0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Brexit frustration

20 February 2019

Are you frustrated by Brexit? If so, that’s more than can be said of the European Medicines Agency’s £13m a year lease at Canary Wharf.

 

Under the doctrine of frustration, a contract can be discharged if something happens after the contract has been formed which makes it impossible to fulfil the contract. Although the doctrine can in theory apply to leases, there are no reported cases where it has been so applied.

 

The European Medicines Agency is tied into its lease until 2039 with no break rights. As it is moving to Amsterdam as a result of Brexit, it argued that Brexit had caused its lease to be frustrated (which would allow it to walk away from its lease). To the relief of landlords, investors and lenders (and everyone else relying on the certainty of commercial contracts), the High Court has today ruled that the lease continues despite Brexit.

 

The message for tenants here is clear. If you want a right to terminate your lease early (whether as a result of Brexit or for any other reason), include such a right in your lease. Otherwise, unless you can assign or sublet the property (both of which options are open to the European Medicines Agency), you could be stuck paying rent on a property you do not use.

Brexit and beyond: navigating the challenges ahead

Our Brexit hub provides useful information on the key areas that are likely to be affected by Brexit, the priority issues for any business or organisation and practical guidance to help you navigate the challenges ahead.

Visit the Brexit hub >

related opinions

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

Watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

View blog

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up