Directors and officers: ESG and litigation
Directors and officers (D&Os) now face a dramatically changed liability environment. Shareholder class actions and derivative actions, which were once rare, are increasingly used to hold company executives accountable.
An evolving risk landscape
Commentators had previously warned of a US-style litigation surge against D&Os, and in 2025 we now see clear signs of that trend materialising.
Group shareholder claims under sections 90 and 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) are on the rise, targeting alleged misstatements in financial reports and market disclosures.
Institutional investors and claimant law firms, backed by litigation funders are more willing than ever to pursue claims against corporate executives for perceived governance failures.
Rise in shareholder actions
Notably, 2024 saw the high-profile ESG-related securities class action, whereby investors sued a UK retailer’s directors (Boohoo Group) for failing to disclose labour law abuses in its supply chain.
This and similar actions reflect a broader trend that shareholders are expanding the scope of alleged wrongdoing by D&Os beyond financial misstatements to include climate risk, human rights, and other ESG issues.
While the predicted “litigation explosion” did not occur overnight, the steady rise in these claims confirms that the predicted D&O litigation risk is now a reality.
Minority shareholders are also turning to derivative actions to pursue directors for breach of directors’ duties. Recent cases see activist investors alleging boards failed to prevent corporate misconduct or manage key risks (for example cybersecurity and climate change oversight).
Implications for D&Os
The practical impact on directors and officers is significant. Senior managers face not only personal financial exposure but also intense regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
The costs of defending shareholder and derivative litigation are high, often running into the millions, which can erode D&O insurance limits.
An increasing claims frequency has led to the hardening of the D&O insurance market in recent years, resulting in an increase in premiums, higher retentions, and insurers seeking to tighten policy terms.
For insurers, it will be even more important that they scrutinise corporate governance, claims history, disclosure controls and ESG practices, since weaknesses in these areas can often lead to costly claims.
D&Os should respond by strengthening corporate governance, diligently documenting board decisions and ensuring their D&O cover is sufficient.
The ECCTA 2023 factor
The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 introduces a new wave of corporate crime offences (especially the “failure to prevent fraud” offence) and expands potential liability of misconduct to companies. While primarily targeting companies, these changes indirectly increase the personal risk for D&Os as well.
A corporate fraud or money-laundering incident can now result in a potential corporate liability claim, which in turn may trigger a potential derivative action or regulatory claim alleging that directors failed to prevent the wrongdoing.
Whilst the ECCTA’s emphasis is on “reasonable prevention procedures”, it is effectively a mandate for boards to further strengthen their corporate governance.
In our article, we consider the ECCTA in more detail.
Looking ahead
The rise in shareholder and derivative actions against UK directors appears set to continue. D&Os should treat this as a call to action. Focussing on proactive risk management and scrupulous attention to disclosure obligations are now more frequently parts of a director’s job description.
For insurers, the challenge is to adapt policy wordings and capacity to a risk environment where large-scale shareholder claims are no longer an anomaly.
Both corporate boards and D&O insurers will need to be prepared to deal with the increased volume of legal actions.
Contents
- Professional and management matters: October 2025
- AI washing: What UK directors and officers need to know
- Ensuring compliance after Mazur: A practical guide for law firms
- Considerations for professionals when using artificial intelligence
- Cyber attacks: Could brokers be in the firing line?
- A reminder to accountants and tax advisers: Know your policy terms
- Update on the Audit Reform and Corporate Governance Bill
Related expertise
You might be interested in...
Guide
Counterfeit automotive parts: Car manufacturer and dealer risks
Legal Update
Directors and officers: ESG and litigation
Legal Update
AI washing: What UK directors and officers need to know
Legal Update
The impact of Martyn’s Law for insurers
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson expands international disputes offering with new Head of Commercial Dispute Resolution in London
Legal Update
Proposed amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Update
Are amendments to be expected for the Arbitration Act 1996?
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Legal Update
Trigger happy when directors’ duties are the target?
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
Opinion
Sequana: Supreme clarification on the duty owed to creditors
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
Opinion
Is it hot in here, or is it just me?
Whilst the weather conditions are predicted to be cooling down this week, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is asking employers and businesses to consider adapting to recurrent warmer weather conditions for the safety and benefit of their staff. It asks employers to ensure that extreme heat becomes a firm part of longer term risk management. Climate change in any event is something all businesses will need to consider as the warmer weather becomes more frequent - extreme heat is something that will impact employers on a day to day basis.
Opinion
Civil remedies trump POCA recovery in landmark decision
The decision in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Limited provides welcome clarification on the interplay between POCA and common law recovery. It seems companies may still be subject to the POCA regime and stripped of a potential windfall which the CPS did not avail themselves of in this case.
Legal Update
The impact of Covid-19 on professionals
With the Government predicting that up to 20% of the workforce could be off at the same time during the pandemic and a period of economic uncertainty expected to follow, we are likely to see a significant rise in claims against professionals stemming indirectly from the Covid-19 outbreak.
Legal Update
Director duties and Covid-19
Boards across the country are working tirelessly to respond to an ever-evolving situation as quickly as they can - with one eye on trying to protect the business, employees and wider stakeholders and the other on ensuring that they are always acting in the best interests of their shareholders.
Legal Update
New insolvency laws during the COVID-19 crisis
On Saturday, 28 March 2020, Business Secretary, Alok Sharma MP, announced changes to the insolvency regime as part of the governments overriding objective.
Legal Update
Companies to receive a three month extension period to file accounts during COVID-19
Legal Update
IR35: Budget confirms changes coming 6 April 2020
Opinion
SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement
On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.
Legal Update
The disappearance of LIBOR
Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.
Legal Update
Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP
The Court of Appeal has set out six steps to be considered when applying the ‘SAAMCo’ scope of duty principle in auditors’ negligence cases.