ESG encompasses most of the biggest issues at the forefront of society, from navigating the path to Net Zero to ensuring social responsibility through a supply chain.
The construction sector keenly focuses on the environment since c. 40% of total greenhouse gas emissions flow from the industry. Looking forward to 2024 and beyond, the construction industry may have to pivot to a more holistic approach and provide strategies for social and governance issues alike.
Sustainable construction: Enviornmental issues
Developing sustainable construction practices and strategies to reach Net Zero have been increasingly in the spotlight over the last few years - both in terms of the carbon cost of construction and over the lifecycle of developments. However, legal obligations and specific drafting around reducing carbon emissions (what can be called “climate clauses”) have still not been adopted on mass in contracts by the industry. In the coming years we expect to see a legal shift to create a more robust contractual environment to hold parties operating in the sector to account for their climate commitments on projects as we move ever closer to the mandated Net-Zero deadlines of the Government.
Climate clauses can come in a variety of forms (and there are no doubt novel ones still to come, perhaps from the Chancery Lane Project). Examples include having specific carbon KPIs whereby contractors are rewarded for achieving or exceeding carbon targets; having liquidated damages levied against Contractors for failing to meet carbon targets; or having achievement of carbon targets as a key part of the Employer’s Requirements/Scope and therefore a condition of practical completion.
Such clauses represent a shift in the contractual agreement towards a more legally sustainable construction project. However, contractors and employers alike have either found these difficult to work with in practice or are not yet sufficiently motivated to include them as standard. The nature of a successful contract enables risk to be shared and for each party to understand their obligations – climate clauses can present a problem on both of those fronts.
For example, specific legal drafting that creates reporting obligations in terms of carbon emissions (or otherwise relies on such reporting – as do the examples above) can outpace the standard of reporting and the access to reliable data that the industry has.
Reliably mapping the carbon impact across a construction project is a relatively novel concept in the market and access to the resources and technology to do this best is costly. Accordingly, some consider trying to impose climate related reporting obligations on construction businesses is, at present, a near pointless endeavour.
As we move through 2024 and beyond, the quality of data reporting across the industry is set to improve and which may pave the way for a rise in climate related clauses in construction contracts.
The construction industry, for good reason, relies commonly upon various standard form contracts as the base of their negotiations but these largely pre-date the increasing demand for climate clauses. There is a hope that when the new suite of JCT contracts are introduced next year (see below for more details), they provide either the basis of a standardised approach to dealing with climate change and environmental issues in construction contracts or new supplemental provisions giving parties options they are prompted to consider.
Sustainable construction: Social issues
Social issues cannot escape the construction sector – while the ‘E’ from ESG occupies most of the spotlight, social issues are ever present but there is generally more progress in contracts on this front. Employers and their lawyers (particularly in the public sector) are more regularly adding drafting into contracts aimed at removing modern slavery in supply chains (an approach also taken in the EU), obliging contractors to utilise SMEs where possible, to make appropriate use of apprentices, to pay suppliers more quickly and setting minimum payment expectations for supplier staff. Such obligations by their nature drive the governance of the contractor and their supply chain to see they are complied with. As with environmental issues, there will be a continued industry focus in 2024 and beyond.
Contact
Tim Claremont
Partner
tim.claremont@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)20 7871 8507
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
JCT 2024: What’s new? An overview of the changes
Press Release
Spring Budget 2024: Browne Jacobson reaction
Legal Update
Restrictive covenants – look before you leap!
Legal Update
2024: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
The Building Safety Act: What to expect in 2024
Legal Update
The impact of insolvencies on construction in 2024
Legal Update
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update
ESG and the path to net zero: Construction industry considerations
Legal Update
Modern methods of construction and modular buildings
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
A new JCT suite in 2024
Legal Update
COP28 – key outcomes agreed and what they mean for you
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG): Are we ready for it?
Legal Update
The Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
Legal Update
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Legal Update
New building control regime for higher-risk buildings
Published Article
Al in construction: Do your contracts mitigate the risks?
Legal Update
How to mitigate risk in disputes arising from AI use in construction projects
Legal Update
What does ‘RAAC’ mean for university campuses?
Legal Update
Contractors' liability and contract works exclusion
Legal Update
Recklessness not ‘accidental’ when it comes to trespass
Legal Update
Underlying contracts remain key in arguments over scope of co-insurance
Legal Update
Insurance considerations following use of RAAC concrete
Legal Update
Covering the costs of RAAC – new guidance published
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
Building Safety Act 2022: New duty holder and competency regime from 1 October 2023
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Published Article - RAAC
Action needed: How RAAC became a critical issue
Legal Update - RAAC
Insurance considerations of RAAC failures - air bubbles belong in chocolate, not concrete!
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Legal Update
The UK’s energy strategy: Is new nuclear needed?
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
Published Article
The history and future of nuclear energy
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
On-Demand
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Press Release
Former Mace Group Legal Director joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director of its Construction & Real Estate sector
Browne Jacobson has appointed Amy Chapman, the former Group Legal Director of global built environment experts Mace Group, as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Construction & Real Estate sector strategy board.