0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

4 May 2021

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending. Here, the tenant, Virgin Active Health Clubs Ltd, had proposed a Part 26A restructuring plan and the Court was asked to consider competing applications for summary judgment and a stay.

There was a reasonable prospect that the restructuring plan would receive sanction; even if only as a result of the Court’s discretion to override any dissenting class (or classes) of creditor because: (i) creditors would be no worse off; and (ii) at least one class would approve the plan by the requisite majority.

It was plain to see that summary judgment would undermine the restructuring plan since, if successful, the claimant landlord would receive substantially more than other landlords in the same class. As a result, the Court was forced to ask whether a stay would prejudice the legitimate interests of any relevant person and, if so, where the balance of convenience lay?

Ultimately the interests of the wider class of creditors trumped the private interests of the landlord and a short stay under CPR 3.1(2)(f) was imposed, until after the sanction hearing for the restructuring plan, to allow the process under Part 26A to proceed.

This case, whilst not surprising to insolvency professionals given the importance placed on creditors’ interest as a whole, will be disturbing to those landlords who, having adhered to Government guidance, have deliberately held off taking enforcement steps and may now find themselves unable to do so, having their dissent disregarded and having those same debts compromised using this new restructuring regime.

Co-authored by Emma Taylor and Louise Read.

related opinions

Landlords’ claims for summary judgment for ‘Covid’ rent arrears succeed (again)

A landlord’s claim for summary judgment to recover rent and service charge arrears accrued since the start of the pandemic against a non-essential retailer succeeded. Like London buses, a second such case has followed hot on its heels.

View blog

The High Court offers no comfort for beleaguered retailers

Whilst this decision may not be surprising, it will undoubtedly send a chill down the spine of retailers in a similar position to The Fragrance Shop.

View blog

Service charges – the bad news keeps coming for tenants!

A few months ago, we discussed a case where the Court of Appeal ruled that the wording of a lease precluded the tenant from arguing that certain costs should not have been included in the service charge calculation. A recent high-profile case concerns a broadly similar issue, this time in relation to the proportion of the landlord’s costs payable by a tenant.

View blog

A landlord’s service charge certificate was conclusive as to the sums payable by a tenant under a lease

The Court of Appeal has ruled that the wording of a service charge clause precluded a tenant from challenging the sums claimed by a landlord.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up