Whose clause is it anyway?
Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the spotlight has increasingly been on force majeure and termination clauses in contracts.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication
Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the spotlight has increasingly been on force majeure and termination clauses in contracts. Much has been written about how such clauses may give rights to contracting parties but also how they can create risks for unwary businesses. Force majeure will without doubt become a battleground for disputes around many issues, from service delivery and impact on payment obligations through to the potential termination of the contract. However, before going into battle on the impact of a force majeure clause or an entitlement to terminate a contract, it is important to first consider what terms have actually been agreed by the parties.
Recap on force majeure
Force majeure clauses generally provide that, upon the occurrence of a specified act, event or circumstance which is outside of a party’s reasonable control, that party will be excused from performing part or all of its specific obligations under the contract and will not be liable to the other party for failing to perform those obligations.
When looking at the correct interpretation of a force majeure clause, the specific words used in the clause itself must be scrutinised, having regard to the contract as a whole. There is no general doctrine of force majeure and so it essentially comes down to the application of the clause itself.
Whose terms apply?
Before jumping into a review of force majeure or termination provisions, thought must be given as to how the contract was formed in the first place, as that will determine what terms and conditions bind the parties. In some situations, there will be no doubt as to what the contractual terms are: this is usually where there is a binding written contract, accepted by both parties, with only one set of terms and conditions in play. However, often that is not necessarily the case.
Consider for example the following scenarios:
- Both parties have sent each other their own terms and conditions (T&Cs) at different times and potentially in different ways, for example on the back of an order, acknowledgement, delivery note, invoice, or even by reference to their website. This is a classic ‘battle of the forms’ scenario.
- The parties have agreed the majority (but not all) of the terms contained in a draft contract, but the agreement was never finalised or perhaps signed before the parties started performing it.
- A draft written contract was in circulation between the parties, but they then started working together on substantially different terms to those in the written document.
- A contract was not set out in writing but can be demonstrated by the repeated conduct of the parties.
Each scenario can give rise to some complicated issues in assessing what terms and conditions bind the parties. They are also typical of the issues that the pandemic is highlighting as parties consider whether they can take the benefit of a force majeure or termination provision.
Consider again the four scenarios:
- Party A relies upon a force majeure or termination clause in its T&Cs, but Party B’s T&Cs were the last T&Cs to be supplied before the contract was formed. Party B’s T&Cs contain no force majeure clause and entirely different termination provisions.
- One of the terms that the parties had not agreed upon in a draft written agreement concerns the specific events that would be included in a force majeure clause, such as pandemics and governmental actions.
- A broadly worded force majeure clause is contained in a written agreement, but the parties have never acted in accordance with any of the material terms contained in the written agreement.
- A party claims force majeure applies to their business relationship, but there is nothing in writing.
Clearly in these situations, businesses need to understand what terms and conditions bind the parties to a contract before delving into the specific wording and impact of force majeure or termination clauses, or indeed any other clauses.
Conclusion
Given the considerable supply chain disruption which has already been caused by Covid-19, it is more important than ever to carry out a proper review of how a supply contract was formed so as to establish precisely what rights and obligations bind the parties. Only then can parties look more closely at any prospect of invoking force majeure or a perceived right to terminate.
If you require any assistance in reviewing your contracts, considering how Covid-19 may have impacted on performance of those contracts, or what the likely consequences might be, please do get in touch.
Contact

Paul Kirkpatrick
Partner
Paul.Kirkpatrick@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2318
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
In Person Event
'Autonomous vehicles: what the future holds' event
Press Release
Browne Jacobson named ‘Law Firm of the Year’ as it picks up a record four awards at East Midlands Dealmakers
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on Blazehill Capital’s second £250m facility which will support the UK business market
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises privacy-first ad tech company Covatic on Series A investment led by Manchester based Praetura Ventures
Press Release
Browne Jacobson announces completion of employee acquisition of Two Twenty
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on merger of leading UK frozen food wholesalers Hopwells and Windsor Foodservice
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s North-West banking specialists advise ThinCats on £10m facility to arcade bar operator NQ64
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Sodexo Live! on its move to 100% stake in global sports, travel and hospitality provider STH
Opinion
Mediation – remote or in person?
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Apiary Capital on its on tenth investment into ‘Outstanding’ professional education provider
Press Release
Browne Jacobson act on the sale of UK’s largest tech enabled confectionery distributor and wholesaler IBG
Press Release
Browne Jacobson launches specialist Ascensus programme for in house lawyers and business leaders
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise on sale of asbestos risk management consultancy to AIM listed business
On-Demand
Ascensus – the programme for in-house lawyers and business leaders’ launch event
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on strategic sale of cybersecurity firm Nowcomm
Article
Interest from Asia boosts investor confidence in UK commercial real estate
Opinion
Confirmation of ACAS early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises on four transactions for AIM-quoted FinTech business Equals Group plc
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Leicestershire based tech compliance specialists Obsequio Group on two key investment deals for build and buy strategy
Published Article
ClientEarth claim may expand scope of directors' duties
On-Demand
NSIA: the thorn in the side of M&A?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Legal Update
Product distribution – how to protect yourself from an early exit
Press Release
Browne Jacobson dealmakers advise B Corp certified Edit Agency on its investment into data insight agency Wood for Trees
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on disposal of Sella Controls to HIMA Group
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s dealmakers advise leading door hardware supplier and manufacturer UAP on its acquisition of Maher London
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson dealmakers announce completion of over 130 deals worth billions in value in 2022 and eye up healthy pipeline for 2023
Legal Update
Banking Transaction Updates - January 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Superscript on £45m Series B funding round to transform its SME insurtech offering
Legal Update
MEES: Are you ready for April 2023?
With only a few months left until the next phase of changes in the application of the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES), it is important for both landlords and tenants of commercial property in England and Wales to review their property portfolios.Press Release
Manchester dealmakers advise Maven Capital Partners on £1m investment in fintech disruptor Nivo Solutions
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Grant Funding and Collaboration Agreements
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.