A tenant who does not want to be forced to complete a lease if an obligation in the agreement for lease is breached must provide expressly for this in the agreement.
A tenant who does not want to be forced to complete a lease if an obligation in the agreement for lease is breached must provide expressly for this in the agreement.
In a recent case, the agreement for lease prevented the landlord from making variations to the landlord’s works (the construction of student accommodation) which materially affected the size of the rooms. The agreement provided that a size reduction of more than 3% from the original drawings was deemed material. In contravention of this provision, the landlord built some rooms which were more than 3% smaller.
The Court of Appeal decided that although the parties could spell out exactly what type of breach would allow the tenant to terminate an agreement, that was not what the parties had done here and it would not make commercial sense if any breach of the agreed size tolerance level (e.g. an undersized bin store) automatically allowed the tenant to terminate the agreement.
In this case, the tenant is possibly facing the unpalatable prospect of having to complete a long lease of student accommodation with 56 rooms smaller than specified.
It makes sense to agree at heads of terms stage what breaches will give rise to termination so that both parties are clear from the outset and this can then be built into the agreement for lease.
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
