Importance of considering flexible working applications
An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.
An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.
The employee made a request, following maternity leave, to work 4 days per week instead of 5 and to leave work at 5pm instead of 6pm to allow her to pick up her daughter from nursery.
The judge determined that the employee had been indirectly discriminated against based on sex when her employer refused the request. Although the employer relied on 5 of the 8 statutory reasons for refusal, substantial explanation was not provided.
The employee’s internal appeal was also rejected by her employer.
The employee was awarded compensation for loss of earnings, loss of pension contributions, injury to feelings and interest. However, was unsuccessful in her other claims of maternity/ pregnancy discrimination and harassment.
This case serves as a useful reminder to employers that if flexible working applications are not dealt with adequately employees can complain to the employment tribunal.
Employers are legally obliged to consider and reasonably deal with all flexible working requests made under the statutory scheme.
Requests should be dealt with within 3 months; this period can be extended by agreement. In this time employers must consider the request, inform employee of outcome and deal with any appeal. ACAS has a Code of Practice on handling in a reasonable manner requests to work flexibly.
Employers can refuse requests for 1 of 8 reasons set out in legislation. However reasonable consideration needs to be given before a request is refused. Responses to request should be provided in writing with explanation for refusal, if appropriate, provided.
Bear in mind, employees can make flexible working requests for any reason if they have 26 weeks’ continuous employment. Only one request can be made in a 12-month period.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
New Rights for Working Parents and Carers
Opinion
The NHS pay deal – are all Agenda for Change staff eligible?
Opinion
Further three-day junior doctors strike announced for June
Opinion
Non-compete clauses - proposed changes to employment contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson welcomes new Manchester employment partner Lee Ashwood
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law Bill – sunsetting the sunset
Legal Update
“Smarter Regulation” – proposed employment changes ahead
Opinion
New bill reaches tipping point: bill on allocation of tips at final stages
Opinion
Pay deal reached for Agenda for Change employees
Published Article
Third Party Harassment – haven’t we been here before?
Opinion
Injunction means nurses’ strike will be cut short
Opinion
New Acas guidance on mental health reasonable adjustments
Legal Update
Industrial action update: school strikes
Opinion
Further industrial action announced as RCN reject pay deal
Opinion
Confirmation of Acas early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Published Article
Managing flexible working requests – how to stay on the right side of the law
Legal Update
A pandemic legacy: flexibility
Opinion
Gender pay gap reporting – what are my obligations?
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
