0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

does a breach of an obligation in an agreement for lease allow the tenant to refuse to complete the lease?

4 April 2019

A tenant who does not want to be forced to complete a lease if an obligation in the agreement for lease is breached must provide expressly for this in the agreement.

In a recent case, the agreement for lease prevented the landlord from making variations to the landlord’s works (the construction of student accommodation) which materially affected the size of the rooms. The agreement provided that a size reduction of more than 3% from the original drawings was deemed material. In contravention of this provision, the landlord built some rooms which were more than 3% smaller.

The Court of Appeal decided that although the parties could spell out exactly what type of breach would allow the tenant to terminate an agreement, that was not what the parties had done here and it would not make commercial sense if any breach of the agreed size tolerance level (e.g. an undersized bin store) automatically allowed the tenant to terminate the agreement.

In this case, the tenant is possibly facing the unpalatable prospect of having to complete a long lease of student accommodation with 56 rooms smaller than specified.

It makes sense to agree at heads of terms stage what breaches will give rise to termination so that both parties are clear from the outset and this can then be built into the agreement for lease.

related opinions

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up