0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Shared Insights: The Mental Capacity Act - when to go to the Court of Protection - practical guidance for NHS Trusts

17 November 2020

These insights were shared at our fortnightly online forum for NHS professionals on 17 November 2020. To find out more please visit our Shared Insights hub.

David Edwards, Lawyer in the Official Solicitor’s (OS’) Healthcare and welfare team spoke with Chris Stark, Partner and Victoria Colclough, Senior Associate at Browne Jacobson about when NHS Trusts should consider going to the Court of Protection.

The Shared Insights were:

  • Autonomy of the individual is very important, even when they lack capacity.
  • Capacity is time and decision specific and assumed until established otherwise. Unwise decisions are not in themselves evidence of a lack of capacity.
  • It is the person offering treatment who should usually carry out a capacity assessment. Specialist input can be obtained in difficult cases.
  • Remember to assess against all elements of the two-stage test.
  • The individual has to be able to understand the salient factors and not every aspect of a decision.
  • Consider whether all practical steps been taken to facilitate capacity within the timescale available.
  • When undertaking a capacity assessment, be sure to “show your working” i.e. that the individual has been provided with the necessary information. Include a detailed note, with information about how the individual has responded to that information.
  • There are a number of situations where consideration needs to be given to bringing an application to the Court of Protection. Mr Justice Hayden set out his views in January 2020 in his guidance.
  • Applications should be made in good time. The courts will be unsympathetic when an urgent application could have been avoided with appropriate planning. The Official Solicitor, Sarah Castle, is often appointed to act as litigation friend for cases coming to the Court of Protection (and especially in serious medical treatment cases), though there are other possible litigation friends.
  • In serious medical treatment cases Trust’s usually have to agree to meet 50% of the OS’ reasonable costs.
  • Some practical tips from the OS include making sure all relevant Trusts are in attendance, talk to the individual about the application being made (unless there is good reason not to) and have medical records ready to be disclosed.

Download PDF

Focus on...

Legal updates

Hospitals as ‘placements’ for looked after children under the age of 16

With effect from Thursday 9 September 2021 the amendments contained within the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/161) (‘the Regulations’) come into effect which introduces regulation 27A.


Care business briefing - a new normal?

With signs of a return to “the new normal” over the coming months, we are pleased to invite you to our on-demand webinar looking at the regulatory aspects of care


Legal updates

Shared Insights: the future of interaction between health and social care

This session discussed the future of interaction between NHS Trusts and local government amidst a drive for better integrated care.


Legal updates

Shared Insights: Learning from operating theatre claims and the challenges of service recovery post-pandemic

In this Shared Insights session, we discussed how prior to the pandemic, looking at the themes and learning arising from Operating Theatre claims between 2010 and 2020 and about the challenges faced by NHS Trusts as they seek to restore surgical and other services post-pandemic.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up