Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Logistics company, Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Manchester Magistrates Court heard that in 2018, work at the Widnes site was earmarked for the storage of empty containers. The ground had become damaged by heavy lift loaders used to move containers, so it was decided to scrape away the top layer to reach an older surface below. The remnants of old buildings containing asbestos were present in that surface material. It is reported that several workers complained about the dust created by these processes and what it may contain.
An investigation by the HSE found that no risk assessments or asbestos surveys had been carried prior to the commencement of the work. A survey was not carried out until many months later which did find the presence of ACM. The company then failed to report the incident under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 within the 10-day timeframe required.
The company pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 and Regulation 11(1) of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. They were fined £133,000 and ordered to pay costs of £9,260.
Asbestos was a commonly used material for many years and therefore it is fundamental prior to any building/construction work, for employers to carry out an asbestos survey; the assumption being that asbestos is present unless proven otherwise. This is the step that should have been taken in this case following a risk assessment, bearing in mind the history and size of site and, subsequently the concerns raised by the workers; whose legitimate concerns at that stage may have been too late.
There is a duty amongst all employers to manage asbestos in all areas of their work and if in doubt, get a survey. This case will act as a reminder to employers in all sectors to undertake due diligence and ensure they are complying with the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Compliance obligations under the EU Batteries Regulation
Legal Update
Essential updates to the RICS service charges in commercial property
Legal Update
Supply chain optimisation: How retailers are saving millions through supplier rationalisation
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Critical incident - Reflection
Legal Update
The National Food Crime Unit: Will new powers make a difference to tackling food fraud?
Legal Update
Update on the Deposit Returns Scheme and the Deposit Management Organisation
Legal Update
Soft Drinks Industry Levy consultation
Legal Update
The EU Deforestation Regulation: Implications and actions for the fashion industry
On-Demand
Nuclear PSG webinar: Conflict avoidance on major projects
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
URS v BDW: Comment and practical implications for the building industry
Legal Update
Charity law update, June 2025
Guide - Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehicles in the UK: Where are we now?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to explore skills challenges in built environment at UKREiiF event
Legal Update
Data centres in Ireland: The Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU) Proposed Decision
Legal Update
Martyn’s Law receives Royal Assent: What does it mean for retailers?
Legal Update
Changes to market authorisation for regulated products
Legal Update
The UK's new Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) effective from October 2027
Legal Update
UK Government announces collaborative development of new national food strategy
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Regulatory and employment
Press Release
Browne Jacobson returns to UKREiiF 2025
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Critical incident response and criminal investigations
Opinion
Court of Appeal confirms wide scope of protection under blacklisting regulations
Opinion
HSE continues its 'Asbestos: Your Duty' campaign with local authorities
Press Release
Chancellor’s economic growth speech: Comments from Browne Jacobson lawyers
Legal Update - Autonomous vehicles
The future of transportation: The UK's approach to automated vehicles
Legal Update
Dry January 2025: Legal considerations for manufacturers, hospitality and retailers
Legal Update
Building Liability Orders: What’s next?
Legal Update
Insolvencies and claims under Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010
Legal Update
The rapid growth of AI in construction
Legal Update
Key legal considerations for future sustainable developments
Legal Update
2025: Horizon scanning in construction
Guide
Maximising commercial income for the NHS
Legal Update - DMCC Act
UK consumer law: What is changing and how might it affect retailers?
Legal Update - Autonomous vehicles
When roads diverge regulating autonomous vehicles: EU v UK approaches
Legal Update - Food and drink regulatory update
Food for Thought: Food and drink regulatory update: Winter 2024
Legal Update
How the new junk food regulations will reshape Christmas advertising
Legal Update
DEFRA provides clarity around the GB wide 'Not for EU' labelling obligations
Legal Update
How the Regulatory Innovation Office could stir up the food and drink sector
Legal Update
Martyn’s Law: Paving the way for enhanced security measures across UK venues and events
