0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Trecarrell House Ltd v Rouncefield [2020] EWCA Civ 760

1 July 2020

A landlord’s failure to provide its tenant with a gas safety certificate before the tenant took occupation did not permanently bar the landlord from serving a notice terminating the tenancy under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988.

Facts

An assured shorthold tenancy (AST) was granted to the tenant (R) for six months from February 2017. When the AST was granted, the landlord (TH) did not provide R with a copy of the relevant gas safety certificate for the property before she went into occupation as required by regulation 36(6)(b) of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 (the 1998 Regulations). However, in November 2017, TH did provide R with a copy of a certificate dated January 2017.

In May 2018, TH served a notice on R to terminate the AST under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act) and issued possession proceedings. As section 21A of the 1988 Act provides that a landlord cannot serve a section 21 notice at a time when the landlord is in breach of a ‘prescribed requirement’ (and as compliance with regulation 36(6) of the 1998 Regulations is a ‘prescribed requirement’), R claimed that TH was not entitled to serve a section 21 notice.

R also argued that TH’s section 21 notice was invalid on another ground. Regulation 36(3) of the 1998 Regulations requires a landlord to carry out an annual gas safety inspection and regulation 36(6)(a) requires a landlord to give a tenant of copy of a gas safety certificate within 28 days of any such inspection. It was said that there had been a further gas safety check carried out in February 2018 and that no gas safety certificate had been provided in respect of that test. TH contended that a copy of this certificate had been given to R before the section 21 notice was served.

Issue

Did a failure to comply with regulation 36(6) of the 1998 Regulations preclude TH from ever serving a section 21 notice to terminate R’s AST (as the County Court had ruled)?

Decision

A section 21 notice can be served so long as a landlord has, at any time before service of the section 21 notice, given the tenant a copy of the gas safety certificate which was in force before entering into occupation and a copy of any further certificate which related to a subsequent inspection. It was therefore immaterial that the January 2017 certificate had not been given to R until November 2017. There was, however, a factual dispute as to whether the 2018 certificate had been provided to R and that was remitted for consideration by the County Court.

Points to note/consider

  1. This decision will be greeted with relief by landlords as it has resolved an issue that has been hotly debated in recent years. It certainly did seem harsh for a landlord to be permanently precluded from serving a section 21 notice where there might only have been a slight delay in providing a copy of the relevant gas safety certificate to its tenant. In this case, TH had carried out a gas safety check before the AST was entered into (it had just not provided a copy to R). What is not clear from this case is what the position is if no check has been carried out before a tenant goes into occupation. Whether a landlord is permanently barred from serving a section 21 notice in those circumstances is perhaps a question for another day.

  2. Many annual gas safety checks will have been missed because of the current crisis. However, the obligation to carry out an annual test in regulation 36(3) of the 1998 Regulations is not a ‘prescribed requirement’ (only the obligation to provide the tenant with a copy of the certificate in regulation 36(6)(a)). So that in itself will not preclude a landlord from serving a section 21 notice.

focus on...

Shining a light: practical tips around Chinese buyers investing in UK property

View our on-demand video. In these uncertain times, clarity is what people seek. That is why we are “Shining a Light” and providing some practical training as regards property ownership and tax in the UK.

View

Legal updates

Vodafone Ltd v Hanover Capital Ltd [2020] EW Misc 18 (CC)

The first reported case on how a court determines rent on the renewal of a lease of a telecommunications mast site under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 following the Electronic Communications Code 2017 coming into force.

View

Legal updates

EMI Group Ltd v The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd [2020] EWHC 2061 (Ch)

The court interprets the guarantee provisions in a lease to uphold their validity under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.

View

Legal updates

Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd [2020] UKSC 36

An exclusivity covenant given by a landlord of a shopping centre to an anchor tenant was not declared unenforceable under the common law doctrine of restraint of trade.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up