Knowledge is power, and this is true when we talk about KEF (Knowledge Exchange Framework). But why is this the case, and why is KEF so important to the higher education sector?
Knowledge is power, and this is true when we talk about KEF (Knowledge Exchange Framework). But why is this the case, and why is KEF so important to the higher education sector?
Like any business, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) require cash to operate. First and foremost, this means meeting the core business goal of providing teaching and education to individuals, together with all the added-value services needed to enhance the ‘student experience’ and consequently rank high on student satisfaction. High student satisfaction equals higher recruitment more cash on tuition fees, students, and a healthy bank balance to support an HEI’s pedagogical offering.
Secondary to this, HEIs are incubators for research and innovation, developing entrepreneurs and world leaders of the future and supporting the social, economic and political fabric of our society. The KEF is one mechanism used to benchmark HEIs’ success in carrying out some of these non-core activities. The KEF is ultimately a set of performance criteria by which HEIs are measured. It relies on the input of quantitative data via the HEB-CI (Higher Education Business and Community Interaction) survey. An example of such data required by HEB-CI might be the number of patents filed or granted, or the amount of income received under technology licenses. HEIs who do this well or perhaps, more importantly, who capture their data well will be rewarded with money via HEIF (Higher Education Innovation Funding). HEIs will then be able to pursue further opportunities to demonstrate their engagement with the wider world.
At the heart of the KEF problem is the fact that HEIs need to have robust data-capture systems in place and ensure that data is inputted correctly for each project. An example of where data capture could be helpful is research and development (R&D) collaborations. These can be overlooked when considering KEF, and HEIs often don’t consistently record data relating to them (e.g. value). Further, R&D typically falls under the research heading and is swallowed up in the REF (Research Excellence Framework), another framework where HEIs are scored on the quality or impact of their research. There is clearly an overlap between the KEF and REF.
By way of an example, an HEI may enter into an R&D agreement with industry to resolve a particular problem in a production line. The industry partner provides some funding but the HEI carries out its part as in-kind contribution. The HEI is comfortable with this because it is able to publish. Many HEIs will mark this work as ‘research’ and not necessarily consider it relevant for KEF. But HEIs fiercely negotiate intellectual property ownership and exploitation clauses in these R&D agreements. Intellectual property rights are inherently industrial rights. There is clearly a KEF element to many of these R&D agreements tabbed as research.
If “Knowledge” can be defined as:
“facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education” or “the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject”, and
“Exchange” can be defined as:
“an act of giving one thing and receiving another”
then, in the above example, the HEI negotiated itself a royalty-bearing licence in return for imparting its knowledge. This surely is squarely within the meaning of ‘knowledge exchange’ and if the HEI is not counting it as such, is the HEI limiting itself? For example, it is not known how often these fiercely negotiated IP clauses are revisited by HEIs for the purposes of asserting their right to receive a royalty. To address this, HEI’s should consider undertaking an audit of their R&D agreements to identify those which have a strong knowledge exchange element and record them as such for the purposes of KEF. It is possible this audit will identify rights which could be asserted, and which may result in further examples of knowledge exchange.
There are many other examples of valuable knowledge exchange activities between HEIs and business, public and third-sector organisations, community bodies and the wider public. All of these have potential value to the KEF.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
In this article we set out the criteria, expectations and support schools should consider if notified they fall within this new category.
The words “Grammar schools” are once again being whispered in government and the question of whether the creation of new grammar schools will finally be implemented as a central focus to DFE policy has re-surfaced.
As a result of a recent Charity Commission legal action, the former trustee of a Welsh charity was ordered to pay over £117,000 to Wrexham charities which support cancer patients.
Academy trusts no longer need to seek consent for contractual indemnities within the ‘normal course of business’. What do trusts need to consider?
