This year, schools are required to assess the grades students would have been likely to have achieved in their GCSE, AS and A level exams. As not all schools are fully open, we have set out guidance on both Freedom of Information, and Subject Access Requests in case you receive either or both types of requests over the next few months.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as at 8 February 2021
This year, schools are required to assess the grades students would have been likely to have achieved in their GCSE, AS and A level exams. To ensure fairness and enable individuals to understand how their proposed grades were calculated and submitted to the examining bodies, there is likely to be an increase in the number of requests made to schools for information. Requests may include general statistics or specific data in relation to a particular student.
As not all schools are fully open, we have set out guidance on both Freedom of Information, and Subject Access Requests in case you receive either or both types of requests over the next few months.
As those who will be graded for GCSE, A or AS Levels will be over the age of competence, you should consider the age you have set within your data protection policies for seeking a student’s consent when processing their personal data.
If the student is over this age, you should ensure you have their consent to process their personal data where a Subject Access Request (for their data) is made by a parent or carer. The individual’s permission should also be obtained where personal data relating to their assessments is being requested by parents or carers outside of the standard information you would usually share about them with parents/carers more generally.
The requests for the personal data of a particular student may include the work the staff member has based their grade on. This may also include homework assignments, assessments, mock exams or other records, as well as details relating to where a teacher has ranked the student within the subject as opposed to their peers.
In 2020 Ofqual made it clear that schools and colleges should not share provisional grades or rank orders in order to protect the integrity of the process. They stated that exam boards would investigate any inappropriate disclosure as potential malpractice. They also published a letter to all students informing them they were not entitled to this information as it is confidential and that they should not ask teachers or the school for it. This may not be sufficient to stop such requests being made and as such school leaders should inform staff what steps they should take if they are approached by students or parents.
Whilst the current situation concerning grading is new and unique, there is provision under the Data Protection Act 2018 on which schools can rely to refuse a request for such personal data at this time. Paragraph 25 of Schedule 2 of the Act provides that if you are asked to disclose personal data consisting of marks or other information you have processed for the purposes of determining the results of an exam or in consequence of determining the results of an exam, before the date on which exam results are announced, you have until the end of five months from the date of the request, or until the end of 40 days from the date on which the results were announced. The ICO has confirmed the application of this provision for these requests.
Accordingly, you can refuse to respond to any request received prior to results day that related to the specific data of an individual before their examination results are issued quoting the exemption mentioned in Paragraph 25 above.
If you receive a Freedom of Information or Subject Access Requests and would like to discuss your options with one of our legal experts please contact us.
Partner
dai.durbridge@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2105
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
In this article we set out the criteria, expectations and support schools should consider if notified they fall within this new category.
