0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

when does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

10 October 2019

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.    

The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.  The CoA helpfully summarised the approach to be taken in classifying matters of professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS:

  • The defining characteristic is that it arises from the exercise of medical skills. This does not mean anything done by a doctor in the course of his or her work will be covered.
  • Professional misconduct will normally (but not always) equate to clinical misconduct (i.e. misconduct in the course of the treatment of patients).
  • The question as to whether something arises from the exercise of medical skills is an imprecise test – in carrying out this assessment, it is helpful to consider whether the resolution of the issue requires the experience and expertise of an independent doctor.
  • It is legitimate to attach weight as to whether the individual has challenged the characterisation of the allegations during internal proceedings.

In this case, the CoA was satisfied that the fact that the Appellant was a doctor, was nothing more than the context in which the allegations arose – those allegations all related to her relationship with members of management and other colleagues or staff.  The issues were therefore managerial (or personal) in nature, and not matters of professional misconduct.

The arguments put forward by the Appellant as to why the allegations could, in the alternative, amount to capability issues, were less sustained. The CoA was satisfied that allegations of this nature (rudeness, bullying, and intransigence with management), in the absence of any suggestion of any underlying medical conditions, had rightly been characterised as issue of conduct rather than capability.

This decision doesn’t change the previous approach taken to matters of professional misconduct but it is a helpful reminder of the approach that will be taken. Ultimately, the classification of whether a conduct issue is personal or professional remains a matter for the tribunal and courts – however, a documented reasoning as to classification during internal proceedings may well be helpful in demonstrating that the issue has been considered seriously by an employer. This reasoning should include an assessment as to whether an independent medical opinion would be useful in resolving the matters in dispute. 

Employers may find, however, that more challenges to classification are raised during internal proceedings to avoid any detrimental inferences being drawn in subsequent legal proceedings.

related opinions

Credit broking: know your permissions

To operate lawfully, firms that broker credit to consumers by way of business must be registered with and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

View blog

Does Ossett United FC’s decision open the floodgates for claims by injured sports players?

Ossett United FC is a football club based in Yorkshire, playing in the Northern Premier League. On 12 November 2019, they lost a claim for damages brought by Rees Welsh, a semi-professional player from an opposing team.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

View blog

Sarah Hooton

Sarah Hooton

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up