Co-operative Group Food Ltd v A & A Shah Properties Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 941(Ch)
One of the covenants given by a guarantor in a licence to assign was construed as a sub-guarantee and was therefore valid.
Facts
The appellant (G) was the guarantor (following a transfer of engagements) under a lease granted in 2006 and expiring in 2031. The original tenant under the lease was Somerfield Stores Ltd (T).
In 2011, a licence to assign was granted by the landlord (L) and the lease was duly assigned from T to 99p Stores Ltd (A). The form of authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) required on assignment was in a schedule to the licence and a recital in the licence provided that:
“The Schedule forms part of this Licence and shall have effect as if set out in full in the body of this Licence. Any reference to this Licence includes the Schedule.”
Clause 4.1 of the licence provided that:
“The Tenant [T] and the Tenant's Guarantor [G] covenant to observe and perform the obligations set out in the Authorised Guarantee Agreement immediately after completion of the assignment.”
Clause 4.2 of the licence provided that:
“…..the Tenant's Guarantor agrees that its guarantee and other obligations under the Lease shall remain fully effective and:
(a) to the extent that any provision of this Licence varies the terms of the Lease shall apply to the Lease as varied; and
(b) shall extend and apply to the covenants given by and the obligations on the part of the Tenant under this Licence.”
Both T and A went into administration. L therefore sought rent from G.
Issue
Were clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of the licence to assign direct guarantees by G of A’s obligations under the lease (in which case they were void) or guarantees by G of T’s obligations under the AGA (i.e. sub-guarantees or GAGAs) (in which case they were valid)?Decision
- Clause 4.1 was a direct guarantee. Both T and G covenanted to observe the obligations under the AGA and the obligations under the AGA were direct guarantees of A’s obligations under the lease.
- Clause 4.2 was a sub-guarantee. The recital to the licence made it clear that the licence included the AGA. By clause 4.2(b) of the licence, G was therefore agreeing to guarantee T’s obligations under the AGA.
Points to note/consider
- Whilst this case is about interpretation, it is a useful reminder of how the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (the 1995 Act) has been interpreted by the courts. Both parties in this case accepted that the relevant case-law in this area (Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) and K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 904) meant that a direct guarantee by a guarantor of an assignee’s obligations under a lease was void (as falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act), but a guarantee of a former tenant’s liability under an AGA was valid.
- For the sake of completeness, it is also important to remember that the case of EMI Group Ltd v O & H Q1 Ltd [2016] EWHC 529 (Ch) decided that an assignment from a tenant to its guarantor is void (again for falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act).
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
ASA bans “misleading” Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon’s Den Star
Opinion
Choose your words wisely: Balancing inclusivity and employees’ beliefs at work
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
Legal Update
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
Browne Jacobson strengthens Irish Corporate team with appointment of Principal Associate James Byrne
Legal Update
The benefits of good governance in sport
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to lead discussions on the future of real estate and infrastructure at this year’s UKREiiF 2024 event
Press Release
Browne Jacobson acquires business of real estate practitioner Paul Taylor Solicitors
Legal Update
The Baltimore bridge collapse: One of the biggest losses in maritime insurance history?
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Legal Update
Unravelling the challenges and opportunities in UK sports governance
Legal Update
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
Browne Jacobson successful for National Lottery in Court of Appeal
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
Legal Update
Covid BI litigation (Autumn 2023): Insurance coverage disputes update
Legal Update
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Maven Equity Finance on investment in Traverse Associates
Press Release
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join Browne Jacobson
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Guide
How to manage retail sector supply contracts and avoid disputes
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Sodexo Live! on its move to 100% stake in global sports, travel and hospitality provider STH
Legal Update
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to ‘buy now, pay later’ products
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic £48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
Press Release
Suzanne Harlow joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director
Law firm Browne Jacobson is pleased to announce that Suzanne Harlow has been appointed Non-Executive Director of its Retail, Consumer & Logistics sector.
Legal Update
Fashion retailers: Is this the end for free returns?
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Published Article
Luxury brands and sustainability: The challenges and solutions
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).