The UK Home Office has confirmed in a press release that a new offence for failing to prevent fraud will be introduced in the forthcoming Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. This Bill will make provision on economic crime and corporate transparency, including the registration of overseas entities.
The new offence intends to hold organisations accountable if they profit from fraud committed by their employees. The offence will make it easier to prosecute large organisations if an employee commits fraud for the organisation’s benefit and the organisation did not have reasonable fraud prevention procedures in place. There will be no need to prove that any consent or connivance existed.
The Home Office has published a factsheet that details how the offence will be applied. Here are some of the key elements:
- The offence will apply to all large companies, including not-for-profit organisations such as charities, as well as incorporated public bodies. Large companies are defined in the Companies Act 2006 as those that meet two out of the three following criteria: more than 250 employees, more than £36 million turnover and more than £18 million in total assets.
- Organisations can avoid prosecution if they have reasonable procedures in place to prevent fraud or where there are circumstances where it is reasonable to have no fraud prevention procedures in place (i.e. where the risk is extremely low). The government will also be under a statutory duty to publish guidance setting out reasonable fraud prevention procedures before the offence comes into force.
- Organisations and employees that are based overseas can still be prosecuted if an employee commits fraud under UK law and/or targets UK victims.
- The offence will predominantly capture fraud and false accounting offences that fall under the Fraud Act 2006 and the Theft Act 1968. Money laundering offences will not be included.
- If convicted, an organisation can receive an unlimited fine.
- Small and medium sized enterprises will be exempt from the new offence but will remain accountable under the existing legal framework.
Andrew Penhale, Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS, commented:
“The scale of fraud in the UK – now comprising 41% of all criminal activity – is so significant that extra measures to help prevent it and protect people from falling victim to this crime is welcome.
The new corporate offence of failing to prevent fraud is another important measure to drive better corporate behaviours and will complement existing measures for prosecutors.
Larger corporate enterprises, which fail to put in place reasonable measures to prevent fraud being committed by their employees, may be held criminally liable for that failure.”
If you have any questions about how your business can prepare for the incoming legislation, please do get in touch.
You may be interested in...
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Proposed amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
D&O: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘personal advantage'
Failure to prevent fraud: how can my organisation prepare?
Insurance considerations following use of RAAC concrete
New fraud offence to be introduced in the new Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
Directors and officers update
‘Final judgment’ or ‘final adjudication’ - what’s the difference?
Directors fined for unsafe removal of asbestos
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
Economic crime and cybercrime
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Facing the threat of cyber security breaches
Universities and colleges are not immune from deception by unscrupulous bad actors. The extent to which educational institutions can manage and control risk not only depends on financial management and internal controls, but also the robustness of security and processes which can be exploited from outside the organisation.
Integrated Care Boards and preventing NHS fraud – what you need to know and how to achieve it
On 7 July this year, NHS England published its statutory guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and with it set out the ICBs’ role and responsibilities and how they should collaborate, interact and carry out their anti-fraud, bribery and corruption functions in concert with NHS England.
Draft Bill published to establish a Register of Overseas Entities
The Government has this week published the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill as part of its measures to crack down on foreign criminals using property in this country to launder money. The Bill proposes the establishment of a Register of Overseas Entities to be maintained by Companies House.
Civil remedies trump POCA recovery in landmark decision
The decision in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Limited provides welcome clarification on the interplay between POCA and common law recovery. It seems companies may still be subject to the POCA regime and stripped of a potential windfall which the CPS did not avail themselves of in this case.
Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021
Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.
Chancellor announces levy on companies subject to anti-money laundering regulations
Contingent loss in negligence claims
Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).
Government publishes response to Joint Committee report on the draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill
Last month we reported that the House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee report on the draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill had been published.
SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement
On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.
Browne Jacobson successfully advises NHS Resolution on fraud case
In one of the most significant fraud findings for the NHS, Lesley Elder, 51, was handed a 5-month custodial sentence for contempt of court for dishonestly claiming in excess of £2.3 million in compensation.