0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Oakley and others v Harper McKay Developments Ltd [2018] EWHC 3405 (Ch)

3 April 2019

Failing to assign the copyright in plans on or before completion could have meant that a seller’s notice to complete was invalid.


The sellers (S) entered into a contract to sell property for residential development to the buyer (B) for £2.225m. The contract obliged S to assign to B the copyright in plans and reports prepared by S’s architects (the Plans).

After a revised contractual completion date had passed without completion taking place, S served a notice to complete on B. As B then failed to complete within 10 working days from service of the notice to complete, S purported to rescind the contract (and forfeit B’s deposit).

B argued that S had not been ready, able and willing to complete when it served the notice to complete as S had not by then complied with its obligation to assign the copyright in the Plans to B.


Was S ready, able and willing to complete when it served its notice to complete (if not, the notice to complete would be invalid)?


The court agreed with B that a failure to assign the copyright in the Plans to B was a matter of substance (not an administrative formality) so potentially S could not be said to have been ready, able and willing to complete when it served the notice to complete.

Rather than assign the copyright, S had obtained from the architects a non-exclusive licence to reproduce the Plans. However, despite numerous opportunities to do so, B had never objected to this. By its conduct, B was taken therefore to have waived its right to insist on a full assignment of the copyright. Having therefore procured sufficient licences to use the Plans, S had accordingly been ready, able and willing to complete when it served the notice to complete.

Points to note/consider

1. Despite the outcome here, this case is an important reminder of what ready, able and willing to complete means when looking to serve a notice to complete. It usually boils down to whether there are matters of substance still outstanding or whether what is outstanding are merely administrative arrangements necessary to enable completion to take place within the time-frame specified in the notice to complete.

2. B argued that any waiver of its right to insist on an assignment of the copyright in the Plans was a material variation of the contract and therefore void for failing to comply with the formalities in section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 (which applies to variations in a contract to dispose of an interest in land as much as it applies to the creation of such contracts). The court however decided that section 2 did not apply to a waiver of a right under a contract (as opposed to an express material variation).

focus on...

Legal updates

Electronic signatures in conveyancing

On 9 July the Land Registry published draft guidance setting out the basis on which it will accept for registration transfers (and certain other deeds) that have been signed electronically.


Legal updates

Treasury consults on future lending terms of the Public Works Loan Board

The consultation has been prompted by the specific issue of ‘debt for yield’ to ensure that the PWLB can continue to support local authority investment.


Brexit resources

UK shared prosperity fund

The UKSPF has been proposed to replace the EU ESI funding for less developed regions, however a number of issues require resolution before the fund can be set up.

View brexit resources

Legal updates

Modern Slavery Act 2015 - updated statutory guidance for public authorities in England and Wales

This is timely guidance given that modern slavery will not be exempt from the health, social and economic challenges brought about by Covid-19.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

David Harris

David Harris

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up