New insolvency laws during the COVID-19 crisis
On Saturday, 28 March 2020, Business Secretary, Alok Sharma MP, announced changes to the insolvency regime as part of the governments overriding objective.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication
On Saturday, 28 March 2020, Business Secretary, Alok Sharma MP, announced changes to the insolvency regime as part of the governments overriding objective “to help UK companies which need to undergo a financial rescue or restructuring process to keep trading” by giving “those firms extra time and space to weather the storm and be ready when the crisis ends whilst ensuring that creditors get the best return possible in the circumstances.”
The changes to the insolvency regime announced by Mr Sharma include:
- a moratorium for companies giving them breathing space from creditors enforcing their debts for a period of time whilst they seek a rescue or restructure;
- protection of their supplies to enable them to continue trading during the moratorium;
- a new restructuring plan, binding creditors to that plan;
- key safeguards for creditors and suppliers to ensure they are paid while a solution is sought; and
- a temporary suspension of wrongful trading provisions with retrospective effect from 1 March 2020 to give company directors greater confidence to use their best endeavours to continue to trade during this pandemic emergency without the threat of personal liability should the company ultimately fall into insolvency.
Legislation in relation to these changes is due to be brought forward at the “earliest opportunity”.
A Government consultation in August 2018 envisaged a new moratorium to help business rescue; giving financially distressed companies which are ultimately viable a period of time when creditors (including secured creditors) could not take action against the company allowing it to make preparations to restructure or seek new investment. Whether or not the current changes will be modelled on the outcome of that consultation remains to be seen but it would appear to be a good starting point. However, given the changes that have been made to the wrongful trading provisions it is equally possible that more wide-reaching changes could be made to prevent any creditor action connected to the current emergency pandemic.
Supply to Businesses
Over the coming days, the government will no doubt provide further details of the proposed new rules. However, rather than there being completely new rules, it seems likely that the government will simply extend the existing essential supplies regime under sections 233 and 233A of the Insolvency Act 1986 which, together with the changes to the wrongful trading provisions, was a proposal made by the City of London Law Society.
The existing insolvency provisions prevent suppliers of utilities (e.g. gas, water, electricity) and other goods and services where the supply is for the purpose of enabling or facilitating anything to be done by electronic means (e.g. website hosting, advice/assistance in connection with IT, data storage and processing, computer hardware and software, point of sales terminals) from terminating or threatening to terminate supply under the supply contract unless arrears are paid.
Directors have been concerned, perhaps unnecessarily, about their potential personal liability for wrongful trading during the current COVID-19 crisis.
Under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986, directors can potentially become personally liable to make a contribution to the company’s assets if, before the commencement of the winding up of a company or it entering administration, the director knew or ought to have concluded that there was no reasonable prospect that the company would avoid insolvent liquidation or insolvent administration. Section 214 is already flexible in nature as the remedies are largely discretionary and there are exemptions for directors who take every step with a view to minimising the potential loss to creditors (on the basis that, at that point, the creditors’ interests are paramount).
Given the significant impact on the turnover of businesses during the COVID-19 crisis and the fact that those businesses may be taking on further debts to survive, it is understandable that directors may be concerned about whether or not to continue and if they will be personally liable for doing so. The government has sought to address these concerns by temporarily suspending the wrongful trading provisions. However, rather than seeking to legislate on an urgent basis (with the inevitable issues that arise from that) it may have been better for the government to declare that directors, provided they are acting reasonably and responsibly in light of the extreme pressures put on them by COVID-19, already have protection under the existing wrongful trading provisions.
The current messaging could erroneously lead directors to believe that they can keep their businesses afloat without proper regard to their continuing duties as directors. Of course, that is not the case and Mr Sharma was keen to emphasise that “all of the other checks and balances that help to ensure that directors fulfil their duties properly will remain in force”. These will include actions against delinquent directors under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 for misfeasance or breach of duty, potential disqualification and actions under section 213 for fraudulent trading.
Even though the government is temporarily suspending the wrongful trading provisions, directors should still be fully aware of their continuing duties and the consequences of not complying with them. In addition, given that directors may in the current crisis have a greater desire to pay connected creditors or otherwise prefer one creditor over another, they should consider whether such transactions are likely to be deemed a ‘preference’ or ‘transaction at an undervalue’ which could be susceptible to challenge at a later date.
Co-authored by John Adams and Emma Taylor.
You may be interested in...
Browne Jacobson advises Care Fertility Group on acquisition of CRGW
Browne Jacobson partner Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join Browne Jacobson
Browne Jacobson advise on Rcapital’s strategic exit from facilities and property services specialist Triosgroup
Law firm advises on MBO of insolvency and restructuring firm Bridgewood backed by DSW Capital
Insolvency practitioners and trustee immunity
'Autonomous vehicles: what the future holds' on-demand
Mediation – remote or in person?
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
Automotive webinar - Grant Funding and Collaboration Agreements
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.
Automotive webinar - Commercial Contracts
Browne Jacobson advises sustainable waste solution provider Covanta Europe on its new Wellingborough based aggregate processing plant
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
From associate to partner in an investment lifecycle - Ryan's story
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Browne Jacobson helps the Civil Aviation Authority take off with its modernisation masterplan
Trigger happy when directors’ duties are the target?
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Sequana: Supreme clarification on the duty owed to creditors
The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the BTI v Sequana appeal and reviewed the existence, content and engagement of the so-called ‘creditor duty’; being the point at which the interest of creditors is said to intrude upon the decision-making of directors of companies in financial distress.
IR35 rules to be scrapped from April 2023
The problematic transition to electric vehicles - what is the impact on manufacturing
It was reported in May 2022 that the BMW-owned manufacturer had been forced to put a temporary stop on the production of all manual transmission vehicles due to the global semi-conductor shortage and the war in Ukraine. Mini stated that the move was made in order to "ensure production stability".
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson strengthens its UK&I commercial practice with hire of new retail & consumer specialist partner
Browne Jacobson has bolstered its commercial practice in the UK with the appointment of commercial contracts and international trade specialist, Emma Roake, into its City-based London team.
Browne Jacobson’s Private Equity specialists advise Palatine on key CTS exit
Browne Jacobson’s national private equity (PE) lawyers have advised leading mid-market PE investment firm, Palatine Private Equity (Palatine) on its exit from CTS Group, the fast-growing specialist in testing, inspection and geoengineering consulting services to the construction and infrastructure sectors.
Browne Jacobson’s specialist corporate finance lawyers advise LDC on sale of global IT services provider
Browne Jacobson’s corporate finance lawyers have advised leading mid-market private equity firm, LDC and management on the sale of specialist managed IT services provider, Littlefish to Bowmark Capital.
Digital Markets Act and Data Platforms - FRANDs for life?
The Digital Markets Act (the “DMA”) joins the dots between competition law and data protection law and actively targets data-driven platforms. It is also a comprehensive regulation to take note of, with familiar GDPR-style fines tied to turnover.
Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?
Browne Jacobson advise CTS Group on acquisition of In Situ testing specialists
Browne Jacobson’s private equity (PE) dealmakers have advised Palatine Private Equity backed CTS Group (Construction Testing Solutions Limited) on its acquisition of In Situ Site Investigation, a market leader in Cone Penetration Testing and Pressuremeter techniques and ground investigation services.
Is it hot in here, or is it just me?
Whilst the weather conditions are predicted to be cooling down this week, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is asking employers and businesses to consider adapting to recurrent warmer weather conditions for the safety and benefit of their staff. It asks employers to ensure that extreme heat becomes a firm part of longer term risk management. Climate change in any event is something all businesses will need to consider as the warmer weather becomes more frequent - extreme heat is something that will impact employers on a day to day basis.
Sole director decisions: Another perspective
Merger and Acquisition trends in the specialist lending market
Rolls Royce SMR ambitions will bring Hinkley like benefits to regions
Rolls-Royce has shortlisted six locations for its first factory for small nuclear power stations. We look at the impact on regions & local businesses
Banking Transaction Update July 2022 - North West transactions
There are clearly challenging macro-economic factors at play but at Browne Jacobson we continue to see good levels of transactional activity with certain sectors being particularly buoyant: healthcare, financial services, energy & infrastructure and tech.
Covid Rent Arrears: Cinema operators’ appeals dismissed
The Court of Appeal has dismissed two cases regarding rent arrears accrued during the Covid lockdowns. The cases are London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Ltd and Bank of New York Mellon (International) Ltd v Cine-UK Ltd.
Browne Jacobson advise on the disposal of international chemical manufacturer
Browne Jacobson’s corporate lawyers have successfully advised the shareholders of specialist chemical manufacturer, Amity International on its acquisition by Belimed AG, a subsidiary of Metall Zug AG.
Proceed with caution – covenants in franchise agreements
In the recent case of Dwyer (UK Franchising) Limited v Fredbar Limited and ano’r  EWCA Civ 889, the Court of Appeal considered the reasonableness of restrictive covenants in a franchise agreement.
Browne Jacobson’s North West dealmakers advise on shipping and logistics business acquisition of Lancashire based World Options
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester based corporate lawyers have advised tech enabled shipping and logistics service provider, World Options on its majority buyout by Italian headquartered MBE Worldwide (“MBE”) for an undisclosed sum.
Browne Jacobson advises AIM listed green hydrogen tech business on global electrolyser licence deal
Browne Jacobson’s specialist cleantech lawyers have advised AIM market listed Clean Power Hydrogen Group Limited (CPH2) on its global licence agreement with GHFG Ltd.
Court of Appeal overturns “fire and re-hire” injunction
The Court of Appeal overturned the “fire and re-hire” injunction, finding that there was nothing in the express contractual provisions preventing Tesco from giving the notice to terminate employment in the usual way.