Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Workers are entitled to receive a minimum hourly rate of pay, the national minimum wage (NMW).
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided in the case of Lloyd v Elmhurst School Limited [2022] that the Employment Tribunal (ET) had erred by finding that a term-time salaried hours worker was not entitled to the NMW for hours worked outside school term-time.
Ms Lloyd, a learning support assistant, worked three days a week during school terms and was paid her salary in monthly instalments. Ms Lloyd’s employment contract stated that she was entitled to “usual school holidays” as “holiday with pay”. Her contract did not include any provisions in respect of hours of work, her rate of pay for school holidays or her annual salary. She brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996, contending that she had not been paid the NMW. The question for the ET was whether Ms Lloyd’s basic hours should be calculated over 52 weeks or the 36 weeks she actually worked (plus four weeks of leave entitlement). The ET dismissed her claim on the basis that her basic hours for the purpose of regulation 21(3) of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015 (NMW Regulations) were based on 21 hours over 40 weeks, which were the 36 weeks she worked during school terms and her leave entitlement of four weeks under the Working Time Directive. The ET considered that the additional 12 weeks’ contractual holiday did not form part of her basic hours. Ms Lloyd appealed the ET’s decision.
The EAT held that the ET should have focussed on Ms Lloyd’s employment contract rather than the hours she had in fact worked. The EAT found that a worker’s basic hours do not depend on the hours actually worked, and basic hours can include periods of absence where contractual salary is due to be paid. It was wrong of the ET to focus on whether the Claimant was working outside school terms or not.
The EAT’s decision provides clarification on what is meant by “basic hours” within the meaning of regulation 21(3) of the NMW Regulations. Employers should identify a worker’s basic hours by using their employment contract, not the actual hours that they work. Employers should also take care to ensure the drafting of worker’s contracts are detailed and precise. In Ms Lloyd’s case, the wording of the clause in her contract was a key component of the EAT’s analysis of how her basic hours should be calculated.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] this decision again places emphasis on the complexities relating to part-year workers.
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Are teacher strikes coming to an end?
Legal Update
Parental leave and pay - gender equality?
On-Demand
'School staffing restructures: practical guidance for implementing organisational change' webinar
Legal Update
Updates to the Burgundy Book
Published Article
Third Party Harassment – haven’t we been here before?
On-Demand
Flexible working in schools webinar
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
On-Demand
Industrial action essentials: what you need to know
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Legal Update
Trade unions announce plans to re-ballot members
Legal Update
Widespread industrial action now confirmed for schools
Legal Update
Industrial action and minimum service levels within education
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Guide
Recruiting school staff on a budget – top tips
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Press Release
Law firm picks up record breaking sixth Education Investor Award
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Press Release
Thousands take part in virtual careers event to help increase diversity in the legal profession
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Published Article
Assaults on staff - how can schools reduce the risk?
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Legal Update
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Legal Update
Changes to holiday pay for part-year workers
In July 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited Judgement in the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel relating to the correct calculation of statutory holiday pay for part year workers. This decision has implications for all part year workers on contracts which subsist all year round, whether their hours are normal or irregular.
Legal Update
Browne Jacobson’s market leading Education expertise recognised again in latest Legal 500 rankings
The new set of Legal 500 directory rankings have been published and we are proud to once again be recognised as one of the country’s leading firms advising the Education sector.
Opinion
Internal reports and privilege
In University of Dundee v Chakraborty, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether a first draft of a grievance report could retrospectively be deemed to be privileged.
Opinion
IR35 rules to be scrapped from April 2023
Opinion
Revoking and reforming EU law
The Government has published the Retained EU Revocation and Reform Bill which, if passed, provides for the revocation of all “EU-derived subordinate legislation” (i.e. UK statutory instruments which were introduced to implement EU law) and retained direct EU legislation on 31 December 2023, unless legislation is specifically introduced to save them.
Opinion
Gender equality
On-Demand
Employment Law – Harpur Trust v Brazel – Implications for schools webinar
On 20 July 2022, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited judgment in the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel, upholding the decision of the Court of Appeal. For those of you familiar with this case, you will know that it concerns the statutory leave requirements for part-time and part-year workers. For schools and academies whose workforce consists of a variety of types of part-time and part-year workers, this case is one that must be understood before any changes are applied. Come and join Emma Hughes, Head of HR Services as she puts questions to Ian Deakin, Employment Partner, and Sarah Linden, Senior Associate.
Opinion
Covid-19 vaccine beliefs held to be religious in nature
In Wierowska v HC-One Oval Limited, the Employment Tribunal had to determine whether the Claimant’s beliefs in relation to Covid-19 vaccines amounted to religious beliefs for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.
Opinion
Unions bowled over by strike legislation
As of 21 July, two separate pieces of legislation came into force which seeks to mitigate against strike action. It should come as no surprise that this is a direct response to the rail strikes, which have dominated the news in the last couple of months.
Legal Update
Harpur Trust v Brazel: Supreme Court upholds holiday pay decision for part-year workers
Legal Update
Gender Identity v Gender Beliefs
We have seen a flurry of recent EAT and ET decisions demonstrating the difficulty that employers face in trying to balance different protected characteristics in the workplace. In this article, Lucinda Chaplin and Will Carter, associates in our employment team, explore the principles from these recent cases, and the workplace implications of them.
Published Article
It's time for education to embrace flexible working
If NHS staff can request a flexible approach to working patterns then the sector needs to get serious about what it can offer staff, too, if it is to avoid further strain on recruitment and retention.
Opinion
The Government confirms it has no plans to make menopause a protected characteristic
With menopause cases reaching Employment Tribunals at a record rate, there had been speculation about whether the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) could be amended to include specific protection for menopause.
Legal Update
Can long Covid amount to a disability?
On 7 May 2022, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) tweeted “Discussions continue on whether ‘long Covid’ symptoms constitute a disability. Without case law or scientific consensus, EHRC does not recommend that ‘long’ be treated as a disability.”
Opinion
Long Covid and whether this amounts to a disability
The recent Employment Tribunal decision in Mr T Burke v Turning Point Scotland, Case no.4112457/2021 found that long-Covid amounts to a disability.