Legal Director in its new Manchester construction practice.
Published Article
The future of building
Construction is a major contributor to carbon emissions – buildings consume 36% of energy produced globally and are responsible for 39% of carbon emissions.
Legal Update
The Building Safety Bill – what does it mean for you?
Earlier this month the Government published the Building Safety Bill as part of its continuing efforts to respond to the Grenfell disaster and recommendations made following the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety led by Dame Judith Hackitt.
Published Article
Procurement reform: what’s in it for construction?
The consultation Green Paper: Transforming public procurement was issued by the Cabinet Office in December 2020. Whilst we await the Bill, the Green Paper sets a very strong direction of travel and there is much to consider for the construction sector.
Legal Update
Early contractor involvement is growing in popularity with local authorities, but which is the best route, JCT or NEC?
Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) and New Engineering Contract (NEC) - which drafting works best, and where are the traps for the unwary?
Training
Regeneration review - where are we now?
Catch up on our regeneration video, where we look at four keys areas of regeneration; public law, planning, construction and real estate.