Sequana: Supreme clarification on the duty owed to creditors
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
The ‘creditor duty’ modifies the rule in s172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 which otherwise requires directors to act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole. It is not a free-standing duty but, when engaged, it requires directors to manage the company’s affairs in a way which takes into account the interests of the general body of creditors, to give appropriate weight to those interests and seeks not to harm those interests. This decision is important as it recognises the relative importance of a creditor’s economic interest in a company and the fact that that economic interest increases where the company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency.
The test of when the ‘creditor duty’ is engaged has been articulated in many different ways. The process of Sequana through the Courts has effectively filtered out some of those colloquialisms. The majority view of the Supreme Court is that the ‘creditor duty’ will be engaged when the directors know, or ought to know, that the company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, or that an insolvent liquidation or administration is probable. The weight that should then be given to creditors’ interests will depend on the extent of the company’s financial difficulties with those interests achieving paramountcy only if the company becomes irretrievable insolvent.
Progress towards insolvency may not be linear and directors should stay informed of the company’s financial position and the changing emphasis on the interests of creditors in order to react effectively as matters evolve and, in doing so, to protect themselves from personal liability.
For further comment and discussion of the implications of the judgment from our Financial & Professional Risk team, please click here.
You may be interested in...
In Person Event
'Autonomous vehicles: what the future holds' event
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on Blazehill Capital’s second £250m facility which will support the UK business market
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises privacy-first ad tech company Covatic on Series A investment led by Manchester based Praetura Ventures
Press Release
Browne Jacobson announces completion of employee acquisition of Two Twenty
Legal Update
Subsidy control lessons to be learnt from Bulb
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Legal Update
MiCA: The Comprehensive Crypto Regulation Set to revolutionise the EU
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s North-West banking specialists advise ThinCats on £10m facility to arcade bar operator NQ64
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Opinion
Mediation – remote or in person?
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Apiary Capital on its on tenth investment into ‘Outstanding’ professional education provider
Opinion
Confirmation of ACAS early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Press Release
Browne Jacobson strengthens its Banking practice with two Birmingham appointments
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Press Release
Apiary Capital backed Radiant Financial Group advised by Browne Jacobson on new debt facility to fund growth strategy
Legal Update
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
Opinion
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has approval to take over from the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Legal Update
Embargoed Judgments: A Professional Word of Caution
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Opinion
Litigation in 2023 – Reforms on the horizon
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s banking & finance team describe 2022 as a “game of two halves” after completing over £2 billion worth of transactions
Legal Update
Banking Transaction Updates - January 2023
Press Release
Manchester dealmakers advise Maven Capital Partners on £1m investment in fintech disruptor Nivo Solutions
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Grant Funding and Collaboration Agreements
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Commercial Contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises sustainable waste solution provider Covanta Europe on its new Wellingborough based aggregate processing plant
Legal Update
Sustainable finance - great opportunity but there are risks for businesses that do not engage
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
From associate to partner in an investment lifecycle - Ryan's story
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Browne Jacobson helps the Civil Aviation Authority take off with its modernisation masterplan
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic £48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
National law firm Browne Jacobson has advised long standing retail client, Wilko on the sale and leaseback of its Nottinghamshire distribution centre in Worksop to logistics specialist DHL for £48m.
Legal Update
Five “takeaways” in claims against mortgage brokers following Taylor v Legal & General Partnership Services Ltd [2022] EWHC 2475 (Ch)
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
