The changes reforming Companies House implemented by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) were introduced in March 2024. The new statutory objectives of the Registrars were designed to ensure that there is compliance in delivering documents, and accuracy of information, which would lead to greater confidence in the system which has come in for much criticism in the past.
Of interest to fraud practitioners however are the enhanced duties to ensure that records did not create a false or misleading impression to the public and importantly that the Registrars prevent companies and others from carrying out unlawful activities or facilitating others to carry out unlawful activities. New powers to proactively disclose information to law enforcement (and other government agencies such as the Insolvency Service) under s 102 of ECCTA balanced by the usual data protection legislation and exemptions from civil liability for doing so, whilst co-ordinating with HMRC is a demonstration of the loosening of the shackles when tackling serial offenders (such as phoenix companies). Its ability to impose civil penalties up to £10,000 from 2 May 2024 for breaches of the Companies Act 2006 without having to seek Court approval, is further evidence of its streamlines processes which reduce delay, bureaucratic administration and cost from the process.
By contrast, and in some ways to avoid further victimisation by people exploiting public records, protections are now afforded to companies or individuals by a special mechanism to supress information from public view. All of these developments are welcome, but are they effective?
In a recent matter, a company had been set up using a false address linked to a genuine business and unlawfully using the details of a director whose name was already on Companies House. As the sole shareholder and director removal under the old regime would have been by application to the High Court. It is not clear how, when this entity was set up in 2023, it avoided scrutiny, but there it was, an apparent creditworthy vehicle clearly designed to commit fraud – with potential legal liability for the innocent victims of ID theft, now associated with it.
We invited the Registrar to use the powers under ECCTA to clean up the register to avoid potential harm and legal issues, noting that the Registrar has a duty under s 8 of ECCTA to not register companies whose sole intent is dishonesty and deception. Also to ensure the personal reputation of the unlawfully named director was not affected by association, invoking the right to anonymity by removing material under the general discretion under s 85 ECCTA and restricting public access to the Register under s 90 was necessary. Finally the power to strike off the Company was invoked.
Within 6 weeks the Company’s false address had been sequestered to Companies House in Cardiff, the Director/shareholder details removed, and the dissolution of the company started via the Gazette. Within 3 months it was dissolved and the potential for further harm removed.
With Which? indicating that 10,000 people had asked their addresses to be removed and 2432 not consented to Director removals in 2022, it is clear there is a significant number of issues already before ECCTA. The fact that 244,717 incorporations in Q1 of 2024, and over 5.3 million entities on the total register, Companies House faces a massive task in the clean-up and rebuild of its reputation but with the new powers, and on the recent evidence it is clearly moving the right direction.
Key contact
Paul Wainwright
Partner
paul.wainwright@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)121 237 4577
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Is Companies House turning the tide against facilitators of fraud?
Legal Update
Publication of Home Office’s Preliminary Findings and Direction of Travel in relation to the disclosure process
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Opinion
New fraud offence to be introduced in the new Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Legal Update
Facing the threat of cyber security breaches
Universities and colleges are not immune from deception by unscrupulous bad actors. The extent to which educational institutions can manage and control risk not only depends on financial management and internal controls, but also the robustness of security and processes which can be exploited from outside the organisation.
Legal Update
Integrated Care Boards and preventing NHS fraud – what you need to know and how to achieve it
On 7 July this year, NHS England published its statutory guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and with it set out the ICBs’ role and responsibilities and how they should collaborate, interact and carry out their anti-fraud, bribery and corruption functions in concert with NHS England.
Opinion
Civil remedies trump POCA recovery in landmark decision
The decision in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Limited provides welcome clarification on the interplay between POCA and common law recovery. It seems companies may still be subject to the POCA regime and stripped of a potential windfall which the CPS did not avail themselves of in this case.
Opinion
Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021
Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.
Opinion
Chancellor announces levy on companies subject to anti-money laundering regulations
Legal Update
Contingent loss in negligence claims
Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).
Legal Update
Government publishes response to Joint Committee report on the draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill
Last month we reported that the House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee report on the draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill had been published.