Predicted surge in data privacy litigation claims
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in May that individuals can seek compensation for non-material damages resulting from General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) violations. In this article we consider the potential implications for insurers.
The case
The case considered an Austrian citizen who sued the country’s postal service for processing their data without their consent. The Claimant sought reparations for ‘non-material damage’ under GDPR’s liability regime, alleging that they had been caused substantial distress. In its defence the postal service asserted that the Claimant data subject had not suffered sufficient damage.
The national court was unsure as to the extent to which compensation rights for non-material damages apply under GDPR’s Article 82, so it referred the case to the ECJ.
ECJ decision
The ECJ ruled that:
‘Not every infringement of the GDPR gives rise, in itself, to a right of compensation’.
However, there is no requirement for non-material damage to reach a certain threshold of seriousness to confer a right to compensation. As such, data subjects seeking compensation for GDPR breaches can do so without proving that a specific threshold for the seriousness of the harm is met. It is then for national courts to decide on the appropriate level of damages.
Considerations for insurers
Despite the claimant still having to prove a GDPR violation and a causal link between the violation and the harm, this decision could result in an increase in data privacy claims against businesses.
However, this case must be balanced against the case of Lloyd v Google, in which the Supreme Court held that a mere loss of control over data does not automatically result in compensation. Indeed, the ruling of the ECJ is not binding on English courts following Brexit. Nevertheless, the decision could still be persuasive and influential in judges’ decision making in the UK. As such, insurers and underwriters should consider the scope of coverage they offer to policy holders, particularly under management liability, professional indemnity and cyber wordings, where cover for data privacy claims is often provided.
Additionally, insurers may also wish to consider incorporating tighter conditions into their wordings in relation to GDPR compliance.
Contents
Key contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
You may be interested in...
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Legal Update
Unravelling the challenges and opportunities in UK sports governance
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises European micromobility insurtech Laka on investment from Achmea Innovation Fund
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, March 2024
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Legal Update
Commercial Court considers requests for stay or anti-suit injunction where two competing reinsurance wordings
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Legal Update
Parametric flood policies - Insurers no longer in uncharted waters?
Legal Update
LockBit unlocked: International taskforce takes down major cyber criminal organisation
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
80% of GAP market pause sales amid Consumer Duty concerns
Legal Update
FCA writes to MPs over car insurance premiums. What do increases mean for fraud?
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: A new landscape for restoration clauses
Legal Update
The regulators’ pet project
Legal Update
Welsh Government inks new regulations for Acupuncture, Body piercing, Electrolysis and Tattooing
Legal Update
Insurance and the escalating situation in Suez Canal
Legal Update
Update: Further debates on the Automated Vehicles Bill in the House of Lords this month
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, February 2024
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, January 2024
Legal Update
Voldemort causes havoc at Sellafield – nuclear risks and insurance policies
Legal Update
Adapting to change or falling behind? The FCA under fire from the National Audit Office
Legal Update
A blow to manufacturers as Thai Court confirms insurers’ denial of cover in wind turbine case
Legal Update
Premium finance – a poverty premium
Legal Update
'Clear and unambiguous' exclusions: Cameron Soule v Woodward Design + Build LLC
Legal Update
Follow the leader: Insurers using algorithmic underwriting
Legal Update
Insurance Insights 2024
Legal Update
Statutory assignment to insurers not caught by no-assignment clause
Legal Update
Court of Appeal decision again demonstrates the need for reform of the Solicitors Minimum Terms
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, December 2023
Legal Update - London Market Quarterly
London Market, Autumn 2023: What the insurance market needs to know
![Al Mana Lifestyle Trading L.L.C. & Others v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 61 – Update](/getattachment/b24270a8-0bb3-4a8a-bcf0-37830f99591b/shutterstock_710149084_6x4.jpg?variant=HeroImageTabletVariantDefinition)
Legal Update
Al Mana Lifestyle Trading L.L.C. & Others v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Others [2023] EWCA Civ 61 – Update
Legal Update
Proposed amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Update
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Legal Update
Chubb leads a $50m consortium to help mitigate the increasing risks associated with lithium-ion batteries
Legal Update
Climate change related insurance decisions being made around the world
Legal Update
D&O: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘personal advantage'
Legal Update
Trade credit: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘recoveries’
