0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

underestimate of court fees leads to strike out

23 December 2016

In a case handled by Browne Jacobson LLP, an underestimate of the court fee by the claimant’s solicitors on an employers liability matter has led to its strike out in its entirety by the court, saving an estimated £85,000 in damages.

The claimant Mr Stiff, employed by a construction and plant operator training business Aurelia Ltd claimed to be severely psychologically injured with PTSD and depression, and minor orthopaedic injuries when his vehicle collided with a gate at the entrance to the works. In the course of handling the claim his solicitors provided several schedules estimating financial losses all of which exceeded £50,000. At the point of issue, shortly prior to expiry of limitation, the claimant sought to limit the value of his claim to £50,000 and paid a commensurate court fee.

In a heavily contested application the company argued that the claimant’s actions amounted to an abuse of process following Lewis v Ward Hadaway, and that for limitation purposes the case had not been issued as the wrong fee had been paid. As the wheels of justice had not been set in motion, the court was minded to both strike out and/or give summary judgment for the company, leaving the claimant empty handed and/or facing a costs order.

The increased court fees have caused some controversy. Firms are best advised to avoid the temptation of pitching low as courts are unwilling to entertain claims which abuse the court process.

related opinions

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Money laundering – a new focus?

It is important to recognise that organisations and individuals do not have to intend to launder money or even to act dishonestly in order to commit money laundering offences.

View blog

Disclosure of material created during internal investigations

The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down one of the most awaited court judgments in recent times, Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2006.

View blog

Applying QOCS protection in a claim for personal injury and something else

In The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown [2018], the High Court ruled that a Circuit Judge was wrong to automatically apply QOCS protection to a claim for misuse of data which also included a claim for personal injury.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up