In this update we set out and consider enhancing public confidence and accountability.
In the Foreword to the 'Integration and innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all' White Paper it is stated that:
At its heart, however, this Bill is about backing our health and care system and everyone who works in it. Our proposals build on the NHS’s own – those in the Long Term Plan. We’re also outlining steps to support everyone who works to meet people’s health and care needs. Taken together, they will help us build back better after Covid.
Below, each legal proposal in the section on Enhancing public confidence and accountability is set out and considered. The other sections will be considered in separate articles and we will also publish more detailed articles on specific topics. However, overall it is apparent that the proposals do enable the development of an integrated care system which is not possible under the current legislative framework.
In setting out a brief overview of the proposals for legislation the headings in the White Paper have been adopted.
The purpose of this proposal, to formally merge NHS England and NHS Improvement, is to remove the remaining bureaucratic and legislative barriers, so that NHSEI will legally be one organisation to provide unified national leadership for the NHS. The indication from the White Paper is that the new merged body will be called NHS England.
As a newly merged public body, NHS England will remain answerable to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (SSHSC) and Parliament for all aspects of NHS performance, finance and care transformation. Recognising this evolution from combining the different bodies current functions, the government are also bringing forward a complementary proposal to ensure the SSHSC has appropriate intervention powers with respect to NHS England. It is intended this will maintain clinical and day to day operational independence for the NHS but will support accountability by allowing the SSHSC to formally direct NHS England in relation to relevant functions. This will support system accountability and agility, and also enable the Government to support NHS England to align its work effectively with wider priorities for health and social care, thereby reinforcing the accountability of the SSHSC and Government for the NHS and the wider health and care system.
The three bodies that will merge to create the new NHS England have already been effectively working together as a single organisation for over two years. In formally merging the bodies then clarity on system leadership is provided and it should enable a more flexible approach to developing integrated care systems across the country. As to the re-establishment of greater intervention powers for the SSHSC, it has been apparent for some time that the Government has wanted to reverse those aspects of the Health and Social Care Act 2012.
The Mandate will cover the merged NHS England statutory body and to allow it to set direction in a more strategic way than currently permitted by the annual cycle, the Government’s proposal is to replace the current legislative requirement to have a new mandate each year with a new requirement to always have a mandate in place. In so doing, they are seeking to provide the flexibility for the Mandate to be replaced to respond to changing strategic needs, emerging evidence on deliverability or appropriateness of objectives, or external events, rather than having to wait until the next annual opportunity.
Other proposed changes are that NHS England’s capital and resource limits will now be set within the annual financial directions, rather than the Mandate. Also, that the current legal provisions on integration (the Better Care Fund), which currently rely on the NHS mandate, will be recreated as a standalone power, that means they can meet the policy intention for the Better Care Fund even where Mandates are not replaced annually.
These proposals fit with giving the system greater flexibility to be able to plan for the future and also react to emerging strategic needs, such as a pandemic.
The Government’s view is that the current system for reconfigurations works well for most service changes, and so it will remain in place for the majority of changes in the future. However, it does want to broaden the SSHSC’s powers to intervene as currently that can only happen on receiving a local authority referral, following which he may commission the Independent Reconfiguration Panel to provide recommendations to enable him to make his decision on the referral.
Therefore, the Government is proposing to broaden the scope for potential ministerial intervention in reconfigurations, creating a clear line of accountability, by allowing the SSHSC to intervene at any point in the reconfiguration process. In doing so, he will be required to seek appropriate advice in advance of any decision, including in relation to value for money, and subsequently publish it in a transparent manner.
To support this new intervention power, it is proposed a new process for reconfiguration will be introduced that will enable the SSHSC to intervene earlier and also to enable speedier local decision-making. New statutory guidance on how the new process will work, as well as removing the current local authority referral process to avoid creating any conflicts of interest, will be published in due course.
As to the role of the Independent Reconfiguration Panel, then that will end and be replaced by new arrangements.
The White Paper indicates that the Government does not anticipate this new intervention power being used with great frequency but where there are issues that Ministers have concluded need to be pressed to a resolution, this will provide a means of doing so.
It is correct to state that some service reconfigurations have been subject to a state of limbo in recent years as a result of a referral by a local authority to the SSHSC. The same can also be said of decisions on service reconfiguration being challenged by judicial review, although that type of challenge in terms of proceedings being commenced is subject to the need for ‘promptness’. As ever, the devil will be in the detail of the new process, but the proposal does not suggest the whole overview and scrutiny role of local authorities will be removed and if that is to remain, then one question will be what ability will they have to challenge service reconfiguration decisions.
Alternatively, will they simply be able to request the SSHSC intervene or will we see greater resolution of disputes happening through the new ICS statutory body? It will also be interesting to see how the expertise which the IRP have developed over the years will be retained to support the new proposals.
Service reconfiguration has often been the subject of intense local debate and it will be interesting to see whether the new process, when announced, will enable easier resolution of differences in local communities so the NHS can proceed with often much needed changes.
During the course of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic the Government notes the need to streamline core activities across ALBs. As a result, the White Paper proposes creating a power in primary legislation for the SSHSC to transfer functions to and from specified ALBs. That will enable the SSHSC to review where functions are best delivered in order to support a more flexible, adaptive and responsive system. Further, in cases where an ALB becomes redundant as a result of transfer of its functions, this power will also include the ability to abolish that ALB.
The exercise of the powers will only be via a Statutory Instrument (SI), following formal consultation, including with devolved administrations where necessary.
This proposal does follow one of the White Paper’s general purposes to create greater flexibility in the NHS framework to adapt and evolve to health needs as they develop.
There are currently five SpHAs, each with their own distinct and important roles. These are the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA), the NHS Trust Development Authority (TDA), NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), NHS Resolution (NHSR) and the NHS Counter Fraud Authority (NHSCFA).
The Government’s proposal will remove the three-year time limit on all SpHAs. That is because they view the time limit as unnecessary, as the functions of the SpHAs are enduring, and inconsistent, as it currently only impacts the CFA. Therefore, in removing this time limit, the Government’s view is that they are ensuring all SpHAs, both current and future ones, are treated equally in legislation and removing the bureaucratic, time consuming and duplicative process.
As with other proposals, this is very much looking at reducing bureaucracy that is unnecessary and creates delay.
The White Paper is proposing to create a duty for the SSHSC to publish a document, once every five years, which sets out roles and responsibilities for workforce planning and supply in England. This document would:
It is accepted that workforce issues created through Brexit and gaps in the availability of healthcare workers and clinicians need to be addressed. This proposal would, in the view of the Government, provide greater transparency in addressing the workforce issues.
The proposals in the White Paper on Enhancing public confidence and accountability, address a wide variety of issues but do centre on making clear where responsibility for functions will lie and support the proposals on reducing bureaucracy. Those over changes for dealing with concerns over service reconfigurations and addressing workforce issues, will undoubtedly be focussed on. Certainly, it will be interesting to see the further detail on how the new intervention process on reconfigurations will operate and what is contained in the new workforce planning document. Clearly, they will be important for the new ICS statutory bodies to understand when looking to address workforce issues or reconfigure how service are delivered.
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Three months on from the commencement of the new statutory Integrated Care Systems (ICS) Anja Beriro and Gerrard Hanratty reflect on the main themes and issues that have come from the new relationship between local government and health.
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
On Saturday 15 October a wave of light swept the internet when thousands of people flooded social media with pictures of candles to remember the babies that they have lost. This event signifies the end of Baby Loss Awareness Week which aims to break the silence that is associated with baby loss in pregnancy and infancy.
The Coronavirus Act 2020 allowed any registered medical practitioner to sign a medical certificate of cause of death (“MCCD”), even if the deceased was not attended to during his or her last illness and not seen after death, provided that the medical practitioner could state the cause of death to the best of their knowledge and belief.
In our latest Shared Insights session, Focus on Emergency Medicine, chaired by Jennifer Fagin and Amelia Newbold, we were pleased to be joined by: Dr Alex Crowe, Deputy Director Incentive Schemes & Academic Partnerships, NHS Resolution and Consultant Nephrologist and Miss Susie Hewitt MBE, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust.
Browne Jacobson has been ranked as a Top Tier law firm in 25 key practice areas in Legal 500 UK 2023, the independent directory of comparative law firm performance. The firm also continues to underpin its status as one of the leading law firms in the East Midlands region with 16 Tier 1 rankings.
On 7 July this year, NHS England published its statutory guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and with it set out the ICBs’ role and responsibilities and how they should collaborate, interact and carry out their anti-fraud, bribery and corruption functions in concert with NHS England.
The Chancellor’s recent mini-budget provided a significant announcement for business as it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 will be scrapped from April 2023.
This case provides a reminder to contracting authorities that whilst the bar for an award of damages in procurement cases is high, following the Supreme Court ruling in Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] 1 WLR 1373, it is not insurmountable when a contracting authority has acted with disregard to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs). There is also further guidance as to the use of frameworks
Welcome to our August edition of Public Matters, our monthly round-up of legal updates, news and insights for the public sector.
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards was due to transition to Liberty Protection Safeguards in October 2020 but delayed due to the pandemic. While the public consultation has now closed and we’re still unclear of what the final legislation and code will look like, it’s worth noting and keeping a watching brief.
