We have observed a trend of more projects being carried out either wholly or using some element of off-site fabrication of modular buildings or other modern methods of construction. Some commentators have suggested they expect the market for modular buildings to grow in excess of 6% year on year.
It is easy to see why it is proving popular and this approach and utilising modern techniques and processes can enhance efficiency, quality and sustainability.
We anticipate this trend will continue into and throughout 2024 for a number of reasons:
- The comparative speed with which modular buildings are normally carried could assist in reducing both parties’ exposure to the risk of high levels of inflation.
- Modular buildings will likely provide the most cost effective and efficient long-term solution to the RAAC crisis.
- The use of modular buildings is considered a more sustainable approach to building.
- Modular residential buildings are seen by many as the only realistic way to resolve the housing crisis and it may be particularly relevant in an election year or a year in which a new government comes into power.
Modular building contractors: Employer considerations
In terms of the effect this could have from a legal perspective, a significant increase in popularity for modular buildings could see demand outpacing supply and lead to stock issues and more projects falling into delay.
As modular building companies appear more susceptible to cash flow issues and external economic forces, a potentially volatile economic climate may see more modular building companies cease trading.
It is therefore as important as ever for employers to ensure that they are adequately protected in the event that their modular building contractor ceases trading after it has paid for pre-fabricated buildings that are stored off site.
Employers will want to ensure vesting certificates and, if appropriate and available, bonds are in place to offer protection in the event of contractor insolvency.
One of the downsides of modular construction is that if a defect is caused during the construction process in the factory, it is likely that the same defect could be repeated on every single property produced by that factory using the same methods.
Although the JCT is releasing a new suite of contracts it is not anticipated that this will include a new specific contract for modular buildings or any specific clauses in a nod to modern methods of construction.
We understand the JCT feel that their current suite of contracts already facilitates modern methods of construction and it is therefore unlikely the new suite will depart too greatly with concessions for modern methods of construction.
We also anticipate that the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) will continue to take steps to standardise modular buildings and other modern methods of construction through their ongoing 'Modern Methods of Construction Standardisation Research and Kit of Parts' project to develop an open-source kit of parts that will encourage the uptake of Modern Methods of Construction.
We understand the DLUHC feels standardisation is necessary to speed up research and integrate modern methods of construction deeper into the industry, believing that a collective move towards standardisation and learning collectively will speed up research, speed up construction programmes and allow us to harness the potential of modern methods of construction quicker.
This view is not held by everyone however, with at least one major firm expressing extreme concern that the move towards standardisation will greatly reduce the potential for innovation.
Contents
Contact
Tim Claremont
Partner
tim.claremont@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)20 7871 8507
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
JCT 2024: What’s new? An overview of the changes
Press Release
Spring Budget 2024: Browne Jacobson reaction
Legal Update
Restrictive covenants – look before you leap!
Legal Update
2024: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
The Building Safety Act: What to expect in 2024
Legal Update
The impact of insolvencies on construction in 2024
Legal Update
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update
ESG and the path to net zero: Construction industry considerations
Legal Update
Modern methods of construction and modular buildings
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
A new JCT suite in 2024
Legal Update
COP28 – key outcomes agreed and what they mean for you
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG): Are we ready for it?
Legal Update
The Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
Legal Update
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Legal Update
New building control regime for higher-risk buildings
Published Article
Al in construction: Do your contracts mitigate the risks?
Legal Update
How to mitigate risk in disputes arising from AI use in construction projects
Legal Update
What does ‘RAAC’ mean for university campuses?
Legal Update
Contractors' liability and contract works exclusion
Legal Update
Recklessness not ‘accidental’ when it comes to trespass
Legal Update
Underlying contracts remain key in arguments over scope of co-insurance
Legal Update
Insurance considerations following use of RAAC concrete
Legal Update
Covering the costs of RAAC – new guidance published
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
Building Safety Act 2022: New duty holder and competency regime from 1 October 2023
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Published Article - RAAC
Action needed: How RAAC became a critical issue
Legal Update - RAAC
Insurance considerations of RAAC failures - air bubbles belong in chocolate, not concrete!
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Legal Update
The UK’s energy strategy: Is new nuclear needed?
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
Published Article
The history and future of nuclear energy
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
On-Demand
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Press Release
Former Mace Group Legal Director joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director of its Construction & Real Estate sector
Browne Jacobson has appointed Amy Chapman, the former Group Legal Director of global built environment experts Mace Group, as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Construction & Real Estate sector strategy board.