0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Co-operative Group Food Ltd v A & A Shah Properties Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 941(Ch)

3 July 2019


The appellant (G) was the guarantor (following a transfer of engagements) under a lease granted in 2006 and expiring in 2031. The original tenant under the lease was Somerfield Stores Ltd (T).

In 2011, a licence to assign was granted by the landlord (L) and the lease was duly assigned from T to 99p Stores Ltd (A). The form of authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) required on assignment was in a schedule to the licence and a recital in the licence provided that:

“The Schedule forms part of this Licence and shall have effect as if set out in full in the body of this Licence. Any reference to this Licence includes the Schedule.”

Clause 4.1 of the licence provided that:

“The Tenant [T] and the Tenant's Guarantor [G] covenant to observe and perform the obligations set out in the Authorised Guarantee Agreement immediately after completion of the assignment.”

Clause 4.2 of the licence provided that:

“…..the Tenant's Guarantor agrees that its guarantee and other obligations under the Lease shall remain fully effective and:
(a)  to the extent that any provision of this Licence varies the terms of the Lease shall apply to the Lease as varied; and
(b)  shall extend and apply to the covenants given by and the obligations on the part of the Tenant under this Licence.”

Both T and A went into administration. L therefore sought rent from G.


Were clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of the licence to assign direct guarantees by G of A’s obligations under the lease (in which case they were void) or guarantees by G of T’s obligations under the AGA (i.e. sub-guarantees or GAGAs) (in which case they were valid)?


  1. Clause 4.1 was a direct guarantee. Both T and G covenanted to observe the obligations under the AGA and the obligations under the AGA were direct guarantees of A’s obligations under the lease.
  2.  Clause 4.2 was a sub-guarantee. The recital to the licence made it clear that the licence included the AGA. By clause 4.2(b) of the licence, G was therefore agreeing to guarantee T’s obligations under the AGA.

Points to note/consider

  1. Whilst this case is about interpretation, it is a useful reminder of how the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (the 1995 Act) has been interpreted by the courts. Both parties in this case accepted that the relevant case-law in this area (Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) and K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 904) meant that a direct guarantee by a guarantor of an assignee’s obligations under a lease was void (as falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act), but a guarantee of a former tenant’s liability under an AGA was valid.
  2.  For the sake of completeness, it is also important to remember that the case of EMI Group Ltd v O & H Q1 Ltd [2016] EWHC 529 (Ch) decided that an assignment from a tenant to its guarantor is void (again for falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act).

focus on...

Legal updates

Government extends tenant protections and introduces new code of practice

On 19 June 2020, the Government announced that it was extending the various tenant protections it has brought in over the last few months and, at the same time, published a new voluntary code of practice to provide clarity for businesses when discussing rental payments and to encourage best practice so that all parties are supported.


Legal updates

A landlord’s remedies to recover arrears of rent – where are we now?

The Corporate Governance and Insolvency Bill provides detail on the new measures to safeguard the high street against aggressive debt recovery actions during coronavirus.


Legal updates

New measures announced to protect the High Street from aggressive rent collection and closure

In a move that will be greatly welcomed by retailers, the Government announced on 23 April that it will introduce new measures to safeguard the High Street against aggressive debt recovery actions during the coronavirus pandemic.


Legal updates

Getting through lockdown – your real estate questions answered

Find out more about the confusion around the Government’s support measures for business tenants and what to do if you have a break right during lock down.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up