0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Co-operative Group Food Ltd v A & A Shah Properties Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 941(Ch)

3 July 2019

Facts

The appellant (G) was the guarantor (following a transfer of engagements) under a lease granted in 2006 and expiring in 2031. The original tenant under the lease was Somerfield Stores Ltd (T).

In 2011, a licence to assign was granted by the landlord (L) and the lease was duly assigned from T to 99p Stores Ltd (A). The form of authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) required on assignment was in a schedule to the licence and a recital in the licence provided that:

“The Schedule forms part of this Licence and shall have effect as if set out in full in the body of this Licence. Any reference to this Licence includes the Schedule.”

Clause 4.1 of the licence provided that:

“The Tenant [T] and the Tenant's Guarantor [G] covenant to observe and perform the obligations set out in the Authorised Guarantee Agreement immediately after completion of the assignment.”

Clause 4.2 of the licence provided that:

“…..the Tenant's Guarantor agrees that its guarantee and other obligations under the Lease shall remain fully effective and:
(a)  to the extent that any provision of this Licence varies the terms of the Lease shall apply to the Lease as varied; and
(b)  shall extend and apply to the covenants given by and the obligations on the part of the Tenant under this Licence.”

Both T and A went into administration. L therefore sought rent from G.

Issue

Were clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of the licence to assign direct guarantees by G of A’s obligations under the lease (in which case they were void) or guarantees by G of T’s obligations under the AGA (i.e. sub-guarantees or GAGAs) (in which case they were valid)?

Decision

  1. Clause 4.1 was a direct guarantee. Both T and G covenanted to observe the obligations under the AGA and the obligations under the AGA were direct guarantees of A’s obligations under the lease.
  2.  Clause 4.2 was a sub-guarantee. The recital to the licence made it clear that the licence included the AGA. By clause 4.2(b) of the licence, G was therefore agreeing to guarantee T’s obligations under the AGA.

Points to note/consider

  1. Whilst this case is about interpretation, it is a useful reminder of how the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (the 1995 Act) has been interpreted by the courts. Both parties in this case accepted that the relevant case-law in this area (Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) and K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 904) meant that a direct guarantee by a guarantor of an assignee’s obligations under a lease was void (as falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act), but a guarantee of a former tenant’s liability under an AGA was valid.
  2.  For the sake of completeness, it is also important to remember that the case of EMI Group Ltd v O & H Q1 Ltd [2016] EWHC 529 (Ch) decided that an assignment from a tenant to its guarantor is void (again for falling foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 25 of the 1995 Act).

focus on...

Legal updates

TFS Stores Ltd v The Designer Retail Outlet Centres (Mansfield) Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 1363 (Ch)

A rare case on the validity of the process to contract out of the security of tenure provisions contained in sections 24 to 28 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

View

Legal updates

Landlord succeeds in opposing business tenant’s right of renewal by contriving an entirely artificial scheme of works

The judgment in S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2017] EWHC 1670 (QB) was handed down on 3 July 2017, and it certainly makes for interesting reading.

View

Legal updates

Property Managers Association event 2015

For the third year running, we are delighted to host this year’s Property Managers Association training session. Download slides from the event.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up