Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Logistics company, Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Manchester Magistrates Court heard that in 2018, work at the Widnes site was earmarked for the storage of empty containers. The ground had become damaged by heavy lift loaders used to move containers, so it was decided to scrape away the top layer to reach an older surface below. The remnants of old buildings containing asbestos were present in that surface material. It is reported that several workers complained about the dust created by these processes and what it may contain.
An investigation by the HSE found that no risk assessments or asbestos surveys had been carried prior to the commencement of the work. A survey was not carried out until many months later which did find the presence of ACM. The company then failed to report the incident under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 within the 10-day timeframe required.
The company pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 and Regulation 11(1) of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. They were fined £133,000 and ordered to pay costs of £9,260.
Asbestos was a commonly used material for many years and therefore it is fundamental prior to any building/construction work, for employers to carry out an asbestos survey; the assumption being that asbestos is present unless proven otherwise. This is the step that should have been taken in this case following a risk assessment, bearing in mind the history and size of site and, subsequently the concerns raised by the workers; whose legitimate concerns at that stage may have been too late.
There is a duty amongst all employers to manage asbestos in all areas of their work and if in doubt, get a survey. This case will act as a reminder to employers in all sectors to undertake due diligence and ensure they are complying with the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
JCT 2024: What’s new? An overview of the changes
Legal Update
AI deep fake fraud exposed - five key lessons and how we need to respond
Legal Update
Landmark judgment in OCS Group UK Limited v Community Health Partnerships Limited
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: focus on the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
Legal Update
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Opinion
Regulator warning on future dangers of asbestos
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update
UK falls to lowest position for corruption – so what’s going wrong?
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Supply chain issues
Legal Update
2024: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
The Building Safety Act: What to expect in 2024
Legal Update
The impact of insolvencies on construction in 2024
Legal Update
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update
ESG and the path to net zero: Construction industry considerations
Legal Update
Modern methods of construction and modular buildings
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
A new JCT suite in 2024
Legal Update
COP28 – key outcomes agreed and what they mean for you
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
Legal Update
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Legal Update - Food and drink regulatory update
Food for Thought: Food and drink regulatory update - Autumn 2023
Legal Update
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – what does it mean for my company?
Legal Update
New building control regime for higher-risk buildings
Published Article
Al in construction: Do your contracts mitigate the risks?
Legal Update
King’s Speech gives the green light for autonomous vehicles
Legal Update
How to mitigate risk in disputes arising from AI use in construction projects
Legal Update
The Supreme Court considers limitation in environmental nuisance claims
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
Building Safety Act 2022: New duty holder and competency regime from 1 October 2023
Legal Update
Building Safety Act 2022: New building control regime from 1 October 2023
Opinion
What’s lurking in your garden? The UK’s most dangerous and invasive plants
Opinion
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
Legal Update
The future of autonomous technology - August 2023
Legal Update
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Published Article
Kick-starting the UK hydrogen economy
Legal Update
Browne Jacobson grows Cardiff team with two new appointments
Guide
How to manage retail sector supply contracts and avoid disputes
